Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B. Introduction<br />
B.1 Objectives<br />
The objective of this work assignment is to determine incremental direct manufacturing<br />
costs for a set of advance light-duty vehicle technologies. The technologies selected are<br />
on the leading edge for reducing future greenhouse gas emissions, primarily in the form<br />
of tailpipe carbon dioxide (CO2). Such reductions generally correspond to fuel economy<br />
improvements. Each technology selected is evaluated against a baseline vehicle<br />
technology configuration representative of the current state of vehicle design and similar<br />
overall driving performance. To obtain cost results across the diverse light-duty vehicle<br />
fleet, application of the new technologies in six (6) vehicle size classes is considered,<br />
though no costing was performed for cases in which a technology is not generally<br />
considered applicable to a vehicle class. The vehicle size classes are:<br />
� Sub-Compact car: a subcompact car typically powered by a small in-line 4 cylinder<br />
engine.<br />
� Small car: a small car typically powered by an in-line 4 cylinder engine<br />
� Large car: a midsize or large passenger car typically powered by a V6 engine<br />
� Minivan: a minivan or large cross-over vehicle with a large frontal area, typically<br />
powered by a V6 engine, capable of carrying ~ 6 or more passengers<br />
� Small truck: a small or mid-sized sports-utility or cross-over vehicle, or a small<br />
pick-up truck, powered by a large V6 or small V8 engine<br />
� Large truck: large sports-utility vehicles and large pickup trucks, typically powered<br />
by a large V8 engine<br />
This report focuses on the incremental costs for two (2) types of advance light-duty<br />
vehicle technologies: power-split and P2 hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) technology.<br />
Because the basis of the costing methodology is founded on having physical hardware to<br />
evaluate, and there were no P2 HEVs available in North America during the time of the<br />
analysis, a large size power-split HEV vehicle was chosen for the lead cost analysis.<br />
From the lead cost analysis, incremental direct manufacturing costs were developed for<br />
other power-split vehicle segments as well as P2 HEV vehicle segments.<br />
For the large size power-split cost analysis (Case Study 0502), a 2010 Ford Fusion HEV<br />
was evaluated for content difference relative to a 2010 Ford Fusion vehicle having a<br />
conventional powertrain. The Fusion HEV powertrain consisted of a 2.5L Atkinson<br />
Cycle I4 engine (156 hp), with two (2) AC synchronous permanent magnet motors (106<br />
11