JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME ... - Cclac.org

ALINORM 07/30/24 Page 21proposed amendments to the Priority List is 1 March. These comments should be forwardeddirectly to the Chair of the Electronic Working Group and JMPR Secretariat.f. Following consideration of comments and amendments, the final Priority List of Compounds will beprepared for circulation to member countries during March. This will be the agenda paper fordiscussion in CCPR plenary.g. Should a late country-sponsored nomination be necessary, it may be considered by the Chair and theJMPR Secretariat. The Chair will provide notice of a late nomination to member countries viaemail correspondence or by means preferred by Codex Secretariat.h. By the time the Priority List of Compound is considered in plenary, member countries will all havehad an opportunity to seek amendment or provide comment, and will still have the CCPR agendapaper well in advance of the meeting.i. Major discussions on the priority list should be handled in plenary.j. Plenary discussion would cover amendments resulting from considerations of the MRLs and anyfinal changes to the priority list which may be considered necessary.k. Plenary discussions would provide full transparency and inclusivity.l. Discussions and the final Priority List of Compounds will be recorded in the draft CCPR report andadopted by the Committee.DISCUSSION PAPER ABOUT ENFORCEMENT OF CODEX MRLs (AGENDA ITEM 10) 21204. The Committee recalled that its last session had discussed the issue relating to the enforcement ofMRLs at the national level and welcomed the proposal of the former Chairperson (Co-chairperson of thecurrent session) to prepare a discussion paper for this session on how Codex MRLs are used at the nationallevel for consideration.205. The Co-chairperson, referring to the Discussion Paper (CX/PR 07/39/10), stressed that, whilenoting that every country has the right to establish its own legislation, including the establishment ofpesticide MRLs, enforcement of national MRLs that were stricter than Codex MRLs could create a tradeproblem. The Co-chairperson also suggested that because this same problem may occur with other CodexStandards, it might be worthwhile to bring this matter to the attention of the Codex Committee on FoodImport and Export Inspection and Certification System (CCFICS).206. The Committee expressed its appreciation for the preparation of this paper and agreed that this wasa very important issue that impacted on the value of the work done by CCPR, the purpose of which was toestablish MRLs in order to protect the consumers’ health and ensure fair practices in food trade.207. Many delegations stressed the importance of this matter and referred to the trade problems arisingwhen importing countries applied national or regional MRLs which were lower than Codex MRLs. Thesedelegations supported the recommendation in the Discussion Paper to collect information on how manynational MRLs were set at a lower level than Codex MRLs with a view to further consideration by theCommittee. Some other delegations were of the view that this issue should be referred to the SPSCommittee.208. Some delegations expressed the view that MRLs should be based on scientific risk assessment andalso drew the attention of the Committee to problems arising from the use of analytical methods in thedetermination of pesticide MRLs.209. The Delegation of the EC referred to its written comments and explained the procedure on howCodex MRLs are taken into account in the EC legislation. The Delegation drew the attention of theCommittee to the Terms of Reference of the Committee, which did not cover the issue under discussion, andstated that the proposal to refer this matter to the CCFICS should be carefully considered as its Terms ofReference did not seem to cover this issue.210. The Codex Secretariat pointed out that the Acceptance Procedure of the Codex standards had beenabolished and therefore no notification of country acceptance was considered in the framework of Codex,and that all the matters related to trade concern could be raised by WTO members at the SPS Committee.21 CX/PR 07/39/10; CRD 7 (comments of the EC, India, Indonesia and Thailand); CRD14 (comments of Argentina);CRD17 (comments of China); CRD 21 (comments of South Africa), CRD 27 (comments of Brazil).