12.07.2015 Views

Conference Program - ABRF 2011 - Association of Biomolecular ...

Conference Program - ABRF 2011 - Association of Biomolecular ...

Conference Program - ABRF 2011 - Association of Biomolecular ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are the best methods for optimal recovery and proteome coverage.A novel approach for fractionating samples at the level <strong>of</strong> proteincomplexes will also be discussed.(S6-2) Improving the Comprehensiveness <strong>of</strong> Large-Scale Proteomics Experiments Using AdvancedComputational Tools and Accurate MultipleHypothesis Testing StatisticsM.J. MacCoss, J. Egertson, B. Frewen, L. Käll, W. NobleDepartment <strong>of</strong> Genome Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Washington,Seattle, WA, United StatesMass spectrometry based technology for the analysis <strong>of</strong> complexprotein mixtures has improved at an amazing rate. With each newinstrument release, mass spectrometers have become more sensitiveand have faster MS/MS data acquisition speeds. Furthermore,instruments are continuously improving the dynamic range, massaccuracy, and resolution <strong>of</strong> the resulting mass spectrometry data. All<strong>of</strong> these developments have increased the number <strong>of</strong> peptides thatcan be identified and quantified without extending the overall analysistime. While the technological hardware advances that are required toincrease the number <strong>of</strong> peptide identifications by 50% with a constantanalysis time is monumental, we have been able to demonstrate thatincrease in performance without increasing the analysis time at all. Toaccomplish this, we have made use <strong>of</strong> improved database searchingalgorithms, spectrum library searching, use <strong>of</strong> chromatographicretention time, powerful machine learning tools, accurate multiplehypothesis testing statistics, and many more. Strategies will bediscussed on how to increase the comprehensiveness <strong>of</strong> any datasetusing improved data analysis strategies.(S6-3) In-Depth Analysis <strong>of</strong> Human and MousePlasma Using 3-D And 4-D Fractionation StrategiesD.W. SpeicherThe Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesIn-depth pr<strong>of</strong>iling <strong>of</strong> plasma proteomes can potentially identify noveldisease biomarkers. But few biomarkers identified by proteomicapproaches have advanced to early-stage clinical testing because they<strong>of</strong>ten are not sufficiently disease specific. Major challenges in plasmaproteome analysis include the very wide dynamic range <strong>of</strong> proteinconcentrations, the high protein complexity, and the substantialheterogeneity <strong>of</strong> most protein concentrations in the normal humanpopulation. Because most disease-specific biomarkers are present inblood at very low concentrations, extensive fractionation is requiredprior to LC-MS/MS analysis. In general, more fractionation will result ingreater depth <strong>of</strong> analysis, but there is a point <strong>of</strong> diminishing return foreach fractionation method and throughput decreases as the number<strong>of</strong> LC-MS/MS runs per proteome increases. A common feature <strong>of</strong> mostcurrent plasma pr<strong>of</strong>iling methods is to first immunodeplete as manyhigh abundance plasma proteins as possible, followed by extensiveprotein fractionation <strong>of</strong> the depleted plasma prior to trypsin digestionand LC-MS/MS. In addition, reliable quantitative comparisons areneeded for most types <strong>of</strong> studies. While all quantitative methods havestrengths and weaknesses, label-free quantitative comparison <strong>of</strong> LC-MSsignals is increasing in popularity and seems adequately reproduciblefor most studies. Our laboratory commonly uses two alternative plasmaproteome analysis strategies. One powerful approach utilizes a 3-Dprotein/peptide pr<strong>of</strong>iling method consisting <strong>of</strong> depleting 20 abundantproteins followed by 1-D SDS PAGE, fractionation <strong>of</strong> the gel lane into20 to 60 fractions and LC-MS/MS analysis. Proteins can be quantitativelycompared using label-free analysis <strong>of</strong> ion current patterns from the MSfull scans. An even greater depth <strong>of</strong> analysis can be achieved using a4-D protein/peptide pr<strong>of</strong>iling strategy utilizing microscale solutionisoelectr<strong>of</strong>ocusing <strong>of</strong> proteins prior the SDS gel in the 3-D scheme,although throughput is substantially reduced.(S7) Next Generation Sequencing Technologieson the Horizon(S7-1) Towards Optical DNA Sequencing UsingNanopore ArraysA. MellerDepartment <strong>of</strong> Biomedical Engineering, Boston University,Boston, MA, United StatesNext generation DNA sequencing methods that utilize nanometersizepores have been subject <strong>of</strong> numerous studies in past years. One<strong>of</strong> the compelling features <strong>of</strong> the nanopore technique lies in its abilityto electrophoretically focus long DNA strands towards the pore areaand thread the molecules inside the pore in a highly efficient manner.Thus extremely small copy numbers <strong>of</strong> the target DNA are requiredfor analyses†, circumventing the need for costly and time-consumingtarget amplification. One <strong>of</strong> the major bottlenecks for the realization<strong>of</strong> a viable nanopore-based DNA sequencing has been the ability tosimultaneously read the electrical signals from hundreds to thousands<strong>of</strong> nanopores densely fabricated on sub-millimeter size silicon chip. Toaddress this issue we develop an extremely high throughput singlemoleculeDNA sequencing technique, which employs optical, widefieldreadout from DNA molecules electrically mobilized throughthe nanopores. Our method consists <strong>of</strong> two steps: First, target DNAmolecules are converted according to pre-determined code, which isrecognized by molecular beacons with four types <strong>of</strong> fluorophores (eachuniquely corresponding to one <strong>of</strong> the four DNA bases). Solid-statenanopores are then used to sequentially strip <strong>of</strong>f the beacons, leadingto a series <strong>of</strong> photon bursts that can be detected with a custom mademicroscope. Notably the method circumvents the use <strong>of</strong> enzymes in thereadout stage, and is thus not affected by their limited processivity andlifetime. Here we demonstrate the feasibility <strong>of</strong> this method using a twocolor model system, and show for the first time, individual nucleotiderecognition from multiple nanopores simultaneously‡, allowingstraightforward parallelization <strong>of</strong> our system to nanopore arrays. †.Wanunu, M., W. Morrison, Y. Rabin, A. Y. Grosberg, and A. Meller. 2010.Electrostatic Focusing <strong>of</strong> Unlabeled DNA into Nanoscale Pores using aSalt Gradient. Nature Nanotechnology 5:160-165. ‡. McNally, B., A.Singer, Z. Yu, Y. Sun, Z. Weng, and A. Meller. 2010. Optical Recognition<strong>of</strong> Converted DNA Nucleotides for Single-Molecule DNA SequencingUsing Nanopore Arrays. Nano Letters 10:2237-2244.Scientific SessionAbstracts<strong>ABRF</strong> <strong>2011</strong> — Technologies to Enable Personalized Medicine • 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!