2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Corrections 32bution <strong>in</strong> the last term of the right-h<strong>and</strong> side of Eq. (2.83) s<strong>in</strong>ce it is of order V opt /k 3 or higher:∫1 z( 1dz ′ (z − z ′ )2kv −∞b + ∂ ) ∂(V opt (∂b ∂b⃗ b, z ′ ) η( ⃗ )b, z ′ )(1 1=2kv b + ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ (z − z ′ )∂b −∞[∂(× V c (∂b⃗ b, z ′ ) + V so ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ k − ikz )) ]′ η( ⃗ b, z ′ ) . (2.84)Spherical symmetry implies that z ′ ∂V c ( ⃗ b, z ′ )/∂b = b ∂V c ( ⃗ b, z ′ )/∂z ′ . Hence, the z ′ ∂V c /∂b term<strong>in</strong> Eq. (2.84) can be written as− 1 ( 12kv b + ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ b ∂V c( ⃗ b, z ′ )∂b −∞ ∂z ′ η( ⃗ b, z ′ )= − 1 ( 12kv b + ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ b ∂ (∂b −∞ ∂z ′ V c ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) η( ⃗ )b, z ′ )[ (= − 1 2 + b ∂ ) ]V c (2kv ∂b⃗ b, z) η( ⃗ b, z) . (2.85)In the first step, the fact that the derivative ∂η/∂z ′ is of higher order was used to turn the<strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>to an exact differential. A similar reason<strong>in</strong>g, followed by <strong>in</strong>tegration by parts,leads to(1 12kv b + ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ (z − z ′ ) ∂V so( ⃗ b, z ′ )(−ikz ′ ) η(∂b −∞∂b⃗ b, z ′ )= − i ∫ [z(dz ′ 2 + b ∂ ) ]V so (2v −∞ ∂b⃗ b, z) η( ⃗ b, z ′ ) , (2.86)for the Darw<strong>in</strong> term of Eq. (2.84). As a result, Eq. (2.83) takes the formη( ⃗ b, z) =1 − i ∫ [z(dz ′ V opt (v⃗ b, z ′ ) η( ⃗ b, z ′ ) − 1 1 + b ∂ ) ]V c (−∞2kv ∂b⃗ b, z) η( ⃗ b, z)+ z (1 + b ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ ∂V c( ⃗ b, z ′ )η(2kvb ∂b −∞ ∂b⃗ b, z ′ )+ 12kv V so( ⃗ b, z) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ k − ikz) η( ⃗ b, z)+ 1 (1 + b ∂ ) ∫ [zdz ′ (z − z ′ ∂() V so (2kvb ∂b −∞∂b⃗ b, z ′ ) ⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ k) ] η( ⃗ b, z ′ )− i ∫ [z(dz ′ 2 + b ∂ ) ]V so (2v −∞ ∂b⃗ b, z) η( ⃗ b, z ′ ) . (2.87)We look for a solution of the form(η( ⃗ b, z) = f( ⃗ b, z) exp − i ∫ z)d¯z V opt (v⃗ b, ¯z) f( ⃗ b, ¯z)−∞= f( ⃗ (b, z) exp i S( ⃗ )b, z) , (2.88)
Chapter 2. Relativistic Eikonal A(p, pN) Formalism 33which reduces to the ROMEA result of Eq. (2.50) when terms of higher order than V opt /k areneglected. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the function f( ⃗ b, z) should be of the form f = 1 + O(V opt /k 2 ). Substitut<strong>in</strong>g(2.88) <strong>in</strong>to Eq. (2.87) <strong>and</strong> multiply<strong>in</strong>g by e −i S(⃗b,z) on the right yields[ (f( ⃗ b, z) = 1 − 1 1 + b ∂ ) ]V c (2kv ∂b⃗ b, z) f( ⃗ b, z)+ z (1 + b ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ ∂V c( ⃗ b, z ′ )f(2kvb ∂b −∞ ∂b⃗ b, z ′ )+ 12kv V so( ⃗ b, z) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ k − ikz) f( ⃗ b, z)+ 1 (1 + b ∂ ) ∫ [zdz ′ (z − z ′ ∂() V so (2kvb ∂b −∞∂b⃗ b, z ′ ) ⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ k) ] f( ⃗ b, z ′ )− i ∫ [z(dz ′ 2 + b ∂ ) ]V so (2v −∞ ∂b⃗ b, z) f( ⃗ b, z ′ ) . (2.89)In deriv<strong>in</strong>g this equation, we set e i S(⃗ b,z ′) e −i S(⃗ b,z) equal to 1, s<strong>in</strong>ce higher-order terms are neglected.The difficulty <strong>in</strong> solv<strong>in</strong>g for f( ⃗ b, z) is that Eq. (2.89) is an <strong>in</strong>tegral equation. An expressionfor f( ⃗ b, z) can, however, be readily obta<strong>in</strong>ed by add<strong>in</strong>g (1−f) terms, which <strong>in</strong>troduce onlyhigher-order terms, to the right-h<strong>and</strong> side of Eq. (2.89). This is permitted s<strong>in</strong>ce the solution isonly determ<strong>in</strong>ed up to order V opt /k 2 . With this manipulation, the function f becomesf( ⃗ b, z) = 1 − 1 (1 + b ∂ )V c (2kv ∂b⃗ b, z) +z (1 + b ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ ∂V c( ⃗ b, z ′ )2kvb ∂b −∞ ∂b+ 12kv V so( ⃗ b, z) (⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ k − ikz)+ 1 (1 + b ∂ ) ∫ zdz ′ (z − z ′ ) ∂ (V so (2kvb ∂b −∞ ∂b⃗ b, z ′ ) ⃗σ ·⃗b × ⃗ )k− i ∫ z(dz ′ 2 + b ∂ )V so (2v∂b⃗ b, z) . (2.90)−∞The eikonal factor of Eq. (2.88) whereby f is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by (2.90) is a solution of the <strong>in</strong>tegralequation (2.83) to order V opt /k 2 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>deed reduces to the ROMEA result (2.50) when truncatedat order V opt /k. Furthermore, it can be easily verified that the derivative of η is of higher order<strong>in</strong> V opt /k than η itself. Henceforth, results obta<strong>in</strong>ed with the eikonal factor given by Eqs. (2.88)<strong>and</strong> (2.90) are dubbed as the second-order relativistic optical model eikonal approximation(SOROMEA).
- Page 1: FACULTEIT WETENSCHAPPENA RELATIVIST
- Page 8 and 9: Contentsiv
- Page 10 and 11: 2mechanism is obtained than in incl
- Page 12 and 13: 4rely on partial-wave expansions of
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2Relativistic Eikonal Descr
- Page 18 and 19: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 10w
- Page 20 and 21: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 12B
- Page 22 and 23: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 14M
- Page 24 and 25: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 16d
- Page 26 and 27: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 28 and 29: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 30 and 31: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 32 and 33: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 34 and 35: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 36 and 37: 2.4. Approximated RMSGA 2812121010
- Page 38 and 39: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 42 and 43: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 44 and 45: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 36sence of ini
- Page 46 and 47: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 38imaginary pa
- Page 48 and 49: 3.2. Radial and Polar-Angle Contrib
- Page 50 and 51: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 52 and 53: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 54 and 55: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 56 and 57: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 58 and 59: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 60 and 61: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 62 and 63: 54Figure 4.1 The beam-momentum depe
- Page 64 and 65: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 66 and 67: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 68 and 69: 4.3. Color Transparency 60of CT. Th
- Page 70 and 71: 4.3. Color Transparency 62with grou
- Page 72 and 73: 4.3. Color Transparency 64with p th
- Page 74 and 75: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 76 and 77: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 78 and 79: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 7
- Page 80 and 81: 4.5. Outlook 72the 7 Li and 12 C da
- Page 82 and 83: 4.5. Outlook 7410.812 C0.6Transpare
- Page 84 and 85: 4.5. Outlook 76
- Page 86 and 87: 5.1. The A(e, e ′ p) Matrix Eleme
- Page 88 and 89: 5.2. Nuclear Transparency 80112 C0.
- Page 90 and 91:
5.3. Induced Normal Polarization 82
- Page 92 and 93:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 84w
- Page 94 and 95:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 860
- Page 96 and 97:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 88d
- Page 98 and 99:
90framework, which is a multiple-sc
- Page 100 and 101:
92be transformed into an amplitude
- Page 102 and 103:
A.2. Pauli Matrices 94A.2 Pauli Mat
- Page 104 and 105:
96pseudo-scalar π mesons, as well
- Page 106 and 107:
980.11ρ chg(e/fm 3 )0.080.060.0440
- Page 108 and 109:
100with∫D r,θ (r, θ) ≡dφ sin
- Page 110 and 111:
Bibliography 102[12] R. A. Arndt, I
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography 104[43] E. D. Cooper,
- Page 114 and 115:
Bibliography 106[71] R. J. Glauber,
- Page 116 and 117:
Bibliography 108[104] S. J. Wallace
- Page 118 and 119:
Bibliography 110[132] C. Baglin et
- Page 120 and 121:
Bibliography 112[163] K. Wijesooriy
- Page 122 and 123:
Bibliography 114[195] L. L. Frankfu
- Page 124 and 125:
Bibliography 116[227] J. Botts, J.-
- Page 126 and 127:
Bibliography 118
- Page 128 and 129:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 120
- Page 130 and 131:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 122we
- Page 132:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 1246