Poster Abstracts194 PeaksDB: New S<strong>of</strong>tware forSubstantially Improved PeptideIdentification from Orbitrap ETDMass SpectrometryB. Ma 1 , J. Zhang 2 , L. Xin 2 , B. Shan 2 , W. Chen 21University <strong>of</strong> Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada;2Bioinformatics Solutions, Inc., Waterloo, ON,CanadaObjective: To substantially improve the peptide identification sensitivityand accuracy from the Orbitrap ETD data with computational methods.Method: The algorithm takes full advantage <strong>of</strong> the characteristics<strong>of</strong> the Orbitrap ETD data, including: (1) high mass resolution <strong>of</strong> theprecursor ions, and (2) the distributions <strong>of</strong> different fragment iontypes in the MS/MS scans. For the first characteristic, a pre-search stepis conducted to determine the precursor mass error distribution. Thisdoes not only make the precursor mass more accurate by a s<strong>of</strong>twarerecalibration, but also allows the use <strong>of</strong> the mass error as an importantfeature in the peptide-spectrum matching score function. For thesecond characteristic, the frequencies <strong>of</strong> different fragment ion typesat different precursor charge states are statistically learned, and usedin the score calculation. Moreover, the precursor-related ions in theMS/MS spectra are removed. Additionally, the score function makesuse <strong>of</strong> the similarity between a database peptide and the de novosequencing result. Result: PeaksDB was compared against three othersearch engines: MSGF-DB, Mascot, and ZCore. The same shuffled decoydatabase was appended to the target database and searched togetherto estimate the false discovery rate (FDR) <strong>of</strong> each individual engine. Thesame search parameters were used for all engines except that MSGF-DB does not support variable PTMs. If no variable PTM is allowed, thenumbers <strong>of</strong> identified peptides <strong>of</strong> different engines at 1% FDR are:PeaksDB (2356) > MSGF-DB (2147) > Mascot (1459) > ZCore (1030).If a few common PTMs are allowed, the numbers change to PeaksDB(3501) > Mascot (2677) > MSGF-DB (2147) > ZCore(1125). Conclusion:PeaksDB substantially improved the sensitivity and accuracy <strong>of</strong> peptideidentifications on Orbitrap ETD data. At 1% false discovery rate,PeaksDB identified 1.3 to 1.6 times as many peptides as Mascot 2.3.195 IDSieve: Protein IdentificationUsing Peptide pI Filtering <strong>of</strong> MS/MSData for Improved Confidence inIdentificationsN.R. Garge 1 , K.D. West 1 , X. Zhang 1 , J.L. Bundy 2 ,J.L. Stephenson, Jr. 2 , B.J. Cargile 3 , M.K. Bunger 11RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC,United States; 2 Centers for Disease Control andPrevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; 3 SapientProteomics, Morrisville, NC, United StatesThe main challenge <strong>of</strong> tandem mass spectrometry based proteomicanalysis is to correctly match the tandem mass spectra produced to thecorrect peptides. However, the large number <strong>of</strong> protein sequences ina database increases the chances <strong>of</strong> a false positive identification forany given peptide match. Here we present an automated algorithmcalled IDSieve that utilizes target-decoy database search strategy incombination with pI filtering to allow greater confidence for peptideidentifications. IDSieve considers the SEQUEST parameters Xcorrand ΔCn to assign statistical confidence (false discovery rates) tothe peptide matches. The distribution <strong>of</strong> predicted pI values forpeptide spectrum matches (PSMs) is considered separately for eachimmobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing fraction, and matcheswith pI values within 1.5 times inter-quartile range (within pI range)are analyzed independently <strong>of</strong> matches outside the pI ranges. Wetested the performance <strong>of</strong> IDSieve and Peptide/Protein Prophet on theSEQUEST outputs from 60 immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusingfractions derived from mouse intestinal epithelial cell protein extracts.Our results demonstrated that IDSieve produced 1355 more peptidespectrum matches (or 330 more peptides) than Peptide Prophet usingcomparable false positive rate cut<strong>of</strong>fs. Therefore, combining pI filteringwith the appropriate statistical significance measurements allows for ahigher number <strong>of</strong> protein identifications without adversely affectingthe false positive rate. We further tested the performance <strong>of</strong> pI filteringusing ID Sieve when samples were prefractionated using either pHrange 3.5-4.5 or 3-10, and either 24cm or 7cm IPG strips.196 Proteomics-Based Molecular Modelfor Prediction <strong>of</strong> HeterogenicTreatment Response and Discovery<strong>of</strong> New Cell Survival Mechanisms <strong>of</strong>Basal-Like Breast CancerT. Hemström, Y. Lyutvinskiy, R. ZubarevKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenWe aim to build a proteomics-based model for prediction <strong>of</strong> drugresponse and discovery <strong>of</strong> new signaling-related mechanismsexplaining the heterogeneity in treatment response observed in thegroup <strong>of</strong> basal-like breast cancer (BLBC), which is a group <strong>of</strong> breastcancer associated with a relatively short survival <strong>of</strong> patients. A panel<strong>of</strong> cell lines <strong>of</strong> BLBC origin will be subjected to conventional as well asmolecular pathway specific anti-cancer drugs followed by MTT-assayviability assessment. The range <strong>of</strong> drug concentrations will cover themaximal plasma drug concentration <strong>of</strong> patients. Focus will be on celllines exhibiting a high or low sensitivity to treatment. Drug responses <strong>of</strong>such cell lines will be further examined in terms <strong>of</strong> cell cycle distributionand cell death levels and based on these assessments relevant drugconcentrations and exposure times will be chosen. Analysis <strong>of</strong> proteinexpression in cells exposed to relevant treatment conditions will beperformed by LC-MS/MS. By way <strong>of</strong> key node analysis <strong>of</strong> proteinexpression data cellular signaling involved in sensitivity or resistance todrugs will be hypothesized and validated by means <strong>of</strong> anti body-basedtechniques, experimental modulation <strong>of</strong> signaling and analysis <strong>of</strong> cellcycle and cell death. Thereby we will add two more dimensions, whichare the drug response-related changes in activity <strong>of</strong> signaling pathwaysand functional morphological changes, such as apoptotic cell death, togene expression-based models <strong>of</strong> treatment response. Drug responsedata in terms <strong>of</strong> viability, protein expression, and cellular signaling willbe integrated in a computerized model. By focusing on a well definedsubgroup <strong>of</strong> breast cancer exhibiting clinical heterogeneity in anticancerdrug response we have a reasonable good chance to developa fine-tuned model for prediction <strong>of</strong> treatment response and identifycurrently unknown drug resistance mechanisms, which may involve newpossible predictive markers and drug targets.86 • <strong>ABRF</strong> <strong>2011</strong> — Technologies to Enable Personalized Medicine
**197 Multi-Functional SuperparamagneticIron Oxide Particles as CancerTherapeutic AgentsA. Narayanan 1 , P.M. Gannett 1 , J.A. Barr 1 ,R.L. Carroll 2 , S.L. Yedlapalli 21Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center,Department <strong>of</strong> Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences,West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV,United States; 2 C. Eugene Bennett, Department <strong>of</strong>Chemistry, West Virginia University, Morgantown,WV, United StatesSuperparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are magneticnanoparticles may be useful for early detection and treatment <strong>of</strong>cancers. SPIONs provide therapeutic drug-loading capabilities andtargeting specificity through the use <strong>of</strong> antibodies or receptor specifictags. These versatile particles are prime candidates for improvingcurrent means to the treatment <strong>of</strong> cancer and potentially otherdiseases. This multi-disciplinary project includes various milestonesand multiple aims: i) identify and optimize SPION design parametersthat optimize aqueous stability and maximize amphiphilic character,ii) evaluate SPION drug storage and release characteristics, andiii) demonstrate binding and entry into targeted cells. The specificaim <strong>of</strong> this project is the coupling <strong>of</strong> cell-specific targeting agents toSPIONs. An antisense oligonucleotide against Survivin mRNA wassynthesized by solid-phase DNA synthesis with an amino-terminatedlinker on the 3’ end (5’CCCAGCCTTCCAGCTCCTTG-(CH2)6-3’NH2).SPIONs were prepared and then coated with a copolymer containingsurface carboxylic acid groups (-COOH). The carboxylic acid groupswere activated by treatment with N-((3-dimethylamino)-propyl)-Nethylcarbodiimide and coupled to oligonucleotides via the –NH2terminus to the –COOH groups resulting in the formation <strong>of</strong> an amidelinkage between the –COOH groups <strong>of</strong> the SPION and the –NH2 <strong>of</strong>the antisense oligonucleotide. Circular dichroism (CD) studies wereperformed to quantify/optimize coupling and to demonstrate antisenseSurvivin duplex formation was not inhibited by the presence <strong>of</strong> theSPION. CD results were correlated with agarose gel electrophoresisdata and demonstrated oligonucleotides coupling to the SPION andthat the SPION did not significantly alter duplex formation. Futurestudies will target cellular absorption and antisense binding to SurvivinmRNA using confocal microscopy (Supported, in part, from NIHGM081348 grant and the WVU Research Corporation).198 Ultrahigh-Performance Nano LC-MS/MS Analysis <strong>of</strong> Complex ProteomicSamplesG. Gendeh, E.J. Sneekes, B. de Haan, R. SwartDionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, United StatesDetermination <strong>of</strong> the proteome and identification <strong>of</strong> biomarkers arerequired to monitor dynamic changes in living organisms and predictthe onset <strong>of</strong> an illness. One popular method to tackle contemporaryproteomic samples is called shotgun proteomics, in which proteins aredigested, the resulting peptides are separated by high-performanceliquid chromatography (HPLC), and identification is performed withtandem mass spectrometry. Digestion <strong>of</strong> proteins typically leadsto a very large number <strong>of</strong> peptides. For example, digestion <strong>of</strong> a celllysate easily generates 500,000 peptides. The separation <strong>of</strong> thesehighly complex peptide samples is one <strong>of</strong> the major challenges inanalytical chemistry. The main strategy to improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong>packed columns is either to increase column length or to decreasethe size <strong>of</strong> the stationary phase particles. However, to operate thesecolumns effectively, the LC conditions need to be adjusted accordingly.Naturally, the on-line coupling to MS systems has to be taken intoaccount in the optimization process. Here, the authors report on theperformance <strong>of</strong> nano LC columns operating at ultrahigh pressure.The effects <strong>of</strong> column parameters (particle size and column length)and LC conditions (gradient time, flow rate, column temperature)were investigated with reversed-phase (RP) gradient nano LC. HighresolutionLC-MS separations <strong>of</strong> complex proteomic peptide samplesare demonstrated by combining long columns with 2 μm particlesand long gradients. The effects <strong>of</strong> LC parameters on performance andthe influence on peptide identification are discussed.**199 Comprehensive Biomarker DiscoveryPlatform Reveals Qualified MRMAssay for Prediction <strong>of</strong> INF/RibavirinTreatment Response in Hepatitis CPatientsJ.W. Thompson 1 , L.G. Dubois 1 , K. Patel 2 ,J.E. Lucas 1 , J. McCarthy 1 , J.G. McHutchison 2 ,M.A. Moseley 11Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy,Durham, NC, United States; 2 Duke Clinical ResearchInstitute, Durham, NC, United StatesThe current standard <strong>of</strong> care for chronic Heptatitis C (CHC) results insustained viral response in only half <strong>of</strong> patients and also has significantside effects. Improved pre-treatment clinical predictors <strong>of</strong> responseare needed to individualize treatment and select individuals mostappropriate for new therapy. We have identified 10 peptides to 6proteins which can differentiate non-responders from responders withhigh accuracy based on pre-treatment samples. Serum samples wererandomized, immunodepleted (MARS 14), and digested with trypsinprior to LC-MSE or LC-MRM analysis. LC-MSE analyses were performedon a Waters nanoAcquity LC and QToF Premier, while MRM analyseswere performed on nanoAcquity and Xevo TQ. Rosetta Elucidator® wasused to quantify all LC-MSE data. PLGS v2.4 was used to make peptideidentifications. MRM method generation and sample quantitationwas performed with Skyline v0.6. The response signature was initiallyidentified from the analysis <strong>of</strong> 96 samples (Duke Hepatology ClinicalResearch database) by LC-MSE on a QToF mass spectrometer, usingsparse latent factor regression analysis. This yielded a group <strong>of</strong> almost400 candidate peptides which were part <strong>of</strong> 3 metaprotein predictors;these peptides were then curated based on set selection criteria togive 86 target peptides for MRM analysis. MRM analysis <strong>of</strong> the original96 samples yielded a final group <strong>of</strong> 10 peptides which maintainedBonferroni-corrected statistical significance for predicting treatmentresponse. The assay has been qualified by a blinded analysis <strong>of</strong> an allcomersclinical trial sample set (PEDS-C, NIH, n=51) using the MRMmethod, which yielded an AUROC <strong>of</strong> 0.91 with a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 0.828and specificity <strong>of</strong> 0.786. The analysis <strong>of</strong> an additional CHC clinical trialcohort (Chariot, n = 243) is ongoing. This presentation will utilize CHCtreatment response as a case study on the critical analytical, statistical,and clinical cohort requirements to successfully perform biomarkerdiscovery and verification.Poster Abstracts<strong>ABRF</strong> <strong>2011</strong> — Technologies to Enable Personalized Medicine • 87
- Page 7 and 8:
Meeting SponsorsThe Association of
- Page 9 and 10:
Registration ServicesRegistration S
- Page 12 and 13:
Presenter InformationPresenter Info
- Page 14 and 15:
AwardsABRF Annual Award for Outstan
- Page 16 and 17:
ABRF Robert A. Welch Outstanding Re
- Page 18 and 19:
Program-at-a-GlanceProgram-at-a-Gla
- Page 20 and 21:
Sunday, February 20 (Continued)(S1-
- Page 22 and 23:
Sunday, February 20 (Continued)(W3-
- Page 24 and 25:
Monday, February 21 (Continued)12:0
- Page 26 and 27:
Tuesday, February 22 (Continued)9:0
- Page 28 and 29:
Tuesday, February 22 (Continued)(W1
- Page 30 and 31:
Satellite Educational Workshop Spon
- Page 32 and 33:
SW2: An Introduction to Metabolomic
- Page 34 and 35:
SW4: Lean Management in Core Facili
- Page 36 and 37:
Plenary Session AbstractsPlenary Se
- Page 38 and 39: Scientific Session AbstractsScienti
- Page 40 and 41: Scientific SessionAbstractsstatisti
- Page 42 and 43: Scientific SessionAbstracts(S5) Hig
- Page 44 and 45: Scientific SessionAbstracts(S7-2) S
- Page 46 and 47: Workshop Session AbstractsWorkshop
- Page 48 and 49: Workshop SessionAbstractscase incor
- Page 50 and 51: Workshop SessionAbstracts(W7) Cellu
- Page 52 and 53: Workshop SessionAbstractsresolution
- Page 54 and 55: (W14-3) Galaxy Next Generation Sequ
- Page 56 and 57: Research Group Presentation Abstrac
- Page 58 and 59: Research GroupPresentation Abstract
- Page 60 and 61: Research GroupPresentation Abstract
- Page 62 and 63: Poster Session Abstracts**ABRF Post
- Page 64 and 65: Poster Abstractsglobal gene express
- Page 66 and 67: Poster Abstractsdiscussions of cont
- Page 68 and 69: Poster Abstractspossible applicatio
- Page 70 and 71: Poster Abstracts129 Bravo Automated
- Page 73 and 74: distribution. Additionally, we show
- Page 75 and 76: Illumina Genome Analyzer. PicoPlex
- Page 77 and 78: uniformity, reproducibility of enri
- Page 79 and 80: kits for Tempus TM and PAXgene® st
- Page 81 and 82: 165 Benchmarking miRNA ExpressionLe
- Page 83 and 84: Phoenix crystallography robot and a
- Page 85 and 86: Laboratory is located next door and
- Page 87: data of a Thermo Orbitrap instrumen
- Page 91 and 92: pattern of N-linked glycans in form
- Page 93 and 94: advantage of using two separate 15
- Page 95 and 96: allowed absolute quantitation. Comp
- Page 97 and 98: levels between the animal groups. A
- Page 99 and 100: MuDPIT, and off-gel electrophoresis
- Page 101 and 102: 237 Multi-Site Assessment of Proteo
- Page 103 and 104: with good limits of quantification
- Page 105 and 106: 249 Rapid Monoclonal Antibody Glyca
- Page 107 and 108: OOng, J. - 117PPatel, S. - 169Peake
- Page 109 and 110: AnaSpec, Eurogentec Group Booth 417
- Page 111 and 112: FASEB MARC Program Booth 4169650 Ro
- Page 113 and 114: IntegenX, Inc. Booth 2015720 Stoner
- Page 115 and 116: Nonlinear Dynamics Booth 1052530 Me
- Page 117 and 118: Roche Applied Science Booth 5009115
- Page 119 and 120: Exhibit Hall FloorplanGrand Oaks Ba
- Page 121 and 122: Exhibitor List in Booth OrderExhibi
- Page 123 and 124: This workshop will present ways to
- Page 125 and 126: Grand Oaks Ballroom,Rooms P&Q, Leve
- Page 127 and 128: NotesNotesABRF 2011 — Technologie
- Page 129 and 130: Tuesday, February 22 — 12:00 pm -
- Page 131 and 132: MARCH 16-20, 2012 • DISNEY’S CO