2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eikonal Approximation 18The EA is essentially a small-angle approximation (∆/k i ≪ 1) <strong>and</strong> hence, the follow<strong>in</strong>g operatorialapproximation is made [71]ˆp 2 = [(ˆ⃗p − ⃗ K) + ⃗ K] 2 ≃ 2 ⃗ K · ˆ⃗p − K 2 . (2.47)Through this, the equation for the upper component becomes l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong> the momentum operator:[ {⃗K · ˆ⃗p − K 2 + M N V c (r) + V so (r) (⃗σ · ⃗r × K ⃗ − i⃗r · ⃗K)}]u (+)⃗(⃗r) = 0 , (2.48)k,mswhere the momentum operators <strong>in</strong> the sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit (V so (r) (⃗σ · ⃗r × ˆ⃗p)) <strong>and</strong> Darw<strong>in</strong> terms(V so (r) (−i⃗r · ˆ⃗p)) have been replaced by the average momentum ⃗ K. In the EA, the follow<strong>in</strong>gansatz is postulated for the upper component of the scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function:u (+)⃗(⃗r) ≡ N e i S b eik (⃗r) e i⃗k·⃗r χ 1 , (2.49)k,ms ms2with N a normalization factor. Insert<strong>in</strong>g this expression <strong>in</strong>to Eq. (2.48) yields a differentialequation for the eikonal phase Ŝeik(⃗r), which is an operator <strong>in</strong> sp<strong>in</strong> space. Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the z axisalong the direction of the average momentum ⃗ K, this eikonal phase can be written <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegralform (⃗r ≡ ( ⃗ b, z))i Ŝeik( ⃗ b, z) = −i M NK∫ z−∞{ dz ′ V c ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) + V so ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (⃗σ ·⃗b × K ⃗ }− iKz ′ )In the relativistic eikonal limit, the scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function takes on the form√ []Ψ (+) E + MN1⃗(⃗r) =k,ms 2M N ⃗σ · ˆ⃗p1E+M N +V s(r)−V v(r). (2.50)e i S b eik (⃗r) e i⃗k·⃗r χ 1 . (2.51)ms2It is normalized such that it co<strong>in</strong>cides with the relativistic plane wave (2.8) when ⃗r → −∞.Eq. (2.51) differs from the plane-wave solutions <strong>in</strong> two respects. First, the lower component isdynamically enhanced due to the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the scalar <strong>and</strong> vector potentials V s − V v < 0.Second, the eikonal phase e i b S eik (⃗r) describes the <strong>in</strong>teractions of the nucleon with the nucleus viapotential scatter<strong>in</strong>g. Furthermore, one can identify two primary relativistic effects: the Darw<strong>in</strong>term V so ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (−iKz ′ ) <strong>in</strong> Eq. (2.50) <strong>and</strong> the previously mentioned dynamical enhancement ofthe lower component. The EA reproduces the exact partial-wave results well <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediateenergyproton-nucleus scatter<strong>in</strong>g (T p ≈ 500 MeV) [70] <strong>and</strong> has also been successfully applied<strong>in</strong> A(e, e ′ p) scatter<strong>in</strong>g [56, 57, 72–76].The eikonal phase (2.50) is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by perform<strong>in</strong>g a straight l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tegration along thedirection of ⃗ K. A more accurate computation of the scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function would be obta<strong>in</strong>edby calculat<strong>in</strong>g its phase along the actual curved classical trajectory. Therefore, the useof the EA is only justified for small-angle scatter<strong>in</strong>g. Fortunately, high-energy proton-nucleuscollisions like the soft IFSI <strong>in</strong> A(p, pN) reactions are diffractive <strong>and</strong> extremely forward peaked.The scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function Ψ (+)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) of Eq. (2.51) satisfies outgo<strong>in</strong>g boundary conditions<strong>and</strong> can be used to describe the <strong>in</strong>itial-state <strong>in</strong>teractions (ISI) of the imp<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g proton. For
Chapter 2. Relativistic Eikonal A(p, pN) Formalism 19the description of the f<strong>in</strong>al-state <strong>in</strong>teractions (FSI), however, <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g boundary conditionsare appropriate. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to st<strong>and</strong>ard distorted-wave theory [77], the correspond<strong>in</strong>g wavefunction Ψ (−)⃗(⃗r) is related to Ψ (+)k,ms ⃗(⃗r) by time reversal. Under time reversal, the follow<strong>in</strong>gk,mstransformations occur:t → −t ,⃗r → ⃗r ,ˆ⃗p → −ˆ⃗p ,⃗σ → −⃗σ ,⃗L → −L ⃗ ,c → c ∗ ,(2.52)where the last l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dicates that all complex numbers are transformed <strong>in</strong>to their complex conjugates.Thus, Ψ (−)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) satisfies Eqs. (2.41)–(2.43) if the potentials V s (r), V v (r), V c (r), <strong>and</strong> V so (r)are replaced by their complex conjugates. The eikonal solution satisfy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g boundaryconditions then takes the formΨ (−)⃗ k,ms(⃗r) =√ [E + MN2M N(× exp i M NK(× exp i ⃗ )k · ⃗r11E+M N +Vs ∗ (r)−Vv ∗ (r)∫ +∞z⃗σ · ˆ⃗p]dz ′ { V ∗c ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) + V ∗so( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ K − iKz ′ )} )χ 1 , (2.53)ms2or, <strong>in</strong> the conjugate “bra” form <strong>in</strong> which the outgo<strong>in</strong>g wave functions appear <strong>in</strong> the A(p, 2p)matrix element(†√Ψ (−)E + MN(⃗(⃗r))=χ † 1 exp −i k,ms 2M ⃗ )k · ⃗rN 2(ms× exp −i M ∫ +∞ { Ndz ′ V c (K⃗ b, z ′ ) + V so ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ } )K + iKz ′ )z[× 1 −⃗σ · ˆ⃗p]1E+M N +V s(r)−V v(r). (2.54)2.2.2 ROMEA for A(p, pN) ReactionsIn evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the IFSI effects <strong>in</strong> our A(p, pN) calculations, some approximations are <strong>in</strong>troduced.First, the dynamical enhancement of the lower components of the scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave functions(2.51) is neglected <strong>in</strong> our factorized approach, the so-called noSV approximation. For smallmomenta, the lower components play a m<strong>in</strong>or role with respect to the upper ones, due to thefactor ˆ⃗p/(E + M N + V s (r) − V v (r)); while at higher momenta, V s (r) − V v (r) can be disregarded<strong>in</strong> comparison with E + M N . As such, the effect of the dynamical enhancement is not expectedto be important for the A(p, pN) cross sections. Next, the average momentum ⃗ K is approximatedby the asymptotic momenta of the imp<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> outgo<strong>in</strong>g nucleons (⃗p 1 , ⃗ k 1 , <strong>and</strong> ⃗ k 2 ).This is allowed with<strong>in</strong> the small-angle restriction of the EA. Further, <strong>in</strong> the calculation of thescatter<strong>in</strong>g states, the impulse operator ˆ⃗p is replaced by the asymptotic momenta of the nucleons.In literature, this is usually referred to as the effective momentum approximation (EMA),
- Page 1: FACULTEIT WETENSCHAPPENA RELATIVIST
- Page 8 and 9: Contentsiv
- Page 10 and 11: 2mechanism is obtained than in incl
- Page 12 and 13: 4rely on partial-wave expansions of
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2Relativistic Eikonal Descr
- Page 18 and 19: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 10w
- Page 20 and 21: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 12B
- Page 22 and 23: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 14M
- Page 24 and 25: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 16d
- Page 28 and 29: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 30 and 31: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 32 and 33: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 34 and 35: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 36 and 37: 2.4. Approximated RMSGA 2812121010
- Page 38 and 39: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 40 and 41: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 42 and 43: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 44 and 45: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 36sence of ini
- Page 46 and 47: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 38imaginary pa
- Page 48 and 49: 3.2. Radial and Polar-Angle Contrib
- Page 50 and 51: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 52 and 53: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 54 and 55: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 56 and 57: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 58 and 59: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 60 and 61: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 62 and 63: 54Figure 4.1 The beam-momentum depe
- Page 64 and 65: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 66 and 67: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 68 and 69: 4.3. Color Transparency 60of CT. Th
- Page 70 and 71: 4.3. Color Transparency 62with grou
- Page 72 and 73: 4.3. Color Transparency 64with p th
- Page 74 and 75: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 76 and 77:
4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 78 and 79:
4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 7
- Page 80 and 81:
4.5. Outlook 72the 7 Li and 12 C da
- Page 82 and 83:
4.5. Outlook 7410.812 C0.6Transpare
- Page 84 and 85:
4.5. Outlook 76
- Page 86 and 87:
5.1. The A(e, e ′ p) Matrix Eleme
- Page 88 and 89:
5.2. Nuclear Transparency 80112 C0.
- Page 90 and 91:
5.3. Induced Normal Polarization 82
- Page 92 and 93:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 84w
- Page 94 and 95:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 860
- Page 96 and 97:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 88d
- Page 98 and 99:
90framework, which is a multiple-sc
- Page 100 and 101:
92be transformed into an amplitude
- Page 102 and 103:
A.2. Pauli Matrices 94A.2 Pauli Mat
- Page 104 and 105:
96pseudo-scalar π mesons, as well
- Page 106 and 107:
980.11ρ chg(e/fm 3 )0.080.060.0440
- Page 108 and 109:
100with∫D r,θ (r, θ) ≡dφ sin
- Page 110 and 111:
Bibliography 102[12] R. A. Arndt, I
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography 104[43] E. D. Cooper,
- Page 114 and 115:
Bibliography 106[71] R. J. Glauber,
- Page 116 and 117:
Bibliography 108[104] S. J. Wallace
- Page 118 and 119:
Bibliography 110[132] C. Baglin et
- Page 120 and 121:
Bibliography 112[163] K. Wijesooriy
- Page 122 and 123:
Bibliography 114[195] L. L. Frankfu
- Page 124 and 125:
Bibliography 116[227] J. Botts, J.-
- Page 126 and 127:
Bibliography 118
- Page 128 and 129:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 120
- Page 130 and 131:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 122we
- Page 132:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 1246