11.07.2015 Views

Reply Brief in Support of KSR's Motion for Summary ... - Fried Frank

Reply Brief in Support of KSR's Motion for Summary ... - Fried Frank

Reply Brief in Support of KSR's Motion for Summary ... - Fried Frank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Serial Number: 09/643,422Page :2Ar Unit: 3747DETAllED ACTIONHousekeep<strong>in</strong>gApplicat(s) is(are) suggested to Iist a curent telephone number, a facsimile number and athe atorney/applicant <strong>for</strong> each response tò thelist <strong>of</strong> the atachments, ifany, under the,signature <strong>of</strong>the application.Offce action(s) <strong>in</strong> order toexpedite and make accurate the prosecution <strong>of</strong>1. The submission <strong>of</strong> the Inormation Disclosure Statement dated Augut 22, 2000 has beenreceived and fuly considered. No fuer Inormation Disclosure Statement is <strong>in</strong> the records.Draw<strong>in</strong>gs2. The drawigs are objected to iider 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawigs.must show everyfeatue <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>vention specifed <strong>in</strong> the clai. There<strong>for</strong>e, the screw drive <strong>in</strong> c1ai 23 must beshown orthe featue(s) canceled from the clai(s). No new mattr should be entered~Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 1033. The followig is a quotation <strong>of</strong>3S U.S.C. 10~(a) which <strong>for</strong>ms the basis <strong>for</strong>al obviousnessrejections set <strong>for</strong>t<strong>in</strong> ths Offce action:(a) A patnt may not be obtaned though the <strong>in</strong>vention is not identically disclósed or described as set <strong>for</strong>t <strong>in</strong>section 102 <strong>of</strong> ths title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior ar aresuch ihatthe subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the <strong>in</strong>vention was made to a person thehav<strong>in</strong>g ordiar skill <strong>in</strong> the art to which said subject matr perta<strong>in</strong>s. Patentabilty shall not be negatived bymanner <strong>in</strong> wluh the<strong>in</strong>ventlon was mae. '

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!