19.06.2015 Views

egypt-final-presidential-elections-2012

egypt-final-presidential-elections-2012

egypt-final-presidential-elections-2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Carter Center<br />

Presidential Election in Egypt<br />

12. Put in place clear provisions that allow for the<br />

impartial observation of all electoral processes<br />

and that facilitates the work of witnessing entities<br />

such as domestic and international civil<br />

society organizations.<br />

The electoral framework governing the Egyptian<br />

<strong>presidential</strong> election does not currently include<br />

any provision authorizing or guaranteeing electoral<br />

witnessing by civil society organizations or<br />

other entities, such as multilateral organizations.<br />

Impartial election witnessing by domestic and<br />

international CSOs can enhance the integrity<br />

of the election process by enabling independent<br />

analysis of the quality of the process and appropriate<br />

recommendations for improvement. It<br />

promotes public confidence, electoral participation,<br />

and can mitigate the potential for electionrelated<br />

conflict. The Carter Center strongly urges<br />

Egypt’s lawmakers to consider including provisions<br />

that provide for impartial scrutiny of the process<br />

for all future <strong>elections</strong>.<br />

In addition, in order to facilitate effective and<br />

meaningful assessments by CSOs, Egypt’s electoral<br />

authorities should (a) Establish a clear framework<br />

for witnessing organizations to follow in applying<br />

for accreditation and in operating once they have<br />

been accredited; (b) Ensure that accreditation is<br />

available prior to the start of the electoral process,<br />

which starts as early as amendments to the legal<br />

framework are discussed, and include the voter<br />

registration process and candidate nomination;<br />

(c) Provide clear channels of communication with<br />

the witnessing organizations; and most importantly,<br />

(d) Provide access to all aspects of the<br />

process for domestic and international witnesses.<br />

13. Ensure that the law safeguards the<br />

independence of civil society organizations<br />

and their work from state interference while<br />

ensuring their transparency and accountability.<br />

CSOs are important stakeholders in the election<br />

process. If allowed to operate freely, they<br />

can perform key functions that contribute to the<br />

integrity and credibility of the electoral process,<br />

such as providing voter education and acting as<br />

watchdogs of the <strong>elections</strong>. The current Egyptian<br />

legal framework governing CSOs allows for<br />

unwarranted state interference of their activities<br />

and impedes the realization of CSOs’ role as valuable<br />

independent stakeholders in the election<br />

process. To better meet its international obligations,<br />

The Carter Center urges Egypt’s future<br />

legislators to adopt new laws that guarantee the<br />

autonomy of CSOs with only minimal regulation.<br />

This will help to ensure that Egypt lives up to its<br />

obligations to ensure the right to participate in<br />

public affairs and to promote transparency.<br />

14. Ensure effective and collaborative voter education<br />

efforts by the election management body.<br />

The <strong>presidential</strong> election law gives the election<br />

management body discretionary authority to<br />

inform and educate voters about how to exercise<br />

their political rights. The EMB took some steps<br />

to educate the public, through public service<br />

announcements, instructional videos posted to<br />

official websites, and written educational material.<br />

Without the express requirement to do so,<br />

however, future EMBs might choose not to play<br />

this important role of chief educator on the<br />

electoral process. The Carter Center recommends<br />

that future EMBs should be fully obligated by the<br />

law as a nonpartisan source to inform and educate<br />

voters in line with Egypt’s commitment to take<br />

all necessary steps to ensure the realization of<br />

fundamental rights, such as the right to vote in<br />

genuine periodic <strong>elections</strong> by secret ballot and<br />

with universal suffrage.<br />

As is the case in most countries, there is<br />

more that can be done to enhance voter education<br />

further. Above all, The Carter Center<br />

urges Egypt’s future electoral authorities to take<br />

concrete steps to coordinate more closely with<br />

political parties and CSOs to maximize their voter<br />

education and information efforts.<br />

EMBs should also endeavor to expand its voter<br />

information and education campaigns to include<br />

as many forms of media as possible to provide<br />

as much coverage as possible to Egypt’s voting<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!