2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatter<strong>in</strong>g Glauber Approximation 24small, the spectator nucleons can be approximated by fixed scatter<strong>in</strong>g centers (the so-calledfrozen approximation). As mentioned before, we adopt a sp<strong>in</strong>less Glauber theory, i.e., the fastparticle only <strong>in</strong>teracts with the scatterers by means of two-body sp<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>in</strong>teractions.Exchange effects between the fast particle <strong>and</strong> the spectator nucleons are neglected as well.For a multiple-scatter<strong>in</strong>g event lead<strong>in</strong>g from an <strong>in</strong>itial state |i〉 to a f<strong>in</strong>al state |f〉, the Glauberscatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude readsF multi ( ∆) ⃗ = iK ∫2πwhere the total Glauber phase-shift functionχ tot (K, ⃗ b, ⃗ b 2 , . . . , ⃗ b A ) =d ⃗ b e i⃗ ∆·⃗b 〈f| 1 − e iχtot(K,⃗ b, ⃗ b 2 ,..., ⃗ b A ) |i〉 , (2.65)A∑χ j (K, ⃗ b − ⃗ b j ) , (2.66)j=2is the sum of the phase shifts χ j contributed by each of the spectator scatterers. Here, ⃗ b denotesthe impact parameter of the fast nucleon <strong>and</strong> ( ⃗ b 2 , ⃗ b 3 , . . . , ⃗ b A ) those of the frozen spectator nucleons.The phase-shift additivity property of Eq. (2.66) is a direct result of the follow<strong>in</strong>g assumptions:the one-dimensional nature of the relative motion <strong>and</strong> the neglect of three- <strong>and</strong> morebodyforces, scatterer motion, <strong>and</strong> longitud<strong>in</strong>al momentum transfer. Moreover, as Eq. (2.65) isbased on the eikonal approximation, it is only valid when the energy transfer is small comparedto the <strong>in</strong>cident particle energy, i.e., for elastic <strong>and</strong> mildly <strong>in</strong>elastic collisions. Expression (2.65)does not apply to deeply <strong>in</strong>elastic collisions <strong>in</strong> which the nature of the particles is modified orthe number of particles is altered dur<strong>in</strong>g the collision.Under the assumption of phase-shift additivity, the eikonal wave function of Eq. (2.51) canbe generalized to many-body scatter<strong>in</strong>g. The scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function for a fast nucleon withmomentum k <strong>and</strong> sp<strong>in</strong> state ∣ 12 m s〉which scatters from A − 1 residual nucleons reads√ []Ψ (+) E + MN 1⃗(⃗r) =k,ms 2M N1E+M N⃗σ · ˆ⃗pŜ e i⃗k·⃗r χ 1 , (2.67)ms2where the operator Ŝ implements the subsequent collisions of the fast nucleon with the frozenspectator nucleonsŜ (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , ⃗r 3 , . . . , ⃗r A ) ≡A∏j=2e −i M NKR z−∞ dz ′ V c( ⃗ b− ⃗ b j ,z ′ −z j ) . (2.68)As <strong>in</strong> the ROMEA framework, only the central sp<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>dependent contribution V c ( ⃗ b, z) is reta<strong>in</strong>ed,the impulse operator is replaced by the nucleon momentum, <strong>and</strong> the dynamical enhancementof the lower component has been neglected s<strong>in</strong>ce E + M N ≫ |V s (r) − V v (r)| for thehigh energies at which Glauber theory is applied. In this general form, the multiple-scatter<strong>in</strong>gwave function can not be directly related to the <strong>in</strong>dividual profile function for NN scatter<strong>in</strong>g(2.64).
Chapter 2. Relativistic Eikonal A(p, pN) Formalism 25The zero-range approximation along the scatter<strong>in</strong>g direction offers the possibility to expressthe multiple-scatter<strong>in</strong>g wave function <strong>in</strong> terms of the experimentally determ<strong>in</strong>ed profilefunction, thereby avoid<strong>in</strong>g the technical complications with respect to potential scatter<strong>in</strong>g. Thezero-range approximationV c ( ⃗ b − ⃗ b j , z ′ − z j ) ≃ V ⊥c ( ⃗ b − ⃗ b j ) δ(z ′ − z j ) , (2.69)amounts to neglect<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>ite longitud<strong>in</strong>al dimension of the NN <strong>in</strong>teraction region. Afterexp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g expression (2.68) for Ŝ <strong>and</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g the zero-range approximation, one obta<strong>in</strong>sŜ ≃A∏j=2(1 − i M )NK V c ⊥ ( ⃗ b − ⃗ b j ) θ(z ′ − z j ). (2.70)Us<strong>in</strong>g the relation (2.58) between the profile function <strong>and</strong> the phase-shift function, a similarreason<strong>in</strong>g leads toΓ NN (K, ⃗ b) ≃ i M NK V ⊥c ( ⃗ b) . (2.71)F<strong>in</strong>ally, the Glauber operator becomesŜ (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , ⃗r 3 , . . . , ⃗r A ) ≡A∏ [1 − Γ NN(K, ⃗ b − ⃗ )b jj=2]θ (z − z j ), (2.72)where the step function θ (z − z j ) ensures that the nucleon only <strong>in</strong>teracts with other nucleonsif they are localized <strong>in</strong> its forward propagation path.2.3.3 RMSGA for A(p, pN) ReactionsThe Glauber operators <strong>in</strong> Eq. (2.36) take the formsŜ p1 (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , ⃗r 3 , . . . , ⃗r A ) =Ŝ k1 (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , ⃗r 3 , . . . , ⃗r A ) =Ŝ k2 (⃗r, ⃗r 2 , ⃗r 3 , . . . , ⃗r A ) =A∏ [1 − Γ pN(p 1 , ⃗ b − ⃗ )b jj=2A∏j=2A∏j=2]θ (z − z j )( [1 − Γ pN k 1 , ⃗ b ′ − ⃗ )b ′ j θ ( z ′ j − z ′)] ,[ (1 − Γ Nk2 N k 2 , ⃗ b ′′ − ⃗ )b ′′j, (2.73a)θ ( z ′′j − z ′′)] ,(2.73b)(2.73c)where N k2 = p (n) for A(p, 2p) (A(p, pn)) reactions. Further, ⃗r denotes the collision po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>and</strong> (⃗r 2 , ⃗r 3 , . . . , ⃗r A ) are the positions of the frozen spectator protons <strong>and</strong> neutrons <strong>in</strong> the target.The ( ⃗ b, z), ( ⃗ b ′ , z ′ ), <strong>and</strong> ( ⃗ b ′′ , z ′′ ) coord<strong>in</strong>ate systems are def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2.2. The stepfunctions guarantee that the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g proton can only <strong>in</strong>teract with those spectator nucleonsit encounters before the hard collision <strong>and</strong> that the outgo<strong>in</strong>g protons can only <strong>in</strong>teract with thespectator nucleons they f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> their forward propagation paths.
- Page 1: FACULTEIT WETENSCHAPPENA RELATIVIST
- Page 8 and 9: Contentsiv
- Page 10 and 11: 2mechanism is obtained than in incl
- Page 12 and 13: 4rely on partial-wave expansions of
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2Relativistic Eikonal Descr
- Page 18 and 19: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 10w
- Page 20 and 21: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 12B
- Page 22 and 23: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 14M
- Page 24 and 25: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 16d
- Page 26 and 27: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 28 and 29: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 30 and 31: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 34 and 35: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 36 and 37: 2.4. Approximated RMSGA 2812121010
- Page 38 and 39: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 40 and 41: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 42 and 43: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 44 and 45: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 36sence of ini
- Page 46 and 47: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 38imaginary pa
- Page 48 and 49: 3.2. Radial and Polar-Angle Contrib
- Page 50 and 51: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 52 and 53: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 54 and 55: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 56 and 57: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 58 and 59: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 60 and 61: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 62 and 63: 54Figure 4.1 The beam-momentum depe
- Page 64 and 65: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 66 and 67: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 68 and 69: 4.3. Color Transparency 60of CT. Th
- Page 70 and 71: 4.3. Color Transparency 62with grou
- Page 72 and 73: 4.3. Color Transparency 64with p th
- Page 74 and 75: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 76 and 77: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 78 and 79: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 7
- Page 80 and 81: 4.5. Outlook 72the 7 Li and 12 C da
- Page 82 and 83:
4.5. Outlook 7410.812 C0.6Transpare
- Page 84 and 85:
4.5. Outlook 76
- Page 86 and 87:
5.1. The A(e, e ′ p) Matrix Eleme
- Page 88 and 89:
5.2. Nuclear Transparency 80112 C0.
- Page 90 and 91:
5.3. Induced Normal Polarization 82
- Page 92 and 93:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 84w
- Page 94 and 95:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 860
- Page 96 and 97:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 88d
- Page 98 and 99:
90framework, which is a multiple-sc
- Page 100 and 101:
92be transformed into an amplitude
- Page 102 and 103:
A.2. Pauli Matrices 94A.2 Pauli Mat
- Page 104 and 105:
96pseudo-scalar π mesons, as well
- Page 106 and 107:
980.11ρ chg(e/fm 3 )0.080.060.0440
- Page 108 and 109:
100with∫D r,θ (r, θ) ≡dφ sin
- Page 110 and 111:
Bibliography 102[12] R. A. Arndt, I
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography 104[43] E. D. Cooper,
- Page 114 and 115:
Bibliography 106[71] R. J. Glauber,
- Page 116 and 117:
Bibliography 108[104] S. J. Wallace
- Page 118 and 119:
Bibliography 110[132] C. Baglin et
- Page 120 and 121:
Bibliography 112[163] K. Wijesooriy
- Page 122 and 123:
Bibliography 114[195] L. L. Frankfu
- Page 124 and 125:
Bibliography 116[227] J. Botts, J.-
- Page 126 and 127:
Bibliography 118
- Page 128 and 129:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 120
- Page 130 and 131:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 122we
- Page 132:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 1246