- Page 1 and 2: SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF MICROBIAL AN
- Page 3 and 4: MS. ASHA. A. N.DEPT. OF BIOCHEMISTR
- Page 5 and 6: 1 am e~retm-4 gratefill to my super
- Page 7: APSUSACBBEDTAHEPES0-MEI ~ MI'C APMS
- Page 11 and 12: TaxonomvG. mm belongs to the family
- Page 13 and 14: protein) and about 20% of oil, it o
- Page 15 and 16: second substance is spar~ngly solub
- Page 17 and 18: oil and for the manufacture of marg
- Page 19 and 20: 3. Root and lower stem diseases:& S
- Page 21 and 22: special type of cross wall within t
- Page 23 and 24: ---- --primarily (Chand and Logan,
- Page 25 and 26: pollinat~on. fish, blrds. cattle an
- Page 27 and 28: Recent reports In the field of bloc
- Page 29 and 30: solates d~ffered s~gn~ficantlv from
- Page 31 and 32: were very effecuve in reducing the
- Page 33 and 34: hrought out bv the use of e~ther no
- Page 35: d~dn't lnlluencr the perionnance of
- Page 38: vtz.. ptroleum ether. chloroform, a
- Page 41 and 42: 3.2.3. PoLFoned Plate Technlquc The
- Page 43 and 44: through the large arm of the vlscom
- Page 45 and 46: Method: 3 ml of the reaction mixtur
- Page 47 and 48: 4.5. Esrlmarlon of CeNobime: 'The a
- Page 49 and 50: 5.5. Assrssmmr of the eflcacy of mf
- Page 51 and 52: leafspot dtsease tnfectcon was cate
- Page 53 and 54: Chlorophyll b (mglg) = (0.0229 x OD
- Page 55 and 56: To 0.5 ml of the above extract. 2.5
- Page 57 and 58: MctM: One ml of nlnh~drin solution
- Page 59 and 60:
7.4. TOTAL PHENOL: 'l'otal phenol w
- Page 61 and 62:
7.62. MEASUREMENT OF POL YPHENOL OX
- Page 63 and 64:
6 PMSF (10 mM): 17 4 mg of phenylrn
- Page 65 and 66:
~ubhg.- The pl was lmmervd ow-ntght
- Page 67:
t'olumn development and sample elut
- Page 70 and 71:
'I'rblc I tffects ofantagonlst I' h
- Page 73 and 74:
As the ethanol leaf extract of C. g
- Page 75 and 76:
Fgae I E&ts of srgk and dual treatm
- Page 77 and 78:
(76 7 SAlJ) folloued by I'I23 (87 5
- Page 79 and 80:
Tabk 4 Effect of slngle and dual tr
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 3. Elt'ects of s~nglc and du
- Page 83 and 84:
'I'ablt 6 Effect of's~ngle and dual
- Page 85 and 86:
F~gure 4 Efl'ects ol'single and dua
- Page 87 and 88:
MOHPI3OLOCI
- Page 89 and 90:
1'123 + C gigantea (29.50 with 5.8
- Page 91 and 92:
Infected leaves showed (1-0 077 and
- Page 93 and 94:
treatments, PI23 + C. grgunteu cxh~
- Page 95 and 96:
eductton In the starch content (1-3
- Page 97 and 98:
11-58.23 mug), T. horzianum (1- 57.
- Page 99 and 100:
I ahlc 15 I:ll'kcI ofs~ngle ilnd du
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 16 I:l'Vcct of s~ngle and dua
- Page 103 and 104:
Table I7 EfYect of s~ngle and dual
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 19 Effect of slngle and dual
- Page 107 and 108:
(''I'rblr 20. Effect of single and
- Page 109 and 110:
nmoles/ml). 7'. harzianurn (1-1.21
- Page 111:
Figure 5. FTIR SPECTRlIhl OF A("TI\
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 7. "c-~hl~ SPECTRl!hl OF A
- Page 117 and 118:
DISCUSSION
- Page 119 and 120:
-- --of chloroform (10% conc ) show
- Page 121 and 122:
plant. Pseudomonas antibiotics were
- Page 123 and 124:
antlb~otlc (gllotoxin) from the blo
- Page 125 and 126:
Chakrabartl and Basu Chaudhary (197
- Page 127 and 128:
Marion el al. (1994) brought out th
- Page 129 and 130:
seed treatment followed by foliar s
- Page 131 and 132:
Studies on the effects of talc base
- Page 133 and 134:
- --11-56 12 cm) and CGN5 + C' g~ga
- Page 135 and 136:
w~th 7 vrrrde and I hanranum I'he c
- Page 137 and 138:
Wheeler and Black ( 1962, 1 Y63), S
- Page 139 and 140:
Llndow (1984) recorded least reduct
- Page 141 and 142:
compared to the slngle one can be d
- Page 143 and 144:
Protein Content: Leaves of control
- Page 145 and 146:
Gornathl and Gnanaman~ckam (2004) r
- Page 147 and 148:
pathogen/or ~ts actlvlty lnlerfered
- Page 149 and 150:
particularly OH through Fenton reac
- Page 151 and 152:
seedling raised from the treated se
- Page 153 and 154:
disease than the application of a s
- Page 156:
- - - --*f. It rnhrbrted actrvrtles
- Page 159 and 160:
SUMMARY
- Page 161 and 162:
+ C. gigantea. CCiN5 + C. giganlea
- Page 163 and 164:
4 Active principle In C. gigantea l
- Page 165 and 166:
REFERENCES
- Page 167 and 168:
Anton~e JF, Rlner CF, P~erpolnt WS,
- Page 169 and 170:
Bhatnagar PS (1994) Genet~c enhance
- Page 171 and 172:
- - -Carissa 0. Philion V, Rolland
- Page 173 and 174:
Dandurand 1.M,Knudsen GK (1993) lnt
- Page 175 and 176:
Dtxon RK, Garg VK. Kao MV (1 993) I
- Page 177 and 178:
Grtms HD. Mount MS (1984) Influence
- Page 179 and 180:
Howell CR (2002) Conon seedling eme
- Page 181 and 182:
Kauss H (1990) Role of the plasma m
- Page 183 and 184:
Lemanceau P, Bakker PAHM, DeKogel W
- Page 185 and 186:
Mandal BS, Khaushik JC (1995) Inter
- Page 187 and 188:
Muthaiyan MC (2000) Bio-control of
- Page 189 and 190:
*Pameter JR Jr., Whitney HS, Platt
- Page 191 and 192:
Ramamoorthy V. Samiyappan R (2001)
- Page 193 and 194:
- - - -- --Sch~ppen B, Lugtenberg B
- Page 195 and 196:
Soureche@Venguidaragavane R (2002)
- Page 197 and 198:
- - - --Upadhyay JP. Mukhopadhyay A
- Page 199:
Wo,jctech J (1998) B~ocontrol of po