10.07.2015 Views

220-Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2nd Edition-Gerhard Nahler Annette Mollet-3211898352-S

220-Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2nd Edition-Gerhard Nahler Annette Mollet-3211898352-S

220-Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2nd Edition-Gerhard Nahler Annette Mollet-3211898352-S

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

127more categories, e.g. mild, moderate, severe; suitable statisticaltests are e.g. for two groups, unpaired samples the Mann–WhitneyU or median test, for two groups, paired samples Wilcoxon signedrankstest, for multiple groups, unpaired samples Kruskal–Wallisone way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance and for multiple groups, paired samplesFriedman two-way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance; → see data.ordinal scale Scales frequently used in clinical trials to quantifyphenomena or outcomes which are non-dimensional, eitheras a “single state” s. (scale is designed to measure patients at asingle point in time, e.g. patients state at entry and at the trial’sconclusion, such as the who-performance status, the keith–wagener classification for hypertensive retinopathy, the Kurtzkescore in multiple sclerosis or the ritchie index in rheumatology,or as “transition” s. (measuring magnitude and direction <strong>of</strong>changes directly and symmetrically, without baseline – time 1 assessment– e.g. –2 much worse, –1 worse, 0 the same, +1 better, +2much better); when using o.s. a few rules should be followed: (1)individual elements <strong>of</strong> the s. should be clearly defined, and mustassess the same phenomena; (2) ranks should be discrete, nonoverlapping(mutually exclusive) and in a reasonable, hierarchicalorder; (3) scale scores should be placed in a clinical contextand should detect both improvement and deterioration withoutclustering subjects at one extreme on the s.; (4) correct analysesshould be concentrated on within-patient changes, concordance(similar, correlating trends) with other outcome measures shouldbe shown; finally, increments from one rank to the next are usuallyfar from linear and (++) does not mean twice as good or worsethan (+); although scales can be made more sensitive by increasingthe number <strong>of</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> severity this is usually accompanied byreduced reliability; → see also quality <strong>of</strong> life scale, scale,score, validity, visual analog scale.original medical record → see source data.orphan diseases WHO: pathological conditions affecting 65 to100/100,000 <strong>of</strong> the general population; FDA: incidence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!