Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D.2 Engine System and <strong>Cost</strong> Summary Overview<br />
D.2.1 Engine Hardware Overview<br />
The Fusion SE is fitted with a conventional 3.0 liter V-6 (Figure D-3) while the Fusion Hybrid<br />
contains an Atkinson 2.5 liter I-4 cylinder engine (Figure D-4). Both Ford Fusion engine<br />
designs featured aluminum blocks and cylinder heads. The induction systems for both engines<br />
have Dual Overhead Cams (DOHC), Variable Valve Timing (VVT), Electronic Throttle Control<br />
(ETC), and Mass Air Flow (MAF) sensors with Intake Air Temperature (IAT) and Manifold<br />
Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensors. Another similarity was the use of single-stage composite<br />
intake manifolds and intake routing paths originating behind the drivers headlamp bucket. Both<br />
engines have Port Fuel Injection (PFI) and Coil on Plug (COP) ignition (I4 has a single knock<br />
sensor, V6 has dual knock sensors).<br />
Figure D-3: 3.0L-V6 installation (Fusion SE)<br />
Aside from displacement and cylinder configurations, differences between the two (2)<br />
engines were found in the valve train: the 3.0L-V6 used direct-acting mechanical buckets<br />
and the 2.5L-I4 utilized roller-finger follower type lifters. Compression ratios also<br />
differed: the 3.0L-V6 was 10.3:1 while the 2.5L-V6 was 12.3:1. Also, as is common in<br />
most hybrid vehicles, the 2.5L-I4 was an Atkinson-Cycle engine for increased efficiency.<br />
59