11.07.2015 Views

The Pythagorean Theorem - Educational Outreach

The Pythagorean Theorem - Educational Outreach

The Pythagorean Theorem - Educational Outreach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.10] Ohio and the Elusive Calculus ProofElisha Loomis (1852-1940), was a Professor ofMathematics, active Mason, and contemporary of PresidentGarfield. Loomis taught at a number of Ohio colleges andhigh schools, finally retiring as mathematics departmenthead for Cleveland West High School in 1923. In 1927,Loomis published a still-actively-cited book entitled <strong>The</strong><strong>Pythagorean</strong> Proposition, a compendium of over 250 proofsof the <strong>Pythagorean</strong> <strong>The</strong>orem—increased to 365 proofs inlater editions. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Pythagorean</strong> Proposition was reissued in1940 and finally reprinted by the National Council ofTeachers of Mathematics in 1968, 2 nd printing 1972, as partof its “Classics in Mathematics Education” Series.Per the <strong>Pythagorean</strong> Proposition, Loomis is creditedwith the following statement; there can be no proof of the<strong>Pythagorean</strong> <strong>The</strong>orem using either the methods oftrigonometry or calculus. Even today, this statementremains largely unchallenged as it is still found with sourcecitation on at least two academic-style websites 1 . Forexample, Jim Loy states on his website, “<strong>The</strong> book <strong>The</strong><strong>Pythagorean</strong> Proposition, by Elisha Scott Loomis, is a fairlyamazing book. It contains 256 proofs of the <strong>Pythagorean</strong><strong>The</strong>orem. It shows that you can devise an infinite number ofalgebraic proofs, like the first proof above. It shows that youcan devise an infinite number of geometric proofs, likeEuclid's proof. And it shows that there can be no proofusing trigonometry, analytic geometry, or calculus. <strong>The</strong>book is out of print, by the way.”That the <strong>Pythagorean</strong> <strong>The</strong>orem is not provable usingthe methods of trigonometry is obvious since trigonometricrelationships have their origin in a presupposed<strong>Pythagorean</strong> right-triangle condition. Hence, any proof bytrigonometry would be a circular proof and logically invalid.However, calculus is a different matter.1 See Math Forum@ Drexel,http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/6259.html ;Jim Loy website,http://www.jimloy.com/geometry/pythag.htm .68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!