12.07.2015 Views

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2. Relativistic Eikonal A(p, pN) Formalism 19the description of the f<strong>in</strong>al-state <strong>in</strong>teractions (FSI), however, <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g boundary conditionsare appropriate. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to st<strong>and</strong>ard distorted-wave theory [77], the correspond<strong>in</strong>g wavefunction Ψ (−)⃗(⃗r) is related to Ψ (+)k,ms ⃗(⃗r) by time reversal. Under time reversal, the follow<strong>in</strong>gk,mstransformations occur:t → −t ,⃗r → ⃗r ,ˆ⃗p → −ˆ⃗p ,⃗σ → −⃗σ ,⃗L → −L ⃗ ,c → c ∗ ,(2.52)where the last l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dicates that all complex numbers are transformed <strong>in</strong>to their complex conjugates.Thus, Ψ (−)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) satisfies Eqs. (2.41)–(2.43) if the potentials V s (r), V v (r), V c (r), <strong>and</strong> V so (r)are replaced by their complex conjugates. The eikonal solution satisfy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g boundaryconditions then takes the formΨ (−)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) =√ [E + MN2M N(× exp i M NK(× exp i ⃗ )k · ⃗r11E+M N +Vs ∗ (r)−Vv ∗ (r)∫ +∞z⃗σ · ˆ⃗p]dz ′ { V ∗c ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) + V ∗so( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ K − iKz ′ )} )χ 1 , (2.53)ms2or, <strong>in</strong> the conjugate “bra” form <strong>in</strong> which the outgo<strong>in</strong>g wave functions appear <strong>in</strong> the A(p, 2p)matrix element(†√Ψ (−)E + MN(⃗(⃗r))=χ † 1 exp −i k,ms 2M ⃗ )k · ⃗rN 2(ms× exp −i M ∫ +∞ { Ndz ′ V c (K⃗ b, z ′ ) + V so ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ } )K + iKz ′ )z[× 1 −⃗σ · ˆ⃗p]1E+M N +V s(r)−V v(r). (2.54)2.2.2 ROMEA for A(p, pN) ReactionsIn evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the IFSI effects <strong>in</strong> our A(p, pN) calculations, some approximations are <strong>in</strong>troduced.First, the dynamical enhancement of the lower components of the scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave functions(2.51) is neglected <strong>in</strong> our factorized approach, the so-called noSV approximation. For smallmomenta, the lower components play a m<strong>in</strong>or role with respect to the upper ones, due to thefactor ˆ⃗p/(E + M N + V s (r) − V v (r)); while at higher momenta, V s (r) − V v (r) can be disregarded<strong>in</strong> comparison with E + M N . As such, the effect of the dynamical enhancement is not expectedto be important for the A(p, pN) cross sections. Next, the average momentum ⃗ K is approximatedby the asymptotic momenta of the imp<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> outgo<strong>in</strong>g nucleons (⃗p 1 , ⃗ k 1 , <strong>and</strong> ⃗ k 2 ).This is allowed with<strong>in</strong> the small-angle restriction of the EA. Further, <strong>in</strong> the calculation of thescatter<strong>in</strong>g states, the impulse operator ˆ⃗p is replaced by the asymptotic momenta of the nucleons.In literature, this is usually referred to as the effective momentum approximation (EMA),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!