Download - CISAS | Centro de Información y Servicios de Asesoría ...

INFORME ALTERNATIVO SOBRE LA SALUD EN AMERICA LATINATABLE 3POPULATION UNDER THE LINE OFINDIGENCE AND POVERTY (%)NATIONAL AND BOGOTÁ 1997 – 2000NATIONALBOGOTÁLINE OFPOVERTY1997 1999 200050.332.456.346.359.849.6LINE OFINDIGENCE199718.16.1199919.613.2200023.414.9the behavior of the economy, and did not produce redistributiveimpacts.The coverage of the contributory regime, in thesame period, passed from 39.5% to 35.4%, and of thesubsidized regime, from 17.7% to 16.9%. Nevertheless,in the subsidized regime, equity problems wereevident at the time of assignation of subsidies; hence,while the percentage of subsidized poor populationdecreases from 27% to 20,3%, the percentage of subsidizednon-poor population augmented from 9.2% to13.4% (Table 5).In the face of services provision for the periodof 1993-2000, the percentage of people who felt sickTABLE 4CREATION AND DESTRUCTION OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE FORMAL AND INFORMALSECTORS SEVEN CITIES 1992–2000 AND THIRTEEN CITIES 2001–2003(THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE)PERÍOD FORMAL INFORMAL TOTAL % FORMAL % INFORMAL1992 – 19941463918576.0520.951994 – 1996675712454.2745.731996 – 1998142983124.3795.631998 – 2000- 254368113-224.67324.672001 – 20025723729419.3580.652002 – 20031429423660.1239.88and were taken care of diminished in all the quintiles(in this manner general care was reduced from 67% to51%). The inequalities between the richest and poorestquintiles are also evidenced; while the poor population,more vulnerable to illnesses, receives minor care,the quintiles with higher incomes concentrate majorcare.In 1993, within the first quintile 48% of the peoplewho felt sick were taken care of, while in the lastquintile, 80% were taken care of. By the year 2003, the102