10.07.2015 Views

King Asoka and Buddhism - Urban Dharma

King Asoka and Buddhism - Urban Dharma

King Asoka and Buddhism - Urban Dharma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y Ratanapala of Thail<strong>and</strong> in 1517, gives a one pageaccount of Aśoka which summarizes accurately the maininformation contained in the Sri Lankan sources. Neitherdistance nor time has interfered with the consistency ofthe details.43. Vinaya Piṭakaṃ, Vol. I (Mahāvagga), edited by H. Oldenberg(London: PTS, 1969), p. 1ii.44. Discussed in my article, “Emperor Aśoka <strong>and</strong> <strong>Buddhism</strong>:Some Unresolved Discrepancies in Buddhist Tradition<strong>and</strong> Aśokan Inscriptions.” See, in particular, note 11,above pp. 62 – 63.45. Thapar, p. 2.46. Ibid., p. 42. This level of critical objectivity is not seen inRomila Thapar’s belaboured argument that Jalauka ofRājatarangiṇī was the same as Kuṇāla. See p. 189.47. As stated in note 42 the original tradition first recordedin Sri Lankan Pali sources is found without any changein all acounts of the Third Council <strong>and</strong> of the establishmentof <strong>Buddhism</strong> in Sri Lanka, found in chronicles ofthe Theravāda countries. The discovery of manuscriptsof an extended version of the Mahāvaṃsa in Khmer scriptin Paris <strong>and</strong> Colombo is indicative of the prevalence ofSri Lankan chronicles in Southeast Asia. See E. Hardy,“Kambodian Mahāvaṃsa,” JRAS (1902), p. 171: JPTS(1902 – 1903), pp. 61 ff.48. Mhv., V, 62 – 72. Cf. MRE I: “I have been a Buddhist laymanfor more than two <strong>and</strong> a half years but for a year Idid not make much progress. Now for more than a year230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!