12.07.2015 Views

Volume 3 nr 1 / 2011 - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

Volume 3 nr 1 / 2011 - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

Volume 3 nr 1 / 2011 - Academia Oamenilor de Stiinta din Romania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annals of the Aca<strong>de</strong>my of <strong>Romania</strong>n ScientistsSeries on Engineering SciencesISSN 2066-8570 <strong>Volume</strong> 3, Number 1/<strong>2011</strong> 93PROJECT INDICATORS ESSENTIAL FACTORIN THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT PROPOSALSOF THE STRUCTURAL FUNDSAndrei SZUDER 1Rezumat. Sunt analizate principalele greşeli în redactarea propunerilor <strong>de</strong> proiecte <strong>din</strong>Fondurile Structurale şi se prezintă soluţii <strong>de</strong> remediere a acestora. Este evi<strong>de</strong>ntiataimportanta indicatorilor in diferitele faze ale ciclului <strong>de</strong> proiect si se face o prezentare,cu exemple, a acestora si a modului lor <strong>de</strong> utilizare. Sunt prezentate principalele aspectepractice privind alegerea indicatorilor <strong>de</strong> proiect şi se trag concluzii legate <strong>de</strong> utilizareaindicatorilor în redactarea proiectelor.Abstract. The main mistakes in drafting project proposals from the Structural Funds areanalyzed and solutions are presented to remedy them. Importance of indicators in variousstages of project <strong>de</strong>sign cycle is shown and a presentation of the utilization, withexamples, of key indicators of project is ma<strong>de</strong>. Practical aspects of the main indicators ofproject selection and drawing conclusions about the use of indicators in the drafting ofprojects are presented.Keywords: Structural Funds, Evaluation, Project indicators, Project1. IntroductionMany of the project proposals for Structural Funds which have passed the stage ofchecking the eligibility does not obtain a favorable technical assessment. Thereasons are diverse and mainly are based on a number of misconceptions:Ignorance of basic concepts of Structural Funds. The <strong>de</strong>sign of a projectproposal is reduced to the completion of the application data fields and not to<strong>de</strong>monstrate the project's contribution to the operational objectives of theprogram.SF project proposal must persua<strong>de</strong> all the evaluators, the promoter has un<strong>de</strong>rstoodand <strong>de</strong>monstrated that implementation of the project will contribute primarily tothe program objectives and social <strong>de</strong>velopment of the region to which it belongsand not for other purposes. EU cohesion policy goal is to provi<strong>de</strong> financialassistance to the regions having a per capita income, below 75 percent of the EUaverage in or<strong>de</strong>r to overcome structural weaknesses to reduce economicdisparities, social and territorial cohesion and to enable them to strengthen thecompetitiveness and increase the employment rate.1 Prof., Ph.D., Faculty IMST, TCM Chair, University ”Politehnica” of Bucharest, <strong>Romania</strong>.szu<strong>de</strong>r@ctanm.pub.roCopyright © Editura Aca<strong>de</strong>miei <strong>Oamenilor</strong> <strong>de</strong> Știință <strong>din</strong> România, <strong>2011</strong>Watermark Protected

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!