10.07.2015 Views

220-Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2nd Edition-Gerhard Nahler Annette Mollet-3211898352-S

220-Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2nd Edition-Gerhard Nahler Annette Mollet-3211898352-S

220-Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 2nd Edition-Gerhard Nahler Annette Mollet-3211898352-S

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66enzinformation about the physical/chemical, pharmacological and/or toxicological properties are obtained and assessed in relationto the extent <strong>of</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> the environment. Phase II is divided intwo parts: Tier A begins with an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the possible fate andeffects <strong>of</strong> the active substance and/or its metabolites. If within TierA, no risk is detected, there is no need to proceed to Tier B. If a riskis detected, then the fate and effects <strong>of</strong> the active substance and/orits metabolites in the relevant compartment should be adequatelyinvestigated in Tier B. (EMEA 2005, CPMP/SWP/4447/00); → seealso predicted environmental concentration.enzyme A protein catalyst that facilitates specific chemical or metabolicreactions necessary for cell growth and reproduction.epidemic Occurrence <strong>of</strong> a disease on a higher rate than expected,based on past experience; → see also epidemiology.epidemiology def.: study <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> diseases or adverseevents in human populations, and <strong>of</strong> the factors which influencethis distribution; → see also evaluation technique, extra incidencerate <strong>of</strong> non-vaccinated groups, matched pair, neighborhoodcontrol subjects, yellow card scheme.equipoise Situation where a trialist is uncertain about which treatmentin a parallel design would be therapeutically superior; → seeblinding.error Most frequent origin <strong>of</strong> unreliable data; if e.g. errors occur witha frequency <strong>of</strong> 2% at each <strong>of</strong> the following levels: misinterpretation,entry on case record form, data entry in computers, processing,and presentation in reports, only 88.56% <strong>of</strong> them would be reliable;other types <strong>of</strong> e.: sampling e. (improper sample processing, e.g.phlebotomy, non-fasting condition, sample storage/transport);systematic e. (i.e. non-random unidirectional e., e.g. due to sampledeterioration, changes <strong>of</strong> the instrument response or measuringconditions with time); random e. (variations affecting precision<strong>of</strong> methods at random such as errors <strong>of</strong> measurement); clerical e.(key-punch e.) (conc. data entry or transfer) systematic technologist/observere. (different technicians never perform a manualprocedure in exactly the same way); laboratory bias (e. which arisefrom basic differences between laboratories that involve reagents,instrumentation, environment and methods); in clinical trialserroneous data arise most <strong>of</strong>ten from protocol-violations (wronginclusion, unauthorised co-therapy, dosing errors, broken blindness,multiple admission, treatment discontinuation, wrong allocation,poor adherers a.s.o.), rarely also from fraudulent practices;→ see also alpha e., beta e., gamma e., bug, data, ecologicalfallacy, medication e., neyman fallacy, programmatic error,raw-data, sampling error, outliers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!