Office of Naval Research - National Transportation Library

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ReferencesBureau of Transportation Statistics, “Shipment Characteristics by Mode of Transport for the UnitedStates,” US Department of Transportation.http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/2002/united_states/html/table_01_b.html.Corbett, James J., James Winebrake, and Alex E. Farrell, “Emissions Analysis of Freight TransportComparing Land-Side and Water-Side Short Sea Routes: Development and Demonstration of aDecision Modeling Tool,” Not dated.Government Accountability Office (GAO), “Freight Transportation: Short Sea Shipping OptionShows Importance of Systematic Approach to Public Investment Decisions,” July 2005, GAO-05-768.Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute, “Tax Systems and Barriers to Great Lakes MaritimeCommerce,” Final Report, Randall Skalberg and James Skurla, A University of Wisconsin-Superiorand University of Minnesota Duluth Consortium, October 2006.GLSLS Study: Final Report, Prepared for Transport Canada, USACE, USDOT, St. Lawrence SeawayManagement Corporation, St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, Environment Canada,U.S. Fish & Wildlife, Fall 2007.Hill, Robert P. “The Articulated Tug/Barge – AT/B: The History and State of the Art,” President,Ocean Tug & Barge Engineering Corp. Undated DocumentI-95 Corridor Coalition, “Short-Sea and Coastal Shipping Options Study,” Final Report, November2005.IHS Global Insight, Inc., An Evaluation of Maritime Policy in Meeting the Commercial and SecurityNeeds of the United States, Prepared for the USDOT, MARAD, January 7, 2009.Institute of Global Maritime Studies (IGMS), America’s Deep Blue Highway: How Coastal ShippingCould Reduce Traffic Congestion, Lower Pollution, and Bolster National Security, study conductedin cooperation with the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, September 2008.Marc Levinson, “The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the WorldEconomy Bigger,” Princeton University Press, 2006.Lombardo, Gary A., “Short Sea Shipping: Practices, Opportunities and Challenges,” May 2004.Lombardo, Gary A., Robert F. Mulligan, and Change Q. Guan, U.S. Short Sea Shipping: Prospectsand Opportunities, U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, prepared for Short Sea Shipping Cooperative(COOP), November 1, 2004.Malone, John, and Matthew P. Tedesco, “Short Sea Shipping (S3) Roadmap,” September 30, 2007.MARAD, Report to Congress on the Performance of Ports and the Intermodal System, June 2005.MARAD, “Major North American Marine Highway Operations,” America’s Marine HighwayInitiative; http://www.marad.dot.gov/MHI/ops/index.aspONR SSS Final Report 80
New Jersey Department of Transportation, Portway Extensions: Concept Development Study,Volume 1, Final Report, September 2003.National Research Council (NRC), “Paying Our Way: Estimating Marginal Social Costs of FreightTransportation” Transportation Research Board (TRB), Special Report 246: NAS Press, 1996.New York University, Rudin Center and Rutgers University, Bi-State Domestic Freight FerriesStudy, prepared by Allison de Cerreno, Martin Robins, Pippa Woods, Anne Strauss-Wieder, RyanYeung, September 2006.Reeves & Associates, “Analysis of the Potential Market for Short Sea Shipping Services over thePorts of Fall River and New Bedford,” prepared for the Massachusetts Department of Business andTechnology and Seaport Advisory Council, March 29, 2006.SeaBridge, “Shipper Concerns on Near Coastal Trade,” Steven Flott, Chairman, SeaBridge OverseasHoldings Ltd., Marine Transportation System SSS Conference, November 5, 2003.SCOOP (Short Sea Shipping Cooperative Program), “Short-Sea Vessel Service and HarborMaintenance Tax,” National Ports and Waterways Institute (NPWI), University of New Orleans,October 2005.University of New Orleans, National Ports and Waterways Institute, “The Public Benefits of theShort-Sea Intermodal System,” Prepared for the Short Sea Cooperative Program (SCOOP),November 2004.University of Virginia, “Inland Waterways Intermodal Transportation System Design and FeasibilityAnalysis,” May 2005.U.S. DOT, “National Strategy to Reduce Congestion on America’s Transportation Network,” May2006.USCG and NOAA, “Real Time Tide and Current Data Systems in United States Ports:Implementation Status, Safety and Efficiency Needs Expansion Plan,” A Report to Congress, July2000.Volpe Center, “Theater Support Vessel (TSV) Evaluation” report prepared for the U.S. Army Tankautomotive& Armaments Command, November 2007.Waterfront Coalition, National Marine Container Transportation System: A Call to Action, May 2005http://www.portmod.org/news/press/White%20Paper.htmONR SSS Final Report 81
Page 1 and 2:
Appendix GAssessment of Short-Sea S
Page 3 and 4:
6-1-2 Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT)
Page 5 and 6:
PrefaceThis report has been prepare
Page 7 and 8:
Section 1.0 Short Sea Shipping in t
Page 9 and 10:
1-2 Waterway Infrastructure and Fac
Page 11 and 12:
grown twofold (from 1.3 billion ton
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 3 - Trends in Domestic Water
Page 15 and 16:
The SSS/Marine Highway services ide
Page 17 and 18:
Table 2 (Continued)Current SSS Corr
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 8 - Gulf Coast and America's
Page 21 and 22:
2-2 Current SSS Markets and Carrier
Page 23 and 24:
The above list of COB carriers does
Page 25 and 26:
Alaska North Slope. The ATBs’ car
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 16 - LoLo Barge at Pier, Osp
Page 29 and 30: Between 1994 and 1999 Matson ran a
Page 31 and 32: Figure 18 - Envisioned West Coast S
Page 33 and 34: 3-2 Requirements for Viable SSS Ser
Page 35 and 36: 37Lack of volume commitment in a co
Page 37 and 38: volumes, density and direction, mar
Page 39 and 40: economies within the corridor are t
Page 41 and 42: Section 4.0 Vessels and their Relat
Page 43 and 44: percent of U.S. consumption of petr
Page 45 and 46: 7. Liberty Global Logistics (1 RO/R
Page 47 and 48: Figure 22 - Austal JHSVSource: Aust
Page 49 and 50: Figure 24 - Hopper Barge Loaded wit
Page 51 and 52: hull structure of the tug. The end
Page 53 and 54: Section 5.0 SSS Costs: Direct Const
Page 55 and 56: Table 11 - Optimal SSS Speed and RF
Page 57 and 58: pollution, accidents, highway conge
Page 59 and 60: Table 14 - Fuel Usage and Emission
Page 61 and 62: 5-4 Estimating Reduced Costs of Mee
Page 63 and 64: are based on different assumptions
Page 65 and 66: often need to be conducted in tande
Page 67 and 68: development of markets for construc
Page 69 and 70: 6-1-3 Challenges Arising from the F
Page 71 and 72: hour could deliver the same contain
Page 73 and 74: Conventional subsidy programs that
Page 75 and 76: embarking on its second funding ini
Page 77 and 78: and max weight. The system produces
Page 79: LoLoMARADMTSNCHRPNPWIONROPAOSGOSVPA
show all

Office of Naval Research - National Transportation Library

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?