09.06.2015 Views

1873 - Old Forge Coal Mines

1873 - Old Forge Coal Mines

1873 - Old Forge Coal Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE<br />

employed in coal mines should understand it. There is quite an improvement<br />

in the qualifications of the mining bosses in the last few<br />

}T<br />

ears, which<br />

shows that we will have in a few years more an educated class of persons<br />

who will be competent to superintend the ventilation and management<br />

of mines.<br />

There have not been as many persons seriously burned by carelessly<br />

handling powder, or Ijv premature blasts, in <strong>1873</strong> as there were in the year<br />

previous. I am of the opinion that a more general use of Mr. H. M. Boies'<br />

safety powder cartridge and Messrs. Daddow and Beadle's safety squib<br />

would reduce the number of this class of accidents.<br />

Respectfully submitted,<br />

PATRICK BLEWITT,<br />

Inspector of <strong>Coal</strong> <strong>Mines</strong>, &c.<br />

Scranton, February 7, 1874.<br />

COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE<br />

CIAL DISTRICT.<br />

COUNTY, ELEVENTH JUDI-<br />

Commonwealth, ex relatione vs. Connell & Co.<br />

1st. Acts of Assembly are to be construed according to their terms, not<br />

according to their titles ; particularly where the former point out the extent<br />

of their application on the one hand, and their limit on the other.<br />

2d. A coal mine operated through a tunnel and having no second outlet<br />

connected with it, is not within the prohibition of the ''Mine Ventilation<br />

Law."<br />

3d. Casus, omissus in a statute, can never be supplied by the court.<br />

Opinion by Harding, P. J.<br />

Bill for an injunction, &c.<br />

The parties to this bill have agreed to the following statement of facts<br />

for the opinion of the court, namely : The defendants are working the<br />

mine by a tunnel or drift, which runs from an opening in the side of a hill,<br />

at a giade to the mine so as to discharge the water by gravity. There is<br />

no second opening other than said tunnel, either by shaft, or slope or outlet,<br />

by which persons engaged in the mine have ingress or egress. If the<br />

court are of the opinion that a decree should be made in favor of the<br />

plaintiff an injunction to be granted ;<br />

if the court, however, shall be of<br />

opinion that the defendants are not violating the law, then bill to be dismissed.<br />

We have already passed upon several features of the act, known as the<br />

•'Mine Ventilation Law." My brother Dana has also decided an important<br />

question arising under it ; but the present bill raises a new phase altogether.<br />

It levels a blow at mining operations, which are carried on through a tunnel<br />

where no second outlet exists, affording a safe and convenient means of<br />

ingress and egress to the persons employed in the mine.<br />

We can very readily conceive as great and appalling disasters might<br />

occur in operating a mine through a tunnel with which no second outlet<br />

was connected as have occurred already, where a mine has been worked<br />

through a shaft without a second outlet, or as might occur in working a<br />

slope without a second outlet.<br />

If the mouth of a tunnel should become sudden^* closed up by a fell of<br />

over-hanging slate, rock and earth, or still worse, if the mine itself should<br />

be, as it were hermetically sealed up by a fall extending from the mouth<br />

of the tunnel to the inner workings, resulting either from insufficient prop-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!