28.11.2012 Views

THINK ACT

THINK ACT

THINK ACT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REPORT: THE MODULAR ECONOMY<br />

“When should companies outsource parts of their<br />

production to others who do certain things better,<br />

than they do?”<br />

have traditionally attracted more sympathy than<br />

Goliaths. Of course, Glenn Reynolds’ opinions are<br />

generalizations. Yes, these success stories do exist,<br />

and technological standardization and the Internet<br />

make life easier for small businesses, but the army of<br />

David’s theory is based largely on anecdotes.<br />

Look more closely and you soon realize that<br />

mass production and distribution are expanding<br />

inexorably. The online world is dominated by behemoths<br />

like Amazon, Google, Facebook and Zynga,<br />

and they’re getting bigger by the month. Offline,<br />

car manufacturers form alliances with big players<br />

in the electrochemical industry, and the insurance<br />

industry continues to consolidate, McDonald’s<br />

has cruised out of the doldrums and is expanding<br />

globally, and many big banks are riding the crest<br />

of a wave again.<br />

Reynolds’ opinions are still thought-provoking.<br />

They prompt us to ask an old but important business<br />

question from a new perspective: how vertically<br />

integrated do companies need to be in order to<br />

collaborate effectively in ecosystems? Or to put it<br />

another way, when should they outsource part of<br />

their production to others who do a better job?<br />

One person who tried to answer this question<br />

was awarded a Nobel Prize for his efforts. The<br />

British economist Ronald Coase won the Nobel<br />

Prize in 1991 for his essay The Nature of the Firm,<br />

written more than fifty years prior in 1937. In his<br />

work, he expressed doubts about the Ford business<br />

model, which involved doing everything in-house<br />

from start to finish. In those days, Ford didn’t<br />

just concentrate on building good cars; it made its<br />

own steel, generated its own power, made its own<br />

windshield glass, and sold cars directly to customers.<br />

To a socialist economist, this was inefficient, and<br />

the solution was the Coase theorem, a milestone in<br />

economic history.<br />

The theorem says that there are always transaction<br />

costs involved in the division of labor and that<br />

these can be divided into categories. There are search<br />

costs, the cost of finding things such as employees,<br />

capital, materials, and information about production<br />

processes; there are contract costs, the costs<br />

of negotiating agreements, such as lawyers’ fees;<br />

finally, there are coordination costs which are the<br />

costs of the effort involved in ensuring that everyone<br />

involved works together efficiently. Coase concluded<br />

that companies would always seek vertical integration<br />

if their bottom-line external transaction costs<br />

were higher than the cost of the employees doing<br />

the job in-house.<br />

The Power of small parts<br />

The one thing that has changed since Coase analyzed<br />

Ford’s vertically integrated production is transaction<br />

costs. Today’s economy works on the Lego principle;<br />

the bricks snap neatly together, they don’t fall apart,<br />

and they can be combined in many different ways.<br />

Over the last few decades, the supply chain has<br />

28 <strong>THINK</strong> <strong>ACT</strong> SEPTEMBER 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!