SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CASE 1 –Phelps v Hillingdon B.C.& Others• The findings of the HOL’s:• The Educational Psychologist owed a duty of care to thechild assessed• The child and her parents relied on the advice given• The LEA were vicariously liable• The assessment was negligent• Consequences: The girl was unable to proceed to theemployment envisaged• £44,000 damages were awarded for loss offuture earnings
CASE 1 –Phelps v Hillingdon B.C.& Others• Implications of HOL’s Findings:• LEA’s have a legal duty to ensure that pupil’sSEN are met• LEA’s are liable for the negligent actions of aneducational psychologist and potentially otherofficers and agents
Page 1 and 2: SPECIAL EDUCATIONALNEEDSAn introduc
Page 3 and 4: Five Stages in the Code of Practice
Page 5 and 6: Article 2, Protocol 1(ECHR)‣ Sche
Page 7 and 8: Article 14(ECHR)‣ School discipli
Page 9 and 10: Article 23 (UNCRC)‣ Article 23 st
Page 11 and 12: Special Educational Provision‣ No
Page 13 and 14: Key Human Rights Issues forChildren
Page 15 and 16: Key Human Rights Issues forChildren
Page 17: CASE 1 -Phelps v Hillingdon B.C.& O
Page 21 and 22: Suggested Actions• What can schoo
Page 23 and 24: Suggested Actions It is good practi

SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?