10.07.2015 Views

Thermal applicability of two-phase thermosyphons in ... - LEPTEN

Thermal applicability of two-phase thermosyphons in ... - LEPTEN

Thermal applicability of two-phase thermosyphons in ... - LEPTEN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

728 A.K. da Silva, M.B.H. Mantelli / Applied <strong>Thermal</strong> Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g 24 (2004) 717–733cook<strong>in</strong>g chamber is reached. This k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> heat<strong>in</strong>g process will avoid the temperature peaks shown<strong>in</strong> Fig. 6, and consequently maximize the <strong>thermosyphons</strong>Õ global conductance. It should be notedthat the experimental run stopped at t ffi 6300 s, because as mentioned earlier <strong>in</strong> Section 3, themaximum allowed temperature <strong>in</strong> any po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> the four evaporators is 260 °C. At thispo<strong>in</strong>t the electrical <strong>in</strong>sulation <strong>of</strong> the sk<strong>in</strong> heaters starts to degrade.Figure 7 shows the experimental isothermal l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>side the prototype at the end <strong>of</strong> the test (i.e.,t ffi 6300 s). It can be observed that <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> the temperature gradient <strong>in</strong> x-direction between the<strong>two</strong> vertical walls (i.e., x ¼ 0 and x ¼ 0:7) and the center is around 50 °C, no overheated spot isfound, and the temperature distribution on the vertical wall is practically uniform. The samehappens <strong>in</strong> the vertical plane <strong>of</strong> symmetry (x ¼ 0:35), where the air temperature is about 160 °C allover the prototype, show<strong>in</strong>g just a little <strong>of</strong> stratification <strong>in</strong> the upper side, which reaches less than190 °C.Figure 8 shows a comparison between the mean temperature <strong>of</strong> the air <strong>in</strong>side the prototype anda theoretical curve based on the characteristic velocity v ¼ 0:5 ms 1 . This comparison shows thatthe theoretical model over estimate the mean temperature obta<strong>in</strong>ed from theoretical curve <strong>in</strong>about 15 °C for t ffi 5400 s. This difference can be attributed to the convection heat transfercoefficients associated with each <strong>in</strong>ternal surface. The values used <strong>in</strong> the model for these coefficientswere obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the literature [19] for mixed turbulent convection over flat plates <strong>in</strong>open environments. Furthermore, the data was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from a rectangular cavity where thenatural air circulation is enhanced by four small fans, which were not able to create the same flowconditions assumed <strong>in</strong> the model. Besides the simplicity <strong>of</strong> the theoretical model, its robustness1210 210190H0.519016017017000 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7LFig. 7. Experimental temperature distribution <strong>in</strong>side the prototype––isothermal l<strong>in</strong>es.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!