12.07.2015 Views

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. IFSI <strong>and</strong> A(p, pN) Differential Cross Sections 43real part of S IFSI0.80.60.40.2real part of S IFSI0.80.60.40.2150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6real part of S IFSI0.80.60.40.20real part of S IFSI0.80.60.40.20150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6150θ (deg)10050012345r (fm)6Figure 3.7 As <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.1, but us<strong>in</strong>g the RMSGA method.Furthermore, comparison of the RPWIA <strong>and</strong> ROMEA calculations shows that the effect of theIFSI is twofold. First, IFSI result <strong>in</strong> a reduction of the RPWIA cross section that is both level <strong>and</strong>A dependent. From the figures it is clear that ejection of a nucleon from a deeper ly<strong>in</strong>g levelleads to stronger <strong>in</strong>itial- <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al-state distortions. This reflects the fact that the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>outgo<strong>in</strong>g nucleons encounter more obstacles when a deeper ly<strong>in</strong>g bound nucleon is probed.The A dependence also conforms with our expectations, i.e., the IFSI effects are larger for heaviernuclei. Besides the attenuation, the IFSI also make the measured miss<strong>in</strong>g momentum differentfrom the <strong>in</strong>itial momentum of the struck nucleon. As can be <strong>in</strong>ferred from Fig. 3.13, thismomentum shift leads to an asymmetry between the positive <strong>and</strong> negative miss<strong>in</strong>g-momentumside of the momentum distribution. Note that a positive miss<strong>in</strong>g momentum corresponds top mx = k 1 s<strong>in</strong> θ 1 + k 2 s<strong>in</strong> θ 2 cos φ 2 > 0.3.3.2 40 Ca(p, 2p) at 460 MeVNext, we focus on a 40 Ca(p, 2p) experiment conducted at the EFI facility <strong>in</strong> Chicago by Tyrén etal. [115]. The imp<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g proton had a k<strong>in</strong>etic energy of T p1 = 460 MeV, while the outgo<strong>in</strong>g pro-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!