Compendium of Country Examples and Lessons Learned from ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Country Sampling for CPI Stakeholder involvement/Validation Procurement Capacity Development (CD) Plan based on assessmentresultsGhana 34In 2006, 213 procuremententities were assessed usingthe PPME tool (PublicProcurement Model ofExcellence) and its KeyPerformance Indicators.Development partners, civil society andprivate sector actively participated fromplanning to final review of results.Proposed key recommendations:Kenya No report received. No report received. No report received.MalawiThe procuring entitiesselected to participate in theassessment were chosenbased on the volume of theirprocurements. Besides, asmall sample of district andcity assemblies as well asthe Central GovernmentStore was included in thesample.Development partners, civil society andprivate sector actively participated fromplanning to final review of results. supplementing the legal framework; improving the assessment framework; make operational web-based procurement planning tool; build up sustainable procurement training programs with local traininginstitutions; establish national standard procurement certification system; execute the developed training program; decide on and implement career path for procurement professionals; establish efficient mechanisms to delegate authority for procurementdecisions; strengthen private sector capacity; make operational the Appeals and Complaints Panel; strengthen procurement expertise among audit institutions; publish regularly Procurement Bulletin; supplement the website with information on contract opportunities, contractawards and procurement plans.A Procurement Capacity Assessment and Strategy Formulation was carriedout. The diagnostic approach of the OECD-DAC framework was broadened toinclude an explanatory dimension. In this way, the focus of the data collectionwas not only on “which” systems are in place and “how” these work in practice,but also on “why” this is so, hereby providing an important starting point whendefining actual capacity development strategies later, in the capacitydevelopment process.Procurement Capacity Development and System Strengthening Plan ofNovember 2007 forms the coordinated basis for all capacity developmentinitiatives in the field of procurement until 2012.34Non-pilot country.COMPENDIUM OF COUNTRY EXAMPLES AND LESSONS LEARNED […] - OECD 2008 69
Country Sampling for CPI Stakeholder involvement/Validation Procurement Capacity Development (CD) Plan based on assessmentresultsAs a result of the explanatoryfocus, a qualitative datacollection approach hadbeen selected. In relation tothis, the assessment teamdeveloped a number ofqualitative CPI indicators.Furthermore, to be able toillustrate the gap betweenBLIs and CPIs and allow forfuture benchmarking, ascoring system similar to theBLI scoring system has beenadopted for CPI indicators,based on the scoring systemalready used by the Office ofthe Director of PublicProcurement (ODPP) in theirwork on monitoringcompliance at procuringentity level.In accordance with the UNDP approach, both short-term and medium-term CDstrategies presented in this Plan are divided into the following four categories: institutional reform and incentives; knowledge, training and learning; leadership development; accountability and voice mechanisms.To allow for measuring the progress achieved as a result of the capacitydevelopment initiatives, each CD strategy has attached a set of outputindicators, outcome indicators, baselines and targets.NigerA test analyzing compliancewas conducted. It included15 procurement caseshandled by 9 differentministries with a total valueequivalent of approximatelyUSD 4.7 million. The testcomprised the procurementof goods (8 cases), works (6cases) and consultingservices (1 case).Self-assessment by l’Agence deRégulation des Marchés Publics (ARMP).Validation by international consultant andauditor.Assessment report does not include a procurement capacity development plan.70 COMPENDIUM OF COUNTRY EXAMPLES AND LESSONS LEARNED […] - © OECD 2008
Page 1 and 2:
Compendium of Country Examplesand L
Page 3:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 8 and 9:
ForewordIn 2002, the OECD-DAC and t
Page 10 and 11:
Background and Purpose of this Pape
Page 12 and 13:
The Procurement Assessment Methodol
Page 14 and 15:
The Process of Preparing and Planni
Page 16 and 17:
Box 1. High-level political support
Page 18 and 19:
Table 2. Potential stakeholders in
Page 20 and 21: Based on the assessment reports pro
Page 22 and 23: willing to participate in the asses
Page 24 and 25: Implementing a Procurement Assessme
Page 26 and 27: 1 = areas where substantive work is
Page 28 and 29: Country experiencesMost of the pilo
Page 30 and 31: Indicator 4: Normative and regulato
Page 32 and 33: “Considerations for assessment”
Page 34 and 35: Lao, for example, reports that nati
Page 36 and 37: Figure 4. Possible negative impact
Page 38 and 39: Country experiencesThe usefulness o
Page 40 and 41: They identify and correct mistakes
Page 42 and 43: Box 8. Validation process in Zambia
Page 44 and 45: Making Use of the Assessment Result
Page 46 and 47: Procurement Capacity Development: I
Page 48: StakeholdersThe GPP argues that as
Page 51 and 52: Table 4. Compliance and Performance
Page 53 and 54: Engage banks in a dialogue to secur
Page 56 and 57: Linkages with Public Financial Mana
Page 58 and 59: Elements of transparency (transpare
Page 60 and 61: which serves as the externalinforma
Page 62 and 63: Next StepsThe Joint Venture on Proc
Page 64 and 65: CountryLatestprogressreportAssessme
Page 72 and 73: Country Sampling for CPI Stakeholde
Page 80: Country Sampling for CPI Stakeholde
Page 83 and 84: Procurementprocess (30%)10. Method
Page 85 and 86: 4. Member countries should ensure t
Page 88 and 89: Annex DList of Referenced Resources
show all

Compendium of Country Examples and Lessons Learned from ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?