18.11.2012 Views

Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...

Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...

Light Duty Technology Cost Analysis, Power - US Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

footage utilization of the primary, process support, and general plant and office<br />

equipment, an annual salary contribution cost is calculated ($6,625).<br />

The final section, Calculated Hourly Burden Rate, takes the calculated values from the<br />

previous sections and calculates the hourly burden rate in three (3) steps: (1) 100%<br />

efficiency and utilization ($30.54/hour); (2) user-defined efficiency with 100% utilization<br />

($35.12/hour); and (3) both user-defined efficiency and utilization ( $38.79/hour).<br />

The majority of primary process equipment groups (e.g., injection molding, aluminum die<br />

casting, forging, stamping and forming) in the manufacturing overhead database are<br />

broken into five (5) to ten (10) burden rate subcategories based on processing complexity<br />

and/or size, as discussed in the manufacturing overhead review. For any given category,<br />

there will often be a range of equipment sizes and associated burden rates which are<br />

averaged into a final burden rate. The goal of this averaging method is to keep the<br />

database compact while maintaining high costing resolution.<br />

In the example of the 500T injection molding press burden rate, the calculated rate<br />

($38.79) was averaged with three (3) other calculated rates (for 390T, 610T and 720T<br />

injection mold presses) into a final burden rate called “Injection Molding, Medium Size<br />

and/or Moderate Complexity.” The final calculated burden rate of $50.58/hour is used in<br />

applications requiring injection molding presses in the range of 400-800 tons.<br />

The sample calculation of the manufacturing overhead rate for an injection molding<br />

machine above is a simple example highlighting the steps and parameters involved in<br />

calculating overhead rates. Regardless of the complexity of the operation or process, the<br />

same methodology is employed when developing overhead rates.<br />

As discussed, multiple methods of arriving at burden rates are used within the cost<br />

analysis. Every attempt is made to acquire multiple data points for a given burden rate as<br />

a means of validating the rate. In some cases, the validation is accomplished at the final<br />

rate level and in other cases multiple pieces of input data, used in the calculation of a rate,<br />

are acquired as a means of validation.<br />

C.4.5 Mark-up (Scrap, SG&A, Profit, ED&T)<br />

C.4.5.1 Overview<br />

All mark-up rates for Tier 1 and Tier 2/3 automotive suppliers referenced throughout the<br />

cost analysis can be found in the Mark-up Database, except in those cases where unique<br />

component tolerances, performance requirements, or some other unique feature dictates a<br />

special rate. In cases where a mark-up rate is “flagged” within the costing worksheet, a<br />

note is included which describes the assumption differences justifying the modified rate.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!