2.1. Observables <strong>and</strong> K<strong>in</strong>ematics 16differ from their RPWIA counterparts of Eqs. (2.7) <strong>and</strong> (2.9) through the presence of the operatorsŜp1, Ŝk1, <strong>and</strong> Ŝk2. These def<strong>in</strong>e the accumulated effect of all <strong>in</strong>teractions that the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g protons undergo <strong>in</strong> their way <strong>in</strong>to <strong>and</strong> out of the target nucleus.S<strong>in</strong>ce the IFSI violate factorization, some additional approximations are <strong>in</strong> order. First, onlycentral IFSI are considered. In both proton-nucleus <strong>and</strong> A(e, e ′ p) scatter<strong>in</strong>g calculations (see,for example, Refs. [59,68]), it has been a common <strong>and</strong> successful practice to neglect sp<strong>in</strong> effects.Hence, we expect a sp<strong>in</strong>less treatment of the IFSI to be quite reasonable for the calculationof A(p, pN) cross sections as well, especially at higher energies, s<strong>in</strong>ce the contribution fromsp<strong>in</strong>-dependent terms decreases rapidly with energy. Of course, sp<strong>in</strong> effects might play a moreprom<strong>in</strong>ent role <strong>in</strong> the description of A(p, 2p) sp<strong>in</strong> observables, but these observables will notbe discussed <strong>in</strong> this work. Further, the zero-range approximation is adopted for the hard NN<strong>in</strong>teraction, allow<strong>in</strong>g one to replace the coord<strong>in</strong>ates of the two <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g protons (⃗r 0 <strong>and</strong> ⃗r 1 )by one s<strong>in</strong>gle collision po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the distort<strong>in</strong>g functions Ŝp1, Ŝ k1 , <strong>and</strong> Ŝk2. This leads to thedistorted momentum-space wave function∫φ D α 1(⃗p m ) = d⃗r e −i⃗pm·⃗r φ α1 (⃗r) ŜIFSI (⃗r) , (2.35)similar to Eq. (B.7), but with the additional IFSI factor∫ ∫Ŝ IFSI (⃗r) = d⃗r 2 · · · d⃗r A |φ α2 (⃗r 2 )| 2 · · · |φ αA (⃗r A )| 2 Ŝ k1 (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , . . . , ⃗r A )account<strong>in</strong>g for the soft IFSI effects.× Ŝk2 (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , . . . , ⃗r A ) Ŝp1 (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , . . . , ⃗r A ) (2.36)Now, along the l<strong>in</strong>es of [69], it is natural to def<strong>in</strong>e a distorted wave amplitudeψ D (⃗p m ) = ū(⃗p m , m s ) φ D α 1(⃗p m ) , (2.37)so that the distorted momentum distribution is given by the square of this amplitude,ρ D (⃗p m ) = 1 ∑ ∑ ∣ (2π) 3 ψ D (⃗p m ) ∣ 2 . (2.38)m m sThis distorted momentum distribution has the follow<strong>in</strong>g properties. First, it takes <strong>in</strong>to accountthe distortions for the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> outgo<strong>in</strong>g protons. Second, it reduces to the plane-wavemomentum distribution 2j+14π |˜α nκ (p m )| 2 <strong>in</strong> the plane-wave limit when assum<strong>in</strong>g that φ α1 (⃗p m )satisfies the relation⃗σ · ⃗pĒ + M pφ u = φ d (2.39)between the upper <strong>and</strong> lower components.Us<strong>in</strong>g the ansatz (2.38) for the distorted momentum distribution, the differential A(p, 2p)cross section can be cast <strong>in</strong> the form(d 5 ) Dσ≈ sM ( )A−1 k 1 k 2dσfrec −1 ρ D pp(⃗p m )dE k1 dΩ 1 dΩ 2 M p M A p 1dΩc.m.. (2.40)It differs from the RPWIA expression (2.30) through the <strong>in</strong>troduction of a “distorted” momentumdistribution ρ D .
Chapter 2. Relativistic Eikonal A(p, pN) Formalism 172.2 Relativistic Optical Model Eikonal Approximation2.2.1 Nucleon-Nucleus Scatter<strong>in</strong>gFollow<strong>in</strong>g the discussion of Refs. [56,70], √we consider the time-<strong>in</strong>dependent Dirac equation fora particle with relativistic energy E = k 2 + MN 2 <strong>and</strong> sp<strong>in</strong> state ∣ 12 m s〉subject to a sphericalLorentz scalar V s (r) <strong>and</strong> vector potential V v (r)Ĥ Ψ (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) = [⃗α · ˆ⃗p + βM N + βV s (r) + V v (r)] Ψ (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) = E Ψ (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) , (2.41)where Ψ (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) is the unbound (scattered) Dirac state <strong>and</strong> ˆ⃗p represents the impulse operator.The <strong>in</strong>fluence of the nuclear medium on the particle is twofold: the scalar potential V s (r) shiftsthe particle mass to an effective value, while the vector potential V v (r) affects the energy term.The scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function Ψ (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) is decomposed <strong>in</strong> an upper <strong>and</strong> a lower component,u (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) <strong>and</strong> w (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r). Some straightforward manipulations lead to a Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger-like equationfor the upper component][− ∇2+ V c (r) + V so (r) (⃗σ ·2M ⃗L − i⃗r · ˆ⃗p) u (+)⃗(⃗r) =Nk,mswhile the lower component is related to the upper one throughw (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) =k22M Nu (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) , (2.42)1E + M N + V s (r) − V v (r) ⃗σ · ˆ⃗p u (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) . (2.43)Here, the central <strong>and</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit potentials V c (r) <strong>and</strong> V so (r) are def<strong>in</strong>ed asV c (r) = V s (r) + E V v (r) + V s 2 (r) − Vv 2 (r),M N 2M N11 dV so (r) =2M N [E + M N + V s (r) − V v (r)] r dr [V v(r) − V s (r)] . (2.44)So far, no approximations have been made. In the relativistic DWIA frameworks [24,25,29,30], the scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function is exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> partial waves√Ψ (+)E + MN ∑⃗(⃗r) = 4πi l 1〈lm l k,ms 2M N2 m s|jm〉 Ylm ∗l(Ω k ) Ψ m κ (⃗r) , (2.45)κmm lwhere Ψ m κ (⃗r) are four-sp<strong>in</strong>ors of the same form as the bound-state wave functions of Eq. (B.4),<strong>and</strong> Eq. (2.41) is solved numerically us<strong>in</strong>g optical potentials. This partial-wave procedure becomesimpractical as the energy <strong>in</strong>creases. Therefore, at higher energies, the Schröd<strong>in</strong>ger-typeequation (2.42) is solved <strong>in</strong> the eikonal approximation [56, 70].Follow<strong>in</strong>g the method outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Ref. [70], the average momentum ⃗ K <strong>and</strong> the momentumtransfer ⃗ ∆ which occur dur<strong>in</strong>g the nucleon-nucleus collision, are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms of thenucleon’s <strong>in</strong>itial ( ⃗ k i ) <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al momentum ( ⃗ k f )⃗K = ⃗ k i + ⃗ k f,2⃗∆ = ⃗ k i − ⃗ k f . (2.46)
- Page 1: FACULTEIT WETENSCHAPPENA RELATIVIST
- Page 8 and 9: Contentsiv
- Page 10 and 11: 2mechanism is obtained than in incl
- Page 12 and 13: 4rely on partial-wave expansions of
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2Relativistic Eikonal Descr
- Page 18 and 19: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 10w
- Page 20 and 21: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 12B
- Page 22 and 23: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 14M
- Page 26 and 27: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 28 and 29: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 30 and 31: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 32 and 33: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 34 and 35: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 36 and 37: 2.4. Approximated RMSGA 2812121010
- Page 38 and 39: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 40 and 41: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 42 and 43: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 44 and 45: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 36sence of ini
- Page 46 and 47: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 38imaginary pa
- Page 48 and 49: 3.2. Radial and Polar-Angle Contrib
- Page 50 and 51: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 52 and 53: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 54 and 55: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 56 and 57: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 58 and 59: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 60 and 61: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 62 and 63: 54Figure 4.1 The beam-momentum depe
- Page 64 and 65: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 66 and 67: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 68 and 69: 4.3. Color Transparency 60of CT. Th
- Page 70 and 71: 4.3. Color Transparency 62with grou
- Page 72 and 73: 4.3. Color Transparency 64with p th
- Page 74 and 75:
4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 76 and 77:
4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 78 and 79:
4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 7
- Page 80 and 81:
4.5. Outlook 72the 7 Li and 12 C da
- Page 82 and 83:
4.5. Outlook 7410.812 C0.6Transpare
- Page 84 and 85:
4.5. Outlook 76
- Page 86 and 87:
5.1. The A(e, e ′ p) Matrix Eleme
- Page 88 and 89:
5.2. Nuclear Transparency 80112 C0.
- Page 90 and 91:
5.3. Induced Normal Polarization 82
- Page 92 and 93:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 84w
- Page 94 and 95:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 860
- Page 96 and 97:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 88d
- Page 98 and 99:
90framework, which is a multiple-sc
- Page 100 and 101:
92be transformed into an amplitude
- Page 102 and 103:
A.2. Pauli Matrices 94A.2 Pauli Mat
- Page 104 and 105:
96pseudo-scalar π mesons, as well
- Page 106 and 107:
980.11ρ chg(e/fm 3 )0.080.060.0440
- Page 108 and 109:
100with∫D r,θ (r, θ) ≡dφ sin
- Page 110 and 111:
Bibliography 102[12] R. A. Arndt, I
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography 104[43] E. D. Cooper,
- Page 114 and 115:
Bibliography 106[71] R. J. Glauber,
- Page 116 and 117:
Bibliography 108[104] S. J. Wallace
- Page 118 and 119:
Bibliography 110[132] C. Baglin et
- Page 120 and 121:
Bibliography 112[163] K. Wijesooriy
- Page 122 and 123:
Bibliography 114[195] L. L. Frankfu
- Page 124 and 125:
Bibliography 116[227] J. Botts, J.-
- Page 126 and 127:
Bibliography 118
- Page 128 and 129:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 120
- Page 130 and 131:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 122we
- Page 132:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 1246