Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A. Executive Summary<br />
<strong>Light</strong>-<strong>Duty</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Cost</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong><br />
<strong>Power</strong>-split and P2 HEV Case Studies<br />
The United States <strong>Environmental</strong> Protection Agency (EPA) contracted with FEV, Inc. to<br />
determine incremental direct manufacturing costs for a set of advanced light-duty vehicle<br />
technologies. The technologies selected are on the leading edge for reducing emissions<br />
of greenhouse gases in the future, primarily in the form of tailpipe carbon dioxide (CO2).<br />
In contrast to comparable cost analyses done in the past, which relied heavily on supplier<br />
price quotes for key components, this study is based to a large degree on teardowns of<br />
vehicles or vehicle systems that employ the new technologies and of similar vehicles or<br />
systems without the new technologies. Analysts with expertise in automotive design,<br />
materials, and manufacturing then compare the teardown components and evaluate the<br />
differences. Using databases for materials, labor, manufacturing overhead, and mark-up<br />
costs, the overall cost to manufacture individual parts and assemble them into systems are<br />
calculated and summed into final results. A model consisting of an extensive set of<br />
linked spreadsheets and associated macros has been developed to perform the<br />
calculations, to track the input data, identify sources of information, describe assumptions<br />
used in the case study, and provide analysis tools such as forecasting to future years.<br />
To establish a consistent framework for all costing work, several primary technology and<br />
manufacturing assumptions were established that directly impact the cost parameters used<br />
in the analysis. For example, the manufacturing time period and location identifies the<br />
labor rate data uploaded into the analysis. The maturity level of the technology defines<br />
the mark-up rates (end-item scrap, corporate overhead/SG&A, profit, engineering, design<br />
and testing (ED&T)/research and development (R&D)) applied against the total<br />
manufacturing cost.<br />
Examples of universal assumptions used for the cost analyses included in this report are<br />
as follows:<br />
� <strong>Technology</strong> and manufacturing methods are considered mature in the 2009/2010<br />
timeframe, e.g., well developed product designs, high production volumes, high<br />
first time manufacturing yields, significant marketplace competition, low field<br />
warranty.<br />
� Manufacturing rates are considered high volume, i.e., approximately 450,000 units<br />
per year, and maintained throughout the product life.<br />
� All OEM and supplier manufacturing locations are in North America (i.e., <strong>US</strong>A<br />
and Canada), unless otherwise stated.