2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatter<strong>in</strong>g Glauber Approximation 22Section 2.2, the notation refers to nucleon-nucleus potentials. Some algebraic manipulationslead to the follow<strong>in</strong>g form for the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude [70]〈∫〉F msm ′ (⃗ ks i , ⃗ k f , E) = m ′ iKs ∣ d2π⃗ b e i⃗ ∆·⃗b Γ NN (K, ⃗ b)∣ m s , (2.57)where the profile function is def<strong>in</strong>ed asΓ NN (K, ⃗ b) = 1 − e iχ(K,⃗ b) , (2.58)with the phase-shift function given byχ(K, ⃗ b) = − M NK∫ ∞−∞dz{V c ( ⃗ b, z) + V so ( ⃗ b, z) (⃗σ ·⃗b × K) ⃗ }. (2.59)The Darw<strong>in</strong> term V so ( ⃗ b, z ′ ) (−iKz) present <strong>in</strong> Eq. (2.50) does not contribute to the elastic scatter<strong>in</strong>gamplitude s<strong>in</strong>ce it is an odd function of z.In st<strong>and</strong>ard Glauber theory, knowledge about the NN <strong>in</strong>teraction potentials V c (r) <strong>and</strong>V so (r) is not needed, s<strong>in</strong>ce the phase-shift function χ(K, ⃗ b) can be directly extracted from protonproton<strong>and</strong> proton-neutron scatter<strong>in</strong>g data on the basis of Eq. (2.57). This procedure will beoutl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> what follows.Assum<strong>in</strong>g parity conservation, time-reversal <strong>in</strong>variance, the Pauli pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, <strong>and</strong> isosp<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>variance, the most general form for the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude <strong>in</strong> the NN c.m. frame can bewritten <strong>in</strong> terms of five <strong>in</strong>variant amplitudes [68, 89]F ( ⃗ ∆) = A( ⃗ ∆) + B( ⃗ ∆) (⃗σ 1 + ⃗σ 2 ) · ˆn + C( ⃗ ∆) (⃗σ 1 · ˆn) (⃗σ 2 · ˆn)+ D( ⃗ ∆) (⃗σ 1 · ˆm) (⃗σ 2 · ˆm) + E( ⃗ ∆) (⃗σ 1 · ˆl) (⃗σ 2 · ˆl) . (2.60)The <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al nucleon sp<strong>in</strong> operators are denoted by ⃗σ 1 <strong>and</strong> ⃗σ 2 , <strong>and</strong> ˆn ≡ ⃗ k i × ⃗ k f| ⃗ k i × ⃗ , ˆm ≡k f |⃗ ki − ⃗ k f| ⃗ k i − ⃗ , <strong>and</strong> ˆl ≡ ⃗ k i + ⃗ k fk f | | ⃗ k i + ⃗ . Here, ⃗ k i is the <strong>in</strong>itial, ⃗ kk f | f the f<strong>in</strong>al, <strong>and</strong> ∆ ⃗ the transferred momentum.As such, the NN scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude consists of a central term, a sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit term, <strong>and</strong> threeother sp<strong>in</strong>-dependent terms. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, the amplitudes A, B, C, D, <strong>and</strong> E can be determ<strong>in</strong>edthrough a complete phase-shift analysis of the NN scatter<strong>in</strong>g data. In practice, most analysesonly <strong>in</strong>clude the central term of the NN amplitude, s<strong>in</strong>ce the small-angle scatter<strong>in</strong>g of protonswith momentum k > 1 GeV/c is assumed to be dom<strong>in</strong>ated by this sp<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>dependent term.The sp<strong>in</strong>less version of Glauber theory was very successful <strong>in</strong> the analysis of proton-nucleuscross-section data [62, 68, 90]. The surpris<strong>in</strong>g behavior of sp<strong>in</strong> observables <strong>in</strong> NN scatter<strong>in</strong>g[91, 92], however, poses a real challenge. As of today, a quantitative underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the sp<strong>in</strong>dependence of the NN <strong>in</strong>teraction above 1 GeV does not exist [93]. In this work, all results areobta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> the framework of sp<strong>in</strong>less Glauber theory.The central term of Eq. (2.60) is parametrized asA( ⃗ ∆) ≡ A( ⃗ ∆ = 0) exp(− β2 NN ∆22). (2.61)
Chapter 2. Relativistic Eikonal A(p, pN) Formalism 23with βNN 2 the slope parameter. This Gaussian parametrization is based on the diffractive pattern,with broad maxima <strong>and</strong> diffractive dips, observed <strong>in</strong> elastic NN collisions at GeV energies.Similar to Fraunhofer diffraction <strong>in</strong> optics, the diffraction phenomenon occurs when thewavelength of the projectile is short compared to the size of the <strong>in</strong>teraction region. The differentialcross section dσ/dt, with t ≡ (k µ f − kµ i )2 the M<strong>and</strong>elstam variable, is extremely forwardpeaked <strong>and</strong> drops exponentially over many orders. The slope parameter βNN 2 describes the tdependence of the elastic NN differential cross section at forward angles:dσ elNNdt≈ dσel NNdt∣ exp ( −βNN 2 |t| ) . (2.62)t=0Us<strong>in</strong>g the optical theorem Im F (θ = 0, φ = 0) = k σtot4π, one f<strong>in</strong>dsA( ∆) ⃗ = k )σtot NN4π(ɛ NN + i) exp(− β2 NN ∆2, (2.63)2with ɛ NN the ratio of the real to the imag<strong>in</strong>ary part of the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude.The <strong>in</strong>verse Fourier transform of Eq. (2.57) br<strong>in</strong>gs about the follow<strong>in</strong>g expression for theprofile function:Γ NN(k, ⃗ )b = σtot NN (k) (1 − iɛ NN (k))4πβNN 2 (k)( )⃗ b2exp −2βNN 2 (k) . (2.64)The profile function for central elastic NN scatter<strong>in</strong>g depends on the momentum k throughthree parameters: the total NN cross sections σNN tot (k), the slope parameters β2 NN(k), <strong>and</strong> theratios of the real to the imag<strong>in</strong>ary part of the scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude ɛ NN (k). These parameterscan be determ<strong>in</strong>ed directly from the elementary proton-proton <strong>and</strong> proton-neutron scatter<strong>in</strong>gdata, <strong>and</strong> will be discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 2.3.4.At lower energies, that part of the profile function proportional to ɛ NN (k) is non-Gaussian<strong>and</strong> makes significant contributions to nuclear scatter<strong>in</strong>g. Rather than Eq. (2.64), a parametrization<strong>in</strong> terms of the Arndt NN phases [12,13] is appropriate at lower energies. For the Glaubercalculations presented here, which address higher energies, the Gaussian-like real part ofΓ NN(k, ⃗ )b is the dom<strong>in</strong>ant contributor, <strong>and</strong> the use of Eq. (2.64) is justified.2.3.2 Glauber Multiple-Scatter<strong>in</strong>g Extension of the EAAssum<strong>in</strong>g that the sequential scatter<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong>dependent, the eikonal method can easily beextended to multiple scatter<strong>in</strong>g. This constitutes the basis of Glauber theory [62–64]. The scatter<strong>in</strong>goff a composite system (the IFSI <strong>in</strong> A(p, pN) reactions) is modeled as the scatter<strong>in</strong>g ofa fast particle (the <strong>in</strong>cident, scattered, or ejected nucleon) with the scatter<strong>in</strong>g centers of thecomposite system (the spectator nucleons <strong>in</strong> the residual nucleus). We assume that the fastparticle’s momentum is much larger than that of the spectator nucleons. Then, the particle undergoesa negligible deflection <strong>and</strong> its trajectory can be approximated by a straight l<strong>in</strong>e (thisis the EA). In addition, because the time it takes the particle to traverse the nucleus is very
- Page 1: FACULTEIT WETENSCHAPPENA RELATIVIST
- Page 8 and 9: Contentsiv
- Page 10 and 11: 2mechanism is obtained than in incl
- Page 12 and 13: 4rely on partial-wave expansions of
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2Relativistic Eikonal Descr
- Page 18 and 19: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 10w
- Page 20 and 21: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 12B
- Page 22 and 23: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 14M
- Page 24 and 25: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 16d
- Page 26 and 27: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 28 and 29: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 32 and 33: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 34 and 35: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 36 and 37: 2.4. Approximated RMSGA 2812121010
- Page 38 and 39: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 40 and 41: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 42 and 43: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 44 and 45: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 36sence of ini
- Page 46 and 47: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 38imaginary pa
- Page 48 and 49: 3.2. Radial and Polar-Angle Contrib
- Page 50 and 51: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 52 and 53: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 54 and 55: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 56 and 57: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 58 and 59: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 60 and 61: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 62 and 63: 54Figure 4.1 The beam-momentum depe
- Page 64 and 65: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 66 and 67: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 68 and 69: 4.3. Color Transparency 60of CT. Th
- Page 70 and 71: 4.3. Color Transparency 62with grou
- Page 72 and 73: 4.3. Color Transparency 64with p th
- Page 74 and 75: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 76 and 77: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 78 and 79: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 7
- Page 80 and 81:
4.5. Outlook 72the 7 Li and 12 C da
- Page 82 and 83:
4.5. Outlook 7410.812 C0.6Transpare
- Page 84 and 85:
4.5. Outlook 76
- Page 86 and 87:
5.1. The A(e, e ′ p) Matrix Eleme
- Page 88 and 89:
5.2. Nuclear Transparency 80112 C0.
- Page 90 and 91:
5.3. Induced Normal Polarization 82
- Page 92 and 93:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 84w
- Page 94 and 95:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 860
- Page 96 and 97:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 88d
- Page 98 and 99:
90framework, which is a multiple-sc
- Page 100 and 101:
92be transformed into an amplitude
- Page 102 and 103:
A.2. Pauli Matrices 94A.2 Pauli Mat
- Page 104 and 105:
96pseudo-scalar π mesons, as well
- Page 106 and 107:
980.11ρ chg(e/fm 3 )0.080.060.0440
- Page 108 and 109:
100with∫D r,θ (r, θ) ≡dφ sin
- Page 110 and 111:
Bibliography 102[12] R. A. Arndt, I
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography 104[43] E. D. Cooper,
- Page 114 and 115:
Bibliography 106[71] R. J. Glauber,
- Page 116 and 117:
Bibliography 108[104] S. J. Wallace
- Page 118 and 119:
Bibliography 110[132] C. Baglin et
- Page 120 and 121:
Bibliography 112[163] K. Wijesooriy
- Page 122 and 123:
Bibliography 114[195] L. L. Frankfu
- Page 124 and 125:
Bibliography 116[227] J. Botts, J.-
- Page 126 and 127:
Bibliography 118
- Page 128 and 129:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 120
- Page 130 and 131:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 122we
- Page 132:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 1246