18.11.2012 Views

Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...

Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...

Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

D.2 Engine System and <strong>Cost</strong> Summary Overview<br />

D.2.1 Engine Hardware Overview<br />

The Fusion SE is fitted with a conventional 3.0 liter V-6 (Figure D-3) while the Fusion Hybrid<br />

contains an Atkinson 2.5 liter I-4 cylinder engine (Figure D-4). Both Ford Fusion engine<br />

designs featured aluminum blocks and cylinder heads. The induction systems for both engines<br />

have Dual Overhead Cams (DOHC), Variable Valve Timing (VVT), Electronic Throttle Control<br />

(ETC), and Mass Air Flow (MAF) sensors with Intake Air Temperature (IAT) and Manifold<br />

Absolute Pressure (MAP) sensors. Another similarity was the use of single-stage composite<br />

intake manifolds and intake routing paths originating behind the drivers headlamp bucket. Both<br />

engines have Port Fuel Injection (PFI) and Coil on Plug (COP) ignition (I4 has a single knock<br />

sensor, V6 has dual knock sensors).<br />

Figure D-3: 3.0L-V6 installation (Fusion SE)<br />

Aside from displacement and cylinder configurations, differences between the two (2)<br />

engines were found in the valve train: the 3.0L-V6 used direct-acting mechanical buckets<br />

and the 2.5L-I4 utilized roller-finger follower type lifters. Compression ratios also<br />

differed: the 3.0L-V6 was 10.3:1 while the 2.5L-V6 was 12.3:1. Also, as is common in<br />

most hybrid vehicles, the 2.5L-I4 was an Atkinson-Cycle engine for increased efficiency.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!