to view the WARR Strategy. - Liverpool City Council - NSW ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The materials currently recovered from kerbside recycling (Table 6.1) are consistent with DEC’spreferred range of materials as outlined in their Good practice performance measures forkerbside recycling systems. It is noted that, as Council’s kerbside recycling contract comes upfor renewal, there may be scope to expand the range of materials (especially plastics) thatcan be collected and recovered. Other products that are non-toxic and could potentially becollected by kerbside systems include clothing, small appliances (toaster, kettles, irons, etc)other consumer recyclables (phones, compact discs, video cassettes, books, batteries). Theinclusion of these materials is subject to price considerations, Extended ProducerResponsibility schemes, as well as availability of reprocessing infrastructure and markets.Council does not currently provide:Garden organics collection service;Commercial waste or recycling collection services.In developing this Strategy a Triple Bottom line (TBL) assessment of different core serviceprovision options, including estimate of costs and environmental effects for each option, wasundertaken (see Section 5). On the basis of the assessment, the recommended future wasteand recycling services comprised Options 1, 2 or 3 as detailed in Section 5.On the basis of community feedback during consultation, assessments of separated organicscollections by DEC, and in order to meet strategic objectives of maximising resource recovery,the three bin system identified as Option 1 in combination with AWT is the preferredcollection system.Table 6.2: Future Waste and Recycling Service Collection SystemOptionDwellingTypeGarbage ServiceKerbside RecyclingServiceOrganics RecyclingServiceOption 1 SUDs 120 L binscollected weekly,MBT processingMUDs240 L binscollected weekly,MBT processing240 L fullycommingledrecycling bincollectedfortnightly240 L fullycommingledrecycling bincollectedfortnightly (1)240 L gardenorganics bincollectedfortnightlyService only whereorganics levelgenerated requirescollection(1)Dependent on recycling trials proposed under Section 6.10: Multi-unit dwellingsFrom an implementation perspective Council may choose to implement a system similar tothat assumed for Option 2 or 3 using AWT (depending on the outcome of future tenders forCouncil’s residual waste processing/disposal – see Section 6.2). Following implementationand assessment of (financial and environmental) performance, Council may choose toexpand its service provision through the introduction of a garden organics collection service.Liverpool City Council59Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy
c) Information SourcesDepartment of Environment and Conservation & NSW Jurisdictional Recycling Group (2004),Getting more from our recycling systems. Good practice performance measures for kerbsiderecycling systems, February 2004DEC NSW (2005), Getting more from our Resource Recovery systems: Model Waste CollectionContracts, User Guide and Model specifications and clauses, May 2005DEC NSW (2005), Waste and Resource Recovery: Service Development Timeline, May 2005DEC NSW (2005), Assessment of garden organics collection systems, May 2005Liverpool City Council60Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy
Page 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPART 1: ..........
Page 6 and 7:
1 INTRODUCTIONLiverpool City Counci
Page 8 and 9:
2 BACKGROUNDTo provide the framewor
Page 10 and 11:
In the period 1991 to 2001, the pop
Page 12 and 13:
Table 3.3 Domestic Waste Collection
Page 14: 3.4.2 CurrentThe total current (200
Page 17 and 18: Dirt/Ash/Ceramics,6%Other, 13%Hazar
Page 19 and 20: 3.6.1 Kerbside Recycling Yield, Con
Page 21 and 22: Table 3.7: Comparison of DEC-Prefer
Page 23 and 24: Increased diversion can be achieved
Page 25 and 26: 4 WASTE LEGISLATION AND POLICY4.1 L
Page 27 and 28: • Reducing toxic substances in pr
Page 29 and 30: amounts to increasing the resource
Page 31 and 32: 5 TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE EVALUATION OF
Page 33 and 34: OptionSingle Unit Dwellings Multi U
Page 35 and 36: Option 4For this option, garbage is
Page 40 and 41: • Assessment of alternative waste
Page 42 and 43: OptionTable 5.4: Assumed Extent of
Page 44 and 45: OptionGarbageTable 5.5: System Cost
Page 46 and 47: ) Environmental PerformanceThe envi
Page 48 and 49: Single Unit Dwellings2.0E+07Load CV
Page 50 and 51: Single Unit Dwellings$15$10Eco $/hh
Page 52 and 53: 5.2.4 ConclusionsOn the basis of th
Page 54 and 55: 6 ACTION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
Page 56 and 57: Waste Avoidanceand Resource Recover
Page 58 and 59: d) Action MatrixKey Actions Timefra
Page 60 and 61: Key Actions Timeframe Groups Involv
Page 68 and 69: 6.4 Charging for Waste Management S
Page 70 and 71: Key Actions Timeframe Groups Involv
Page 72 and 73: Liverpool City Council (2004), Soci
Page 76 and 77: 6.7 Development Controls for Waste
Page 78 and 79: 6.8 Commercial and Industrial Waste
Page 80 and 81: 6.9 Household Clean-upa) Strategic
Page 82 and 83: 6.10 Multi Unit Dwellingsa) Strateg
Page 84: 6.11 Illegal Dumpinga) Strategic Ob
Page 88 and 89: 6.12 Problem Wastesa) Strategic Obj
Page 92 and 93: 6.13 Recovery and Disposal of Counc
Page 94 and 95: Resource NSW (2003), Specification
Page 96 and 97: NSW Department of Environment and C
Page 98 and 99: 7 CONCLUSIONSFrom the assessment of
Page 100 and 101: 8 REFERENCESDEC NSW & UNSW (2003),
Page 102 and 103: Appendix AReview of Waste-Related L
Page 104: However, it should be noted that th
show all

to view the WARR Strategy. - Liverpool City Council - NSW ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?