You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
REPORT: THE MODULAR ECONOMY<br />
“When should companies outsource parts of their<br />
production to others who do certain things better,<br />
than they do?”<br />
have traditionally attracted more sympathy than<br />
Goliaths. Of course, Glenn Reynolds’ opinions are<br />
generalizations. Yes, these success stories do exist,<br />
and technological standardization and the Internet<br />
make life easier for small businesses, but the army of<br />
David’s theory is based largely on anecdotes.<br />
Look more closely and you soon realize that<br />
mass production and distribution are expanding<br />
inexorably. The online world is dominated by behemoths<br />
like Amazon, Google, Facebook and Zynga,<br />
and they’re getting bigger by the month. Offline,<br />
car manufacturers form alliances with big players<br />
in the electrochemical industry, and the insurance<br />
industry continues to consolidate, McDonald’s<br />
has cruised out of the doldrums and is expanding<br />
globally, and many big banks are riding the crest<br />
of a wave again.<br />
Reynolds’ opinions are still thought-provoking.<br />
They prompt us to ask an old but important business<br />
question from a new perspective: how vertically<br />
integrated do companies need to be in order to<br />
collaborate effectively in ecosystems? Or to put it<br />
another way, when should they outsource part of<br />
their production to others who do a better job?<br />
One person who tried to answer this question<br />
was awarded a Nobel Prize for his efforts. The<br />
British economist Ronald Coase won the Nobel<br />
Prize in 1991 for his essay The Nature of the Firm,<br />
written more than fifty years prior in 1937. In his<br />
work, he expressed doubts about the Ford business<br />
model, which involved doing everything in-house<br />
from start to finish. In those days, Ford didn’t<br />
just concentrate on building good cars; it made its<br />
own steel, generated its own power, made its own<br />
windshield glass, and sold cars directly to customers.<br />
To a socialist economist, this was inefficient, and<br />
the solution was the Coase theorem, a milestone in<br />
economic history.<br />
The theorem says that there are always transaction<br />
costs involved in the division of labor and that<br />
these can be divided into categories. There are search<br />
costs, the cost of finding things such as employees,<br />
capital, materials, and information about production<br />
processes; there are contract costs, the costs<br />
of negotiating agreements, such as lawyers’ fees;<br />
finally, there are coordination costs which are the<br />
costs of the effort involved in ensuring that everyone<br />
involved works together efficiently. Coase concluded<br />
that companies would always seek vertical integration<br />
if their bottom-line external transaction costs<br />
were higher than the cost of the employees doing<br />
the job in-house.<br />
The Power of small parts<br />
The one thing that has changed since Coase analyzed<br />
Ford’s vertically integrated production is transaction<br />
costs. Today’s economy works on the Lego principle;<br />
the bricks snap neatly together, they don’t fall apart,<br />
and they can be combined in many different ways.<br />
Over the last few decades, the supply chain has<br />
28 <strong>THINK</strong> <strong>ACT</strong> SEPTEMBER 2011