to view the WARR Strategy. - Liverpool City Council - NSW ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Single Unit Dwellings$15$10Eco $/hhld/yr$5$0Existing Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Option 7-$5-$10Multi Unit Dwellings$15$10Eco $/hhld/yr$5$0Existing Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6 Option 7-$5-$10Figure 5.7: Relative Environmental Savings - Resource Conservation (Eco$/hhld/yr)Liverpool City Council45Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy
c) Technical PerformanceIn IRIS the technical assessment of alternative systems focuses on the performance oflandfilling of garbage versus alternative waste treatment. The existing system, togetherwith Option 7, involves landfilling of domestic garbage hence their technical performance isthe same. For Options 1 to 6, garbage is processed using an MBT process. Its technicalperformance differs to that of landfilling.In assessing relative technical performance, eight criteria are used. Results are summarisedgraphically in Figure 5.8. Landfills outperform MBT technologies for the following threecriteria:• Flexibility in Feedstock Quality: Landfill technical performance is not impacted by thecomposition of incoming wastes. MBT technologies may require quality control,removal of contaminants and some blending for optimal processing.• Staffing: For landfilling, relatively small numbers of staff are required and thetechnical skills required from staff are relatively low and are readily available locally.• Operational Reliability: Landfills have high operational reliability, reference facilitydata indicates high availability over long periods of continuous operation.MBT processing outperforms landfilling for the technical criteria of System Modularity;Process Control; Efficiency in Waste Reduction; and Area Requirements. Both technologiesperform equally under the technical criterion of Proven Technology.8Relative Performance6420Landfill (Existing, Option 7) MBT (Options 1 - 6)Flexibility in Feedstock QualityProcess ControlProven Technology / Reference FacilitiesArea RequiredModularity of SystemStaff RequirementsEfficiency in Waste ReductionOperational ReliabilityFigure 5.8: Relative Technical PerformanceLiverpool City Council46Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy
Page 3: TABLE OF CONTENTSPART 1: ..........
Page 6 and 7: 1 INTRODUCTIONLiverpool City Counci
Page 8 and 9: 2 BACKGROUNDTo provide the framewor
Page 10 and 11: In the period 1991 to 2001, the pop
Page 12 and 13: Table 3.3 Domestic Waste Collection
Page 14: 3.4.2 CurrentThe total current (200
Page 17 and 18: Dirt/Ash/Ceramics,6%Other, 13%Hazar
Page 19 and 20: 3.6.1 Kerbside Recycling Yield, Con
Page 21 and 22: Table 3.7: Comparison of DEC-Prefer
Page 23 and 24: Increased diversion can be achieved
Page 25 and 26: 4 WASTE LEGISLATION AND POLICY4.1 L
Page 27 and 28: • Reducing toxic substances in pr
Page 29 and 30: amounts to increasing the resource
Page 31 and 32: 5 TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE EVALUATION OF
Page 33 and 34: OptionSingle Unit Dwellings Multi U
Page 35 and 36: Option 4For this option, garbage is
Page 40 and 41: • Assessment of alternative waste
Page 42 and 43: OptionTable 5.4: Assumed Extent of
Page 44 and 45: OptionGarbageTable 5.5: System Cost
Page 46 and 47: ) Environmental PerformanceThe envi
Page 48 and 49: Single Unit Dwellings2.0E+07Load CV
Page 52 and 53: 5.2.4 ConclusionsOn the basis of th
Page 54 and 55: 6 ACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
Page 56 and 57: Waste Avoidanceand Resource Recover
Page 58 and 59: d) Action MatrixKey Actions Timefra
Page 60 and 61: Key Actions Timeframe Groups Involv
Page 64 and 65: The materials currently recovered f
Page 68 and 69: 6.4 Charging for Waste Management S
Page 70 and 71: Key Actions Timeframe Groups Involv
Page 72 and 73: Liverpool City Council (2004), Soci
Page 76 and 77: 6.7 Development Controls for Waste
Page 78 and 79: 6.8 Commercial and Industrial Waste
Page 80 and 81: 6.9 Household Clean-upa) Strategic
Page 82 and 83: 6.10 Multi Unit Dwellingsa) Strateg
Page 84: 6.11 Illegal Dumpinga) Strategic Ob
Page 88 and 89: 6.12 Problem Wastesa) Strategic Obj
Page 92 and 93: 6.13 Recovery and Disposal of Counc
Page 94 and 95: Resource NSW (2003), Specification
Page 96 and 97: NSW Department of Environment and C
Page 98 and 99: 7 CONCLUSIONSFrom the assessment of
Page 100 and 101:
8 REFERENCESDEC NSW & UNSW (2003),
Page 102 and 103:
Appendix AReview of Waste-Related L
Page 104:
However, it should be noted that th
show all

to view the WARR Strategy. - Liverpool City Council - NSW ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?