Volume 3 nr 1 / 2011 - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

More documents

Recommendations

Info

mg/kg d.w.Ion V. Popescu, Cristiana Radulescu, Claudia Stihi,42 Gabriela Busuioc, Anca Irina Gheboianu, Valerica Gh. CimpocaSoil (n = 6) 0.42 1.32 2.09 0.83 4.96 0.52 0.03 0.03Amanita phalloides 0.3 0.52 0.64 0.04 3.03 0.01 0.07 nd(n = 6)Soil (n = 6) 0.65 1.83 1.94 0.34 5.73 0.21 0.4 ndArmillariella mellea 0.11 1.1 1.02 nd 2.36 nd nd nd(n = 6)Soil (n=6) 0.24 3.4 7.45 0.04 4.43 0.76 0.16 ndArmillariella tabescens 0.05 0.07 1.19 nd 1.78 nd nd nd(n = 6)Soil (n = 6) 0.73 1.62 3.02 nd 3.61 0.11 nd ndAgaricus campestris 0.06 0.03 1.06 nd 1.32 0.04 0.06 nd(n = 6)Soil (n = 6) 0.91 0.93 2.69 nd 4.02 0.63 0.53 ndHypholoma fasciculare 0.35 0.06 1.12 nd 0.95 0.04 0.03 nd(n = 6)Soil (n = 6) 1.04 0.82 3.06 nd 2.47 0.4 0.29 ndHypholoma pudorinus 0.04 0.08 1.54 0.01 0.09 0.02 0.05 nd(n = 6)Soil (n = 6) 0.10 0.57 3.23 0.48 1.03 0.13 0.53 ndRDS %1.5- 2.2- 1.3- 1.1- 1.9- 2.1- 1.4- 1.7-7.1 8.4 10.1 5.1 11.2 6.3 4.3 10.3 *AA spectrometry concentrations ** EDXRF technique60504030Amanita vaginataAmanita rubescensAmanita phalloidesArmillariella melleaArmillariella tabescensAgaricus campestrisHypholoma fasciculareHypholoma pudorinus20100Zn/10 Cu Fe/10 Mn Mg/10 SeFig 1. Mean concentration of essential elements in fruiting body of wild mushrooms.Copyright © Editura Academiei Oamenilor de Știință din România, 2011Watermark Protected
mg/kg d.wThe Study of Heavy Metal from Environmental Samples by Atomic Techniques 433,532,521,5Amanita vaginataAmanita rubescensAmanita phalloidesArmillariella melleaArmillariella tabescensAgaricus campestrisHypholoma fasciculareHypholoma pudorinus10,50Cd Cr Ni Pb Co TiFig. 2. Mean concentration of heavy metals in fruiting body of wild mushrooms.These toxic and non-toxic young mushroom species accumulated in higherquantities calcium magnesium and zinc, only in two cases (Hypholomafasciculare and Hypholoma pudorinus) absorbed zinc in smaller concentrationcomparatively with substrate samples level (Table 1 and Figure 1). Concerningcopper and iron these mushrooms species have been absorbed in appreciablequantities. The level of the iron is very high in toxic mushrooms species asAmanita phalloides, Hypholoma pudorinus, Agricus campestris and Armillariellamellea comparative with the similar content from soil and this high level dependsby pH of the forest soil (pH 4.98, 5.20, 5.62 and 5.25) and the location of the sites(altitude, type of soil, nature of vegetation). These values of pH lead to asignificant adsorption of zinc by the six mushrooms species, according with theresults presented in Table 2.The amount of the manganese and copper was higher in Hypholoma fasciculareand Hypholoma pudorinus, 2.98 and 4.21 mg/kg d.w., respectively 9.67 and 10.51mg/kg d.w., comparative with the content of the same metals in other studiedmushrooms.The content of selenium was higher in Armillariella mellea, Armillariellatabescens, 2.08 mg/kg d.w.and 1.89 mg/kg d.w., respectively.The content of heavy metals Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, Co and Ti, in the fruiting body oftoxic mushrooms are higher comparative with the similar heavy metals level innon-toxic species (Table 2 and Figure 2).Copyright © Editura Academiei Oamenilor de Știință din România, 2011Watermark Protected
Page 1 and 2: ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTSA N N
Page 3 and 4: ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTSA N N
Page 5 and 6: 3FOREWORDBased on a rich scientific
Page 7 and 8: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
Page 11 and 12: The remanufacturing of an articulat
Page 19 and 20: Influence of Vibrations and Dynamic
Page 27 and 28: Products recovery opportunities at
Page 29 and 30: Products recovery opportunities at
Page 33 and 34: Recycling and Remanufacturing -Two
Page 35 and 36: Recycling and Remanufacturing -Two
Page 39 and 40: The Study of Heavy Metal from Envir
Page 41 and 42: The Study of Heavy Metal from Envir
Page 43: The Study of Heavy Metal from Envir
Page 47 and 48: ConclusionsThe Study of Heavy Metal
Page 51 and 52: Analytical Evaluation of Crack Prop
Page 55 and 56: Y d Notations:Analytical Evaluation
Page 63 and 64: General Considerations Regardingthe
Page 71 and 72: Intelligent Networks, Smart Grids C
Page 81 and 82: Two-dimensional Modelling of Accide
Page 95 and 96:
Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
Page 97 and 98:
Project Indicators -Essential Facto
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
ConclusionsProject Indicators -Esse
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Critical Infrastructures Protection
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Disturbances in The Power Supply Ne
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145:
show all

Volume 3 nr 1 / 2011 - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?