11.06.2015 Views

ODROID-Magazine-201506

ODROID-Magazine-201506

ODROID-Magazine-201506

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SINGLE BOARD COMPUTER COMPARISON<br />

Comparison<br />

of THE Top 4 SBCs<br />

ONE BOARD TO RULE THEM ALL<br />

by Gary Sims @ www.androidauthority.com<br />

The 2012 release of the original Raspberry Pi created a whole movement<br />

of hobbyists, developers, and educationalists, who used the ARM based<br />

platform to create, hack, and teach. Although the Raspberry Pi wasn’t the<br />

first Single Board Computer (SBC) on the market, it succeeded for three important<br />

reasons. First, it was a full computer on a little board, it had a desktop and<br />

you could write computer programs on it; second, it had a set of user programmable<br />

GPIO pins, similar to those found on microcontroller platforms like the<br />

Arduino; third, and probably most importantly, it only cost $35.<br />

Since then, the SBC market has grown significantly and the Raspberry Pi is no<br />

longer the only choice. Among the popular devices available are the <strong>ODROID</strong>-<br />

C1, the HummingBoard, the MIP Creator CI20, and the Raspberry Pi 2. Of<br />

course, the list of available boards is much longer, but these are the ones that I<br />

have personally tested.<br />

Comparison in size of all of the single board computers tested<br />

The SBC market is heavily dominated by ARM and three of the four boards<br />

that we will be looking at use ARM based processors. The exception is the Creator<br />

CI20 which uses a MIPS processor. So before we compare the boards, let<br />

me formally introduce you to each one.<br />

Raspberry Pi 2<br />

Although the Raspberry Pi 1 was enormously successful, there was one complaint:<br />

the overall performance of the board was lacking, especially when running<br />

desktop applications. The performance was less than desirable because it<br />

used a single core CPU clock at just 900 MHz. Considering the cost, the innovative<br />

nature of the board, and its versatility, then the performance is perfectly understandable,<br />

but there was room for improvement. That improvement came in<br />

<strong>ODROID</strong> MAGAZINE 30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!