Vendetta Final Proposal Part 2 - Cal Poly
Vendetta Final Proposal Part 2 - Cal Poly
Vendetta Final Proposal Part 2 - Cal Poly
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9 Weight & Balance<br />
Weight and balance has proven to be a challenge in designing the <strong>Vendetta</strong> for both subsonic and supersonic<br />
flight conditions. After having sized the aircraft using a weight fraction method, and after having developed an initial<br />
configuration, the next step was to develop a more accurate, class II weight buildup of the aircraft. The class II method<br />
used in the design of the <strong>Vendetta</strong> was developed from those methods found in the Nicolai, Raymer, and Roskam texts in<br />
order to obtain a collaborative and unbiased perspective. These methods involved defining several physical and<br />
geometric parameters of the aircraft. These parameters were inputs into a series of equations developed from historical<br />
weight trends. The weight estimations for various components as well as the level of agreement between authors are<br />
shown below in Table 9.I.<br />
Table 9.I - Initial Component Weight Buildup<br />
Weight (lb)<br />
Accuracy<br />
Component Roskam Nicolai Raymer Average Roskam Nicolai Raymer<br />
Structures<br />
Wing Group 9,687 11,466 7,870 9,674 0% -31% 26%<br />
Horizontal Tail 1,135 1,694 958 1,262 14% -62% 32%<br />
Vertical Tail 801 1,538 1,497 1,279 47% -34% -28%<br />
Fuselage 10,681 16,031 10,398 12,370 19% -52% 22%<br />
Main Landing Gear 2,742 2,969 1,156 2,289 -33% -52% 60%<br />
Nose Landing Gear 387 405 408 400 5% -2% -3%<br />
Propulsions 10,636 10,878 11,199 11,209 4% 0% -4%<br />
Systems 18,649 14,506 14,350 20,574 -29% 12% 13%<br />
Payload 9,280 9,280 9,280 9,280 0% 0% 0%<br />
Fuel 58,974 58,974 58,974 58,974 0% 0% 0%<br />
TOGW 123,433 128,215 128,215 127,778 4% -2% -2%<br />
The detailed weight buildup of the structures, control surfaces, systems, payload, and fuel groups has been<br />
compacted in order to save space and can be viewed in its entirety in Foldout 1. The table indicates that all three authors<br />
tend to disagree to some extent in their weight estimates of certain components, and for other components, one author<br />
may have no way of estimating that components weight at all. A more accurate and detailed component weight buildup<br />
was developed by considering all three methods and taking the average shared between them. One author’s estimation<br />
was discarded if it did not agree to within ±30% of the average of the other authors’ estimations. The remaining weights<br />
were averaged in order to develop a weight buildup for the entire aircraft. The class II weight buildup for the <strong>Vendetta</strong><br />
after the elimination process is shown in Table 9.II<br />
42