You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Do bailouts work?<br />
Comeback kid<br />
Keynes?<br />
Government bailouts enjoyed a worldwide renaissance during<br />
the recession, but what do they actually achieve? Nils aus dem Moore<br />
asks whether the kind of intervention favored by British economist<br />
John Meynard Keynes serves any purpose<br />
RESCUE PLANS: Do they work? There’s<br />
never been a better time to ask this<br />
question, never in human history have<br />
these plans been used on such a large<br />
scale by so many countries. On average,<br />
they cost around 2% of GDP in<br />
2009, and 1.6% in 2010. An IMF<br />
analysis shows that the biggest bailouts<br />
were in the United States, with a budgeted total of<br />
4.8% of GDP in 2009 and 2010, followed by China (4.4%)<br />
and Germany (3.4%). Another study, by the Brookings<br />
Institution in Washington, D.C., shows that the nature and<br />
size of the rescue packages varied a great deal. For example,<br />
Brazil and Russia relied almost entirely on tax cuts, while<br />
China and India focused on investment. In the European<br />
Union alone, over 350 individual programs had been agreed<br />
upon by February 2009.<br />
A detailed study by the Brussels think-tank Bruegel found<br />
that countries varied a great deal in their emphasis on the<br />
fi ve key components of a bailout: government investment,<br />
temporary or permanent tax cuts, welfare increases, employment<br />
programs, and aid for specifi c sectors. Germany<br />
implemented a large package of all fi ve, Britain relied mainly<br />
on a temporary reduction in VAT, Austria created permanent<br />
tax cuts, and Poland relied solely on infrastructure<br />
investment.<br />
So were the programs successful? At first<br />
sight, Germany appears to tick all the boxes; the<br />
Eurozone’s biggest economy saw a 5% slump<br />
in output during 2009, launched the EU’s<br />
biggest bailout at a cost of EUR 85 bn, and<br />
staged a spectacular comeback in 2010. Since<br />
then, unemployment has reached new lows<br />
and output has risen to pre-recession levels.<br />
This does not prove that the rapid recovery<br />
was caused by the bailout, or prove that<br />
the more money you put into a bailout, the<br />
more you get out. The United States’ experience<br />
has been quite different; according to the Congressional<br />
Budget Office, the American Recovery and Reinvestment<br />
Act (ARRA), passed in February 2009, will have cost USD<br />
830 bn by 2019. In spite of the program’s huge size, the<br />
recovery has been much slower than previous recoveries.<br />
To find out whether bailouts work, it’s not enough simply<br />
to compare different countries and their economies. To<br />
analyze their effectiveness, you have to isolate their impact<br />
20 <strong>THINK</strong> <strong>ACT</strong> SEPTEMBER 2011