28.11.2012 Views

THINK ACT

THINK ACT

THINK ACT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>THINK</strong>: BAILOUTS<br />

<strong>ACT</strong><br />

Keynes is back, but<br />

probably not for long.<br />

In a recession, fi nancial<br />

decision-makers should<br />

realize that:<br />

1/ Monetary policy and<br />

the stabilizing role of<br />

tax and transfers are the<br />

best way to smooth<br />

the economic cycle.<br />

2/ Few governments<br />

are able to reduce debt<br />

created by defi cit spending<br />

once the good times<br />

return.<br />

3/ Structural problems<br />

need structural solutions.<br />

Nils aus dem Moore<br />

Columnist<br />

Nils heads the policy and communications<br />

department at the<br />

Berlin offi ce of the economic<br />

research body RWI Essen.<br />

He was formerly an associate<br />

of the Stiftung Neue Verant-<br />

wortung, and worked with<br />

RWI president Christoph M.<br />

Schmidt on the Bundestag’s<br />

commission of inquiry on<br />

growth, prosperity and quality<br />

of life. From 2005 to 2007, aus<br />

How does debt add value?<br />

Similar analysis of other countries’ economic programs has<br />

also been positive. In spite of all the imponderable variables<br />

involved, the bottom line is that without government intervention,<br />

the collapse in output would have been even more<br />

dramatic, and the job losses even greater. So what does this<br />

conclusion mean for future economic policy? In 2009, the<br />

historian and Keynes biographer Robert Skidelsky published<br />

an I-told-you-so tome, “Keynes, the Return of the Master,”<br />

proclaiming a new era of Keynesian government intervention.<br />

Economist Jeffrey Sachs, of Columbia University, contends that<br />

the success of recent bailouts was “the last hurrah of Keynesianism.”<br />

In the foreseeable future, he says, the huge increase in<br />

government debt will limit fi scal room for maneuver.<br />

Sachs may well be right. Many OECD economies are in an<br />

abysmal state, and there are three other reasons why Keynesianism<br />

is unlikely to make a lasting comeback:<br />

First, empirical research indicates that cyclical highs and<br />

lows can be smoothed out by a combination of monetary<br />

policy and the stabilizing effects of tax and transfers. Bailouts<br />

can be counterproductive if they’re slow to take effect, and<br />

in some cases they can actually make the troughs deeper.<br />

Second, during the postwar decades, Keynesian policies<br />

(2)<br />

usually failed in good times to reduce debt caused by defi cit<br />

spending in bad times. Third, current and future challenges Getty<br />

like emissions and demographic change are primarily struc- (2),<br />

tural, and structural problems need structural solutions.<br />

So the message is a nuanced one. During the normal eco- Akhtar<br />

nomic cycle, governments should rely on monetary policy, tax Amin<br />

and transfers to improve their fi nances. Big bailouts should<br />

be an absolute last resort for serious recessions. Photo:<br />

dem Moore edited the business<br />

section of the political<br />

magazine Cicero, and this year<br />

he won the Ludwig Erhard<br />

business journalism prize for<br />

his columns in the magazine.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!