Reply Brief in Support of KSR's Motion for Summary ... - Fried Frank

,e ePlaintiffTeleflex Incorporated ("Teleflex") and non-party Technology Holding Company("THe") having agreed to dismiss with prejudiceUnited States Patent No. 6,305,239 ("the '239Patent"), in light of French Patent Application No. 2,739,947 ("the Urset Patent"), and todedicate the '239 Patent to the public under 35 V.S.C. § 253.And Teleflex and THC having agreed to dismiss with prejudice United States Patent No.6,374,695 ("the '695 Patent"), in light ofme Urset Patent, and to dedicate the '695 Patentto thepublic under 35 V.S.C. § 253.And in accordance with the stipulation to that effect, and the Court being otherwise fullyadvised in the premses;IT IS ORDERED that Count II of Teleflex' s Second Amended Complaint, relating to the'239 Patent, be dismissed with prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count III ofTeleflex's Complaint, relatig to the '695Patent, be dismissed with prejudice., IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Cour makes no finding with respect to the validityor invalidity of the '239 Patent.IT is FURTHER ORDERED that ths Court makes no finding with respect to the validityor invalidity of ,the '695 Patent.IT is FURTHER ORDERED that ths Cour makes no fiding wit respect to theingement or non-jningement of the '239 Patent by any products manufactured, offered forsale, or sold by KSR International Co. ("KSR").2