28.11.2012 Views

THINK ACT

THINK ACT

THINK ACT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Do bailouts work?<br />

Comeback kid<br />

Keynes?<br />

Government bailouts enjoyed a worldwide renaissance during<br />

the recession, but what do they actually achieve? Nils aus dem Moore<br />

asks whether the kind of intervention favored by British economist<br />

John Meynard Keynes serves any purpose<br />

RESCUE PLANS: Do they work? There’s<br />

never been a better time to ask this<br />

question, never in human history have<br />

these plans been used on such a large<br />

scale by so many countries. On average,<br />

they cost around 2% of GDP in<br />

2009, and 1.6% in 2010. An IMF<br />

analysis shows that the biggest bailouts<br />

were in the United States, with a budgeted total of<br />

4.8% of GDP in 2009 and 2010, followed by China (4.4%)<br />

and Germany (3.4%). Another study, by the Brookings<br />

Institution in Washington, D.C., shows that the nature and<br />

size of the rescue packages varied a great deal. For example,<br />

Brazil and Russia relied almost entirely on tax cuts, while<br />

China and India focused on investment. In the European<br />

Union alone, over 350 individual programs had been agreed<br />

upon by February 2009.<br />

A detailed study by the Brussels think-tank Bruegel found<br />

that countries varied a great deal in their emphasis on the<br />

fi ve key components of a bailout: government investment,<br />

temporary or permanent tax cuts, welfare increases, employment<br />

programs, and aid for specifi c sectors. Germany<br />

implemented a large package of all fi ve, Britain relied mainly<br />

on a temporary reduction in VAT, Austria created permanent<br />

tax cuts, and Poland relied solely on infrastructure<br />

investment.<br />

So were the programs successful? At first<br />

sight, Germany appears to tick all the boxes; the<br />

Eurozone’s biggest economy saw a 5% slump<br />

in output during 2009, launched the EU’s<br />

biggest bailout at a cost of EUR 85 bn, and<br />

staged a spectacular comeback in 2010. Since<br />

then, unemployment has reached new lows<br />

and output has risen to pre-recession levels.<br />

This does not prove that the rapid recovery<br />

was caused by the bailout, or prove that<br />

the more money you put into a bailout, the<br />

more you get out. The United States’ experience<br />

has been quite different; according to the Congressional<br />

Budget Office, the American Recovery and Reinvestment<br />

Act (ARRA), passed in February 2009, will have cost USD<br />

830 bn by 2019. In spite of the program’s huge size, the<br />

recovery has been much slower than previous recoveries.<br />

To find out whether bailouts work, it’s not enough simply<br />

to compare different countries and their economies. To<br />

analyze their effectiveness, you have to isolate their impact<br />

20 <strong>THINK</strong> <strong>ACT</strong> SEPTEMBER 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!