14.06.2015 Views

Transport Connections Evaluation Report - TDSA

Transport Connections Evaluation Report - TDSA

Transport Connections Evaluation Report - TDSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABCD<br />

Department of Human Services<br />

<strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Connections</strong> Program<br />

Government<br />

July 2006<br />

• After undertaking these steps, the lead agencies can award the project the funding applied<br />

for, ask for further information or ask for refinements to be made to the application itself.<br />

Throughout the application process, appropriate levels of support should be provided by the lead<br />

agencies, particularly in relation to:<br />

• advice regarding what is required in the application<br />

• examples of successful applications<br />

• guidance on structures, partnerships, and activities that could be undertaken in a local<br />

project catchment.<br />

This assistance should be provided evenly across all areas to ensure those communities, or<br />

catchments, which are without appropriate resource levels, are not disadvantaged further.<br />

Recommendation 6: That DVC, and the other lead agencies undertake a two-stage<br />

application process to better understand the communities in which assistance is being sought.<br />

The lead agencies should also offer and provide support throughout the application process<br />

to ensure local communities, or catchments, are not further disadvantaged.<br />

5.6 Project catchment size<br />

The catchment area of the local projects varies across the program, from pilot projects focussing<br />

on single communities to pilot projects spanning multiple Local Government Areas (LGAs).<br />

Observations from the evaluation process include:<br />

• The success of the projects is not wholly dependant on the catchment size – projects can be<br />

successful where they are located in a single community, for example, Valley to City<br />

Efficiently, in a single LGA such as Bass Coast TCP, or multiple LGAs such as Let’s GET<br />

Connected.<br />

• Where projects span multiple shires, the focus of a coordinator can be diluted by the<br />

number of communities, or distance required to travel in that catchment.<br />

• Where a coordinator is auspiced by more than one agency across multiple shires, the<br />

duplication of work can decrease the effectiveness of that project. Examples include<br />

different reporting formats and timelines or different strategies and vision of each shire.<br />

If projects are to operate across multiple LGAs, some thought needs to be given to the<br />

following:<br />

• Two coordinators in one project can enhance the effectiveness if the project spans multiple<br />

areas. For instance, each coordinator can focus on a certain community/s, or cohort in a<br />

community, the coordinators can ensure alignment across multiple areas (such as planning<br />

and strategy documents undertaken in a coordinated manner), and both coordinators can<br />

bring expertise from a range of areas (for example, communication, planning and<br />

facilitation).<br />

• Should a project wish to span multiple areas with one coordinator, greater support may be<br />

required from the regional and statewide representatives to assist the coordinator in<br />

meeting their objectives, and planning their work program.<br />

Final <strong>Evaluation</strong> - <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>Connections</strong> Program 2006<br />

43<br />

© 2006 KPMG, an Australian partnership, is part of the KPMG International network. KPMG International<br />

is a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!