27.11.2012 Views

Abstracts of the Academy of Dental Materials Annual ... - IsiRed

Abstracts of the Academy of Dental Materials Annual ... - IsiRed

Abstracts of the Academy of Dental Materials Annual ... - IsiRed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

for each ceramic system, maintaining <strong>the</strong> overall total thickness<br />

at 1.3 mm. The thicknesses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> layers were: metal<br />

base disc 0.3 mm, opaque 0.15 mm, dentin opaque 0.35 mm<br />

and 0.45 mm, dentin 0.5 mm and 0.7 mm, enamel 0.1 mm and<br />

0.2 mm. The thickness <strong>of</strong> each layer was verified after each firing.<br />

A clinical spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade) was used<br />

for color comparison in “Restoration” mode, which allows<br />

comparing <strong>the</strong> instrument set color data with <strong>the</strong> measured<br />

ones. The obtained �E values (differences between intended<br />

and obtained shade) were statistically analyzed with a 3-way<br />

ANOVA and <strong>the</strong> Tukey HSD test (˛ = 0.05).<br />

Results:<br />

Shade LS Ceramic �E Significance<br />

2M3 1 VM13 0.98 (0.08) a<br />

Omega 900 0.88 (0.08) a<br />

2 VM13 1.40 (0.12) b<br />

Omega 900 1.94 (0.09) c<br />

3M2 1 VM13 1.06 (0.08) a<br />

Omega 900 1.76 (0.05) c<br />

2 VM13 1.48 (0.08) b<br />

Omega 900 1.48 (0.04) b<br />

4M2 1 VM13 0.96 (0.09) a<br />

Omega 900 1.90 (0.07) c<br />

2 VM13 1.42 (0.08) b<br />

Omega 900 0.96 (0.11) a<br />

Significance column = homogeneous subsets (Tukey HSD test<br />

level = 0.05).<br />

Interaction shade × LS × ceramic (F = 189.62, p < 0.001).<br />

Conclusions: Both Vita VM13 and Vita Omega 900 ceramics<br />

exhibited a close shade match with reference to <strong>the</strong> selected<br />

shades <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vita 3D Master Toothguide. The layering scheme<br />

has influenced <strong>the</strong> final color <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> restorations.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.111<br />

104<br />

Precision <strong>of</strong> different transfer impression techniques in multiple<br />

implants<br />

F.L.G. Cruz 1 , J.C.B. de Faria 2 , F.P.P. Leite 1 , A.P.P. Leite 1 ,Mgam<br />

Chaves 1 , L.R.S. Concílio 2 , A.C.C. Neves 2<br />

1 Universidade Federal De Juiz De Fora, Brazil<br />

2 Universidade de Taubaté, Brazil<br />

Objectives: The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to compare different<br />

materials and techniques used in multiple implant transfer<br />

impressions, measuring <strong>the</strong> gap between superstructure and<br />

implants.<br />

<strong>Materials</strong> and methods: Four external hexagonal implants<br />

(Neodent, Curitiba, Brazil) were fixed in a master cast and<br />

over a superstructure. Afterwards, <strong>the</strong> impressions were made<br />

using polye<strong>the</strong>r (Impregum, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany) and<br />

condensation silicone (Speedex, Coltène AG, Altstatten SG,<br />

Swiss), using open and closed tray techniques with splinted<br />

and non-splinted implant transfers. Auto (Duralay) or photopolymerized<br />

(Duolay) acrylic resin was used for <strong>the</strong> splints<br />

dental materials 26S (2010) e1–e84 e49<br />

and <strong>the</strong> implant transfers were splinted, or not, resulting in<br />

sixteen groups with five casts in each. The space between<br />

master superstructure and <strong>the</strong> implants was measured using<br />

a microscope, with a precision <strong>of</strong> 0.0005 mm and data were<br />

statistically analyzed by T test (=0.05) and Mann–Whitney.<br />

Results: With regard to <strong>the</strong> impression material tested, no<br />

significant differences were observed, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> groups that used photopolymerized Duolay resin to splint<br />

transfers (groups 7 and 15) (p = 0.012). Regarding splint material,<br />

no significant differences were observed, except for <strong>the</strong><br />

groups that employed autopolymerized Duralay (group 4) and<br />

photopolymerized Duolay (group 8) for <strong>the</strong> splint, and that<br />

were subsequently re-splinted (p = 0.004) with autopolymerized<br />

Duolay (group 5) and photopolymerized Duolay (group<br />

7) (p = 0.012). When comparing <strong>the</strong> techniques with divided<br />

and re-splinted techniques with non-divided techniques, no<br />

significant differences were observed (group 3 × group 4 –<br />

p = 0.158; group 5 × group 6 – p = 0.094; group 7 × group 8 –<br />

p = 0.144; group 11 × group 12 – p = 0.331; group 13 × group 14<br />

– p = 0.203; and group 15 × group 16 – p = 0.092).<br />

Conclusions: The impression materials provided similar<br />

results, favoring <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> condensed silicone due to its lower<br />

cost. The autopolymerized acrylic resin was better than photopolymerized<br />

resin for use in <strong>the</strong> splint implant transfers.<br />

The techniques with splinted transfers or non-splinted transfers<br />

provided similar results.<br />

doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.112<br />

105<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal aging on zirconia crystal phases and<br />

strength<br />

R. Dittmann ∗ , E. Mecher, A. Schmalzl, T. Kuretzky<br />

3M ESPE, AG, Seefeld, Germany<br />

Objectives: Yttria-stabilized zirconia is a state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> art<br />

material for all ceramic dental restorations. In humid atmosphere<br />

tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation can<br />

slowly occur at <strong>the</strong> outer surface <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zirconia ceramic<br />

(Chevalier et al. J Am Ceram Soc 1999;82(8):2150). The purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate <strong>the</strong> phase transformation <strong>of</strong><br />

two dental zirconia materials due to hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal accelerated<br />

aging and <strong>the</strong> effect on biaxial fracture strength.<br />

<strong>Materials</strong> and methods: Disks (d =14mm, t = 1.5 mm) were<br />

prepared from Lava Frame zirconia (3M ESPE) and a commercial<br />

available generic dental zirconia. The samples were<br />

sintered according to <strong>the</strong> recommendations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> manufacturers,<br />

grinded plane-parallel and final polished on one side<br />

with a 1 �m diamond suspension. Afterwards all samples were<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmally etched at 1350 ◦ C for 30 min to avoid effects <strong>of</strong> phase<br />

transformation induced by grinding and polishing.<br />

Samples <strong>of</strong> both zirconia materials were split into two<br />

groups (n = 15 each group). One group <strong>of</strong> each material was<br />

characterized initially and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r group was hydro<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

aged in a steam autoclave at 135 ◦ C, 2 bar for 5 h.<br />

X-ray measurements were performed on n = 5 samples each<br />

group in Bragg-Brentano geometry (Bruker D8 Discover) and<br />

quantitative phase analysis were done by <strong>the</strong> Rietveld method<br />

(Bruker TOPAS s<strong>of</strong>tware). Biaxial fracture strength measure-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!