27.11.2012 Views

Abstracts of the Academy of Dental Materials Annual ... - IsiRed

Abstracts of the Academy of Dental Materials Annual ... - IsiRed

Abstracts of the Academy of Dental Materials Annual ... - IsiRed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e14 dental materials 26S (2010) e1–e84<br />

Results: Zymograms <strong>of</strong> AEB-treated dentin showed MMP-<br />

2 pr<strong>of</strong>orm (72-kDa) and active form, and a faint band <strong>of</strong><br />

MMP-9 active form, while zymograms <strong>of</strong> CHX-containing<br />

AEB showed complete inhibition <strong>of</strong> MMPs activity. Zymograms<br />

<strong>of</strong> demineralized dentin extracts showed MMP-2 and<br />

-9 active forms (66 and 86-kDa, respectively). No enzymatic<br />

activity was found in proteins extracted from mineralized<br />

dentin.<br />

Conclusions: Human dentin matrices exhibit collagenolytic<br />

and gelatinolytic activity when mixed with<br />

AEB, while <strong>the</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> 0.2% CHX within AEB formulation<br />

resulted in complete inhibition <strong>of</strong> MMP-2 and -9<br />

activity. Fur<strong>the</strong>r in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to<br />

clarify <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong> MMPs inhibitors within<br />

<strong>the</strong> adhesive formulation.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.035<br />

28<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> dentin adhesive on bond strength <strong>of</strong> selfadhesive<br />

cements<br />

F. Ozer, M.B. Blatz, A. Atlas, L. Daneshmehr, K. Kashyap, F.<br />

Mante<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA<br />

Objectives: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to assess and<br />

compare <strong>the</strong> bonding performance <strong>of</strong> four new self-adhesive<br />

and one resin cement to human dentin with and without<br />

application <strong>of</strong> chlorhexidine 2% and a self-etch adhesive<br />

bonding agent.<br />

<strong>Materials</strong> and methods: Occlusal, buccal, lingual, mesial<br />

and distal dentin surfaces <strong>of</strong> 80 human molar teeth were<br />

abraded with #600 SiC-paper directly below <strong>the</strong> enamel. Each<br />

test group comprised 5 teeth and 20 dentin sections (4 sections<br />

for each surface). Four self-adhesive cements ICem(IC),<br />

Clearfil SA Cement (CSA), G-Cem (GC), Bis-Cem (BC) and<br />

one resin cement NX3 were applied to <strong>the</strong> dentinal surfaces<br />

in cylindrical-shaped plastic matrices according to <strong>the</strong><br />

manufacturers’ recommendations with or without application<br />

<strong>of</strong> chlorhexidine 2% and a self-etch adhesive (Protect<br />

Bond). GC-Fuji Plus (FP) group was <strong>the</strong> control. Shear bond<br />

strengths were determined at a cross-head speed <strong>of</strong> 1 mm/min<br />

immediately after application <strong>of</strong> cements to <strong>the</strong> flat dentinal<br />

surfaces. Bond strengths were <strong>the</strong>n calculated and expressed<br />

in MPa. Data were analyzed with ANOVA & Tukey’s HSD<br />

test.<br />

Results:<br />

Cement Bond strength (MPa) ± standard deviation<br />

groups<br />

Intact dentin Protect bond Chlorhexidine<br />

CSA 1.5 ± 0.6 ab 8.5 ± 2.0 fgh 0.5 ± 0.7 a<br />

IC 4.8 ± 1.7 cde 15.7 ± 5.2 j 3.0 ± 1.9 abcd<br />

BC 5.0 ± 2.5 de 12.9 ± 2.7 i 2.3 ± 2.5 abc<br />

GC 6.1 ± 1.6 ef 11.2 ± 2.0 hi 3.9 ± 1.6 bcde<br />

NX3 0.0 12.2 ± 2.6 i 9.4 ± 2 gh<br />

FP 7.9 ± 3.1 fg n/a 6.3 ± 2.2 ef<br />

The same superscripts in <strong>the</strong> table indicate no statistical difference. Protect bond<br />

application dramatically increased bond strength values for all resin cements. FP<br />

and GC showed highest bond strengths to intact dentin surfaces. Chlorhexidine<br />

application decreased bond strengths <strong>of</strong> study cements.<br />

Conclusions: Bond strength values <strong>of</strong> self-adhesive<br />

cements are not reliable without application <strong>of</strong> an adhesive<br />

to dentin surfaces. Application <strong>of</strong> chlorhexidine 2%<br />

to dentin surfaces is not recommended for self-adhesive<br />

cements.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.036<br />

29<br />

Shear-bond strength <strong>of</strong> a new restorative material to primary<br />

dentin<br />

E. Pacifici 1 , A. Giovannetti 2 , C. Goracci 1 , A. Vichi 1 ,A.<br />

Polimeni 2 , M. Ferrari 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Siena, Italy<br />

2 “Sapienza” University <strong>of</strong> Rome, Italy<br />

Objectives: To assess <strong>the</strong> shear bond strength to deciduous<br />

dentin <strong>of</strong> a new self-adhesive flowable resin composite in comparison<br />

with a conventional glass-ionomer cement and with a<br />

flowable composite used in combination with <strong>the</strong> proprietary<br />

etch-and-rinse adhesive.<br />

<strong>Materials</strong> and methods: A flat dentin substrate was<br />

obtained on <strong>the</strong> occlusal surface <strong>of</strong> 40 primary molars by<br />

grinding with wet abrasive paper (320 grit). Teeth were<br />

randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10): OFL, phosphoric<br />

acid [PA]/optibond flow/premise flow (Kerr); IX, polyacrylic<br />

acid/Fuji IX (GC); V, vertise flow (Kerr); PV, PA/vertise flow.<br />

The latter group was included in order to assess <strong>the</strong> contribution<br />

to V bonding mechanism <strong>of</strong> preliminary PA etching.<br />

Using rubber moulds <strong>of</strong> 3 mm in diameter, cylinders <strong>of</strong><br />

restorative material were built-up over <strong>the</strong> dentin surface.<br />

A shear load (1 mm/min crosshead speed) was applied<br />

with a steel blade in a direction parallel to <strong>the</strong> bonded<br />

interface until failure occurred. The failure mode <strong>of</strong> each<br />

specimen was assessed using a stereomicroscope. Bond<br />

strength and failure mode data were statistically analysed.<br />

As shear bond strength data distribution was not normal, <strong>the</strong><br />

Kruskall–Wallis analysis <strong>of</strong> variance was applied followed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Dunn’s Multiple range test (p < 0.05). Differences in failure<br />

mode distribution were assessed with <strong>the</strong> chi-square test<br />

(p < 0.05).<br />

Results: With OFL significantly higher bond strengths than<br />

in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r groups were recorded. Failures were adhesive in<br />

all groups except OFL, in which also cohesive failures in dentin<br />

were observed.<br />

Shear bond strength (MPa) Failure mode (%)<br />

Mean SD Median 25–75% p < 0.05 %Adhesive %Cohesive p < 0.05<br />

OFL 16.02 4.80 17.95 15.48–18.41 A 60% 40% A<br />

IX 6.04 3.75 4.86 4.0–6.82 B 100% 0% B<br />

PV 4.71 1.87 5.30 3.42–6.22 B 100% 0% B<br />

V 4.30 2.66 3.50 3.29–6.27 B 100% 0% B<br />

Conclusions: The new self-adhesive flowable composite<br />

vertise flow produced on deciduous dentin bond strengths<br />

similar to those <strong>of</strong> a conventional glass ionomer cement<br />

that has been routinely used for primary teeth restorations.<br />

Preliminary phosphoric acid etching did not significantly<br />

change vertise flow bonding potential to primary dentin. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!