Thermal applicability of two-phase thermosyphons in ... - LEPTEN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

726 A.K. da Silva, M.B.H. Mantelli / Applied Thermal Engineering 24 (2004) 717–733T avg, e200150T avg, eT avg, i1005000 50 100 150 200Fig. 4. Comparison of experimental internal and external front wall averaged temperature (guard heater efficiency).T avg, i200150P10050Total power appliedLiquid power applied00 18003600 5400 7200tFig. 5. Experimental electric power applied to each evaporator.temperature, which always happens to occur in one of the four evaporators (T max ffi 260 °C). Thecalibration error found was much lower than the error indicated by the manufacturer, ±2.2 °C.Conservatively, ±2.2 °C reading error was adopted to all temperature measurements.5. Results and discussionIn this section, we will discuss the results concerning the thermal behavior of thermosyphonsinside our prototype. Figure 6 shows the variation of the averaged temperature difference between
A.K. da Silva, M.B.H. Mantelli / Applied Thermal Engineering 24 (2004) 717–733 72740200 W/per evap.3050 W/per evap.100 W/per evap.150 W/per evap.T e − T c201000 1800 3600 5400 7200tFig. 6. Averaged temperature difference between the evaporator and condenser.the evaporator and condenser. An oscillatory behavior can be seen when t < 1800 (i.e., 50 W/perevaporator). The explanation for that resides on the so-called Geyser effect [17]: at low heat input,the thermosyphons work under a regime where large random bubbles of size of the same order ofthe tube diameter, grow on the evaporator carrying over them large amount of liquid workingfluid towards the condenser. Those bubbles collapse as soon as they reach the condenser section.At this level of heat input, the thermosyphons do not present a good thermal performance interms of uniform temperature distribution on the condensers. However at higher levels of heatinput, i.e., for 1800 < t < 3600 (P ¼ 100 W), 3600 < t < 5400 (P ¼ 150 W), and finally for5400 < t < 7200 (P ¼ 200 W), the averaged difference of temperatures between the evaporatorand condenser presents a ‘‘smoother’’ shape. For t P 1800, each time period of constant powerinput presents one maximum and two minimums values of the T e T c parameter. The maximumis located at approximately half of each time period. The two minimums occur at the beginningand at the end of each time period. This temperature difference physical behavior shows that thereis a ‘‘time delay’’ required to warm up the evaporator and consequently to transfer the energy tothe cooking chamber while, in this mean time, the evaporatorÕs temperature raises faster. Bydefining the thermosyphon global conductance asQC ¼ð12ÞðT e T c ÞH ewhere H e is the evaporator height, it is easy to see that the larger the difference T e T c , the worsethe thermal performance of the thermosyphon for a fixed heat input. Therefore, observing Fig. 6,we can see that during around half of the heating time, for each power time step, the thermalperformance of the thermosyphon decreases to a minimum value located close to the mean timestep. After that, the performance increases again. As T e T c did not reach a constant value in anyof the power input time steps, we can say that the steady-state regime was not achieved in thepresent experiment. Furthermore, in Fig. 6, we can conclude that the thermosyphonsÕ evaporatorsshould be exposed to a smooth power raising input, until the temperature required inside the
Page 1 and 2: Applied Thermal Engineering 24 (200
Page 3 and 4: A.K. da Silva, M.B.H. Mantelli / Ap
Page 7 and 8: fraction reaches A k and is absorbe
Page 9: A.K. da Silva, M.B.H. Mantelli / Ap
Page 17: A.K. da Silva, M.B.H. Mantelli / Ap

Thermal applicability of two-phase thermosyphons in ... - LEPTEN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?