3.1. The IFSI Factor 36sence of <strong>in</strong>itial- <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al-state <strong>in</strong>teractions the real part of the IFSI factor equals one, whereasthe imag<strong>in</strong>ary part vanishes identically.The A(p, pN) IFSI factor is a function of three <strong>in</strong>dependent variables (r, θ, φ). The z axis ischosen along the direction of the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g beam ⃗p 1 , the y axis lies along ⃗p 1 × ⃗ k 1 , <strong>and</strong> the xaxis lies <strong>in</strong> the scatter<strong>in</strong>g plane def<strong>in</strong>ed by the proton momenta ⃗p 1 <strong>and</strong> ⃗ k 1 . θ <strong>and</strong> φ denote thepolar <strong>and</strong> azimuthal angles with respect to the z axis <strong>and</strong> the x axis, respectively. The radialcoord<strong>in</strong>ate r represents the distance relative to the center of the target nucleus.3.1.1 Polar-Angle DependenceTo ga<strong>in</strong> a better <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the dependence of the IFSI factor on r, θ, <strong>and</strong> φ, we calculated thecontribution of the three distort<strong>in</strong>g functions Ŝp1, Ŝ k1 , <strong>and</strong> Ŝk2 to the IFSI factor. In Figs. 3.1<strong>and</strong> 3.2 results are displayed for the computed real <strong>and</strong> imag<strong>in</strong>ary part of S IFSI (r, θ, φ = 0) forproton emission from the Fermi level <strong>in</strong> 12 C. The results were computed with<strong>in</strong> the ROMEAframework, us<strong>in</strong>g the EDAD1 optical-potential parametrization of [46].The θ dependence can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as follows. For a given r, the distance that the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>gproton travels through the target nucleus before collid<strong>in</strong>g hard with a target nucleondecreases with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g angle θ. As a consequence, small values of θ <strong>in</strong>duce the largest ISI.For the FSI of the scattered proton, the opposite holds true, <strong>and</strong> θ = 180 ◦ for a large r valuecorresponds to an event whereby the hard collision transpires at the outskirts of the nucleus<strong>and</strong> the scattered proton has to travel through the whole nucleus before it becomes asymptoticallyfree, thus giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to the smallest (largest) values for the real (imag<strong>in</strong>ary) part of theIFSI factor. Unlike the scattered proton, which moves almost coll<strong>in</strong>ear to the z axis, the ejectednucleon leaves the nucleus under a large scatter<strong>in</strong>g angle θ 2 . Hence, the FSI are m<strong>in</strong>imal forθ close to 0 ◦ or 180 ◦ <strong>and</strong> maximal for θ around 180 ◦ − θ 2 . F<strong>in</strong>ally, the θ dependence of thecomplete IFSI factor is the result of the <strong>in</strong>terplay between the three distort<strong>in</strong>g effects, with thestrongest scatter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> absorption observed at θ close to 0 ◦ , 180 ◦ − θ 2 , <strong>and</strong> 180 ◦ .3.1.2 Radial DependenceFig. 3.3 displays the real part of the 40 Ca IFSI factor as a function of r at various values of θ.The ROMEA calculations were performed for the same k<strong>in</strong>ematics as <strong>in</strong> Figs. 3.1 <strong>and</strong> 3.2, <strong>and</strong>employed the EDAI optical-potential fit of [46].The upper left panel suggest that the ISI effects <strong>in</strong>crease with grow<strong>in</strong>g r for θ = 0 ◦ . Forθ = 45 ◦ <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g r, <strong>in</strong>itially, the grow<strong>in</strong>g distance the proton has to travel through thenucleus leads to a decrease of the real part of Ŝp1. This is followed by an <strong>in</strong>crease for larger rup to Ŝp1 = 1. This reduction <strong>in</strong> ISI effects with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g r is brought about by the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>gproton’s path through the nucleus mov<strong>in</strong>g away from the nuclear <strong>in</strong>terior <strong>and</strong> closer to theless dense nuclear surface. The other curves of the upper left figure reveal a general trend for90 ◦ ≤ θ ≤ 180 ◦ : as r <strong>in</strong>creases, the real part of the IFSI factor grows correspond<strong>in</strong>gly. As canbe appreciated from Fig. 3.3 as well as from the previous figures, the global behavior of the Ŝk1
Chapter 3. IFSI <strong>and</strong> A(p, pN) Differential Cross Sections 37real part of S IFSI10.80.60.40.2real part of S IFSI10.80.60.40.2150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6real part of S IFSI0.80.60.4real part of S IFSI0.80.60.40.2150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6Figure 3.1 The radial <strong>and</strong> polar-angle dependence of the real part of the IFSI factor S IFSI <strong>in</strong> the scatter<strong>in</strong>gplane (φ = 0 ◦ ) for proton knockout from the Fermi level <strong>in</strong> 12 C. The upper left panel is the contributionfrom the imp<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g proton (Ŝp1), while the upper right panel shows the effect of the FSI of the scatteredproton (Ŝk1). In the bottom left figure, the effect of the FSI of the ejected proton (Ŝk2) is presented <strong>and</strong>the bottom right figure shows the complete IFSI factor (Ŝk1 Ŝk2 Ŝp1). The k<strong>in</strong>ematics was T p1 = 1 GeV,T k1 = 870 MeV, θ 1 = 13.4 ◦ , <strong>and</strong> θ 2 = 67 ◦ .factor describ<strong>in</strong>g the scattered proton’s FSI can be related to that of the ISI factor Ŝp1 through thesubstitution θ → 180 ◦ − θ. This approximate symmetry can be attributed to the small scatter<strong>in</strong>gangle θ 1 , i.e., the scattered proton leaves the nucleus almost parallel to the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g proton’sdirection. In the bottom left panel, the additional curve (θ = 115 ◦ , i.e., close to 180 ◦ − θ 2 )represents the situation of maximal FSI of the ejected nucleon. For this θ value, the path of theejected nucleon passes through the center of the nucleus, <strong>and</strong> the distance traveled throughthe nucleus <strong>in</strong>creases with r. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the real part of Ŝk2 is a monotonously decreas<strong>in</strong>gfunction of r. The other extreme is the θ = 0 ◦ case, where <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g r means less FSI. For theother θ values, the absorption reaches its maximum for some <strong>in</strong>termediate r value. Aga<strong>in</strong>, thecomb<strong>in</strong>ation of Ŝp1, Ŝk1, <strong>and</strong> Ŝk2 determ<strong>in</strong>es the total IFSI factor, with the strongest attenuationpredicted <strong>in</strong> the nuclear <strong>in</strong>terior.
- Page 1: FACULTEIT WETENSCHAPPENA RELATIVIST
- Page 8 and 9: Contentsiv
- Page 10 and 11: 2mechanism is obtained than in incl
- Page 12 and 13: 4rely on partial-wave expansions of
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 2Relativistic Eikonal Descr
- Page 18 and 19: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 10w
- Page 20 and 21: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 12B
- Page 22 and 23: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 14M
- Page 24 and 25: 2.1. Observables and Kinematics 16d
- Page 26 and 27: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 28 and 29: 2.2. Relativistic Optical Model Eik
- Page 30 and 31: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 32 and 33: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 34 and 35: 2.3. Relativistic Multiple-Scatteri
- Page 36 and 37: 2.4. Approximated RMSGA 2812121010
- Page 38 and 39: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 40 and 41: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 42 and 43: 2.5. Second-Order Eikonal Correctio
- Page 46 and 47: 3.1. The IFSI Factor 38imaginary pa
- Page 48 and 49: 3.2. Radial and Polar-Angle Contrib
- Page 50 and 51: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 52 and 53: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 54 and 55: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 56 and 57: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 58 and 59: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 60 and 61: 3.3. A(p, pN) Differential Cross Se
- Page 62 and 63: 54Figure 4.1 The beam-momentum depe
- Page 64 and 65: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 66 and 67: 4.1. High-Momentum-Transfer Wide-An
- Page 68 and 69: 4.3. Color Transparency 60of CT. Th
- Page 70 and 71: 4.3. Color Transparency 62with grou
- Page 72 and 73: 4.3. Color Transparency 64with p th
- Page 74 and 75: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 76 and 77: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 6
- Page 78 and 79: 4.4. Nuclear Transparency Results 7
- Page 80 and 81: 4.5. Outlook 72the 7 Li and 12 C da
- Page 82 and 83: 4.5. Outlook 7410.812 C0.6Transpare
- Page 84 and 85: 4.5. Outlook 76
- Page 86 and 87: 5.1. The A(e, e ′ p) Matrix Eleme
- Page 88 and 89: 5.2. Nuclear Transparency 80112 C0.
- Page 90 and 91: 5.3. Induced Normal Polarization 82
- Page 92 and 93: 5.5. Differential Cross Section 84w
- Page 94 and 95:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 860
- Page 96 and 97:
5.5. Differential Cross Section 88d
- Page 98 and 99:
90framework, which is a multiple-sc
- Page 100 and 101:
92be transformed into an amplitude
- Page 102 and 103:
A.2. Pauli Matrices 94A.2 Pauli Mat
- Page 104 and 105:
96pseudo-scalar π mesons, as well
- Page 106 and 107:
980.11ρ chg(e/fm 3 )0.080.060.0440
- Page 108 and 109:
100with∫D r,θ (r, θ) ≡dφ sin
- Page 110 and 111:
Bibliography 102[12] R. A. Arndt, I
- Page 112 and 113:
Bibliography 104[43] E. D. Cooper,
- Page 114 and 115:
Bibliography 106[71] R. J. Glauber,
- Page 116 and 117:
Bibliography 108[104] S. J. Wallace
- Page 118 and 119:
Bibliography 110[132] C. Baglin et
- Page 120 and 121:
Bibliography 112[163] K. Wijesooriy
- Page 122 and 123:
Bibliography 114[195] L. L. Frankfu
- Page 124 and 125:
Bibliography 116[227] J. Botts, J.-
- Page 126 and 127:
Bibliography 118
- Page 128 and 129:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 120
- Page 130 and 131:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 122we
- Page 132:
Nederlandstalige samenvatting 1246