OR 103.2–103.3The <strong>Board</strong>, in arriving at a $1 million gross figure, 4 has considered, inter alia, the impact ofsymphony orchestras on commerce and the aspects of orchestra operations as criteria for theexercise of jurisdiction. Symphony orchestras in the United States are classified in fourcategories: college, community, metropolitan, and major. 5 Community orchestrasconstitute the largest group with over 1,000 in number and, for the most part, are composed ofamateur players. The metropolitan orchestras are almost exclusively professional and it isestimated that there are between 75 and 80 orchestras classified as metropolitan. The annualbudget for this category ranges approximately from $250,000 to $1,000,000. The majororchestras are the largest and usually the oldest established musical organizations. All of them arecompletely professional, and a substantial number operates on a year-round basis. For thiscategory the minimum annual budget is approximately $1 million. Presently, there areapproximately 28 major symphony orchestras in the United States. Thus, statistical projectionsbased on data submitted by responding parties, as well as data compiled by the <strong>Board</strong>, disclosethat adoption of such a standard would bring approximately 2 percent of all symphony orchestras,except college, or approximately 28 percent of the professional metropolitan and majororchestras, within reach of the Act. The <strong>Board</strong> is satisfied that symphony orchestras with grossrevenues of $1 million have a substantial impact on commerce and that the figure selected willnot result in an unmanageable increase on the <strong>Board</strong>’s workload. The adoption of a $1 millionstandard, however, does not foreclose the <strong>Board</strong> from reevaluating and revising that standardshould future circumstances deem it appropriate.In view of the foregoing, the <strong>Board</strong> is satisfied that the $1 million annual gross revenue standardannounced today will result in attaining uniform and effective regulation of labor disputesinvolving employees in the symphony orchestra industry whose operations have a substantialimpact on interstate commerce.Sec. 103.3 Horseracing and dogracing industries.—The <strong>Board</strong> will not assert its jurisdiction inany proceeding under sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Act involving the horseracing and dogracingindustries. ∗DECLINATION OF ASSERTION OF JURISDICTIONOn July 18, 1972, the <strong>Board</strong> published in the Federal Register a notice of proposedrulemaking which invited interested parties to submit to it (1) data relevant to defining theextent to which the horseracing and dogracing industries are in commerce as defined in section2(6) of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Act, and to assessing the effect upon commerce of a labordispute in those industries, (2) statements of views or arguments as to the desirability of the<strong>Board</strong> exercising jurisdiction, and (3) data and views concerning the appropriate jurisdictionalstandards which should be established in the event the <strong>Board</strong> decides to promulgate a ruleexercising jurisdiction over those industries. The <strong>Board</strong> received 96 responses to the notice.After careful consideration of all the responses, the <strong>Board</strong> has concluded that it will not assert4 As reflected in the rule, this figure includes revenues from all sources, excepting only contributions which, because of limitationsplaced thereon by the grantor, are not available for operating expenses. These contributions encompassing, for example, contributionsto an endowment fund or building fund, are excluded because of their generally nonrecurring nature. (Cf. Magic Mountain, Inc., 123NLRB 1170.) Income derived from investment of such funds will, however, be counted in determining whether the standard has beensatisfied.5 The latter three categories are defined by the American Symphony Orchestra League principally on the basis of their annualbudgets.∗ The following statement was published by the <strong>Board</strong> concurrently with the issuance of this rule, 38 F.R. 9537.151
103.3 ORjurisdiction over the horseracing and dogracing industries. A rule declining to assert suchjurisdiction has been issued concurrently with the publication of this notice. 1The jurisdiction of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong> under section 9 of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong><strong>Relations</strong> Act, as amended, 2 to determine questions concerning representation, and under section10 of the Act to prevent unfair labor practices, extends to all such matters which “affectcommerce” as defined in section 2(7) of the Act. 3 Under section 14(c) of the Act, 4 the <strong>Board</strong> inits discretion may decline to assert jurisdiction over labor disputes involving any class or categoryof employers if such labor disputes will not have a substantial impact in commerce and providedthat it had not asserted jurisdiction over such class or category prior to August 1, 1959. The <strong>Board</strong>has consistently declined to assert jurisdiction over labor disputes in the horseracing anddogracing industries 5 as well as over labor disputes involving employers whose operations are anintegral part of these racing industries. 6 After carefully considering the responses, the <strong>Board</strong> hasdecided not to alter its position with respect to the horseracing and dogracing industries and hasconcluded that it will continue to decline to assert jurisdiction over labor disputes in theseindustries.In prior decisions, the <strong>Board</strong> declined to assert jurisdiction over these industries noting, interalia, the extensive State control over the industries. It appears that State law sets racing dates ofthe tracks; State law determines the percentage share of the gross wagers that goes to the State;and State law determines the percentage of gross wagers to be retained by the track. In addition,the State licenses employees, exercises close supervision over the industries through State racingcommissions, and in many States retains the right to effect the discharge of employees whoseconduct jeopardizes the “integrity” of the industry. As the industries constitute a substantialsource of revenue to the States, a unique and special relationship has developed between theStates and these industries which is reflected by the States continuing interest in and supervisionover the industries.In addition, the sporadic nature of the employment in these industries encourages a highpercentage of temporary part-time workers and results in a high turnover of employees and arelatively unstable work force. This is further evidenced by a pattern of short workhours andsporadic and short periods of active employment with any given employer.Besides minimizing the impact on commerce of the industries, this pattern of short-termemployment also gives us pause with respect to the effectiveness of any proposed exercise of ourjurisdiction in view of the serious administrative problems which would be posed both byattempts to conduct elections and to make effective any remedies for alleged violations of the Actwithin the highly compressed timespan of active employment which is characteristic of theindustries.Thus, we have concluded that the operations of these industries continue to be peculiarly relatedto, and regulated by, local governments and, further that our exercise of jurisdiction would not1 See title 29, ch. I, pt. 103, supra.2 61 Stat. 140, 143, 146, 29 U.S.C. secs. 158, 159, 160.3 61 Stat. 137, 29 U.S.C. sec. 152(7). See N.L.R.B. v. Fainblatt et al., 306 U.S. 601.4 29 U.S.C. sec. 164.5 Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc., 90 NLRB 20 (horseracing track); Jefferson Downs, Inc., 125 NLRB 386 (horseracing track); MeadowStud Inc., 130 NLRB 1202 (horse owner/breeder); Hialeah Race Course, Inc., 125 NLRB 388 (horseracing track); Walter A. Kelley,139 NLRB 744 (horse owners/breeders); Centennial Turf Club, Inc., 192 NLRB 698 (horseracing track); Yonkers Raceway Inc., 196NLRB 373 (horseracing track); Jacksonville Kennel Club, Case 12–RC–3815, May 5, 1971 (dogracing track) (not reported in NLRBvolumes).6 Pinkerton’s <strong>National</strong> Detective Agency, 114 NLRB 1363; Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union,Local 343 (Resort Concessions, Inc.), 148 NLRB 208.152
- Page 3 and 4:
R&RNATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
- Page 5 and 6:
R&RMay 2, 1974February 10, 1975Febr
- Page 7 and 8:
R&ROctober 28, 1991November 8, 1991
- Page 9 and 10:
R&RJuly 16, 2007 72 FR 38778§102.1
- Page 11 and 12:
117
- Page 13 and 14:
TABLE OF CONTENTSS of P101.29 Proce
- Page 15 and 16:
101.2-101.4 S of PSubpart B—Unfai
- Page 17 and 18:
101.8-101.9 S of Pnovel and complex
- Page 19 and 20:
101.10-101.11 S of Pfor the General
- Page 21 and 22:
101.13-101.16 S of Pthe closing of
- Page 23 and 24:
101.17 S of PSubpart C—Representa
- Page 25 and 26:
101.18-101.19 S of Pdismissal by fi
- Page 27 and 28:
101.19-101.21 S of PD.C. The record
- Page 29 and 30:
101.21 S of P(d) The parties have t
- Page 31 and 32:
101.23 S of Punless otherwise order
- Page 33 and 34:
101.26-101.27 S of PSubpart E—Ref
- Page 35 and 36:
101.30 S of Pwill institute formal
- Page 37 and 38:
101.34-101.36 S of Psupport of thei
- Page 39 and 40:
101.39-101.41 S of PSubpart H—Adv
- Page 41 and 42:
R & RTABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONT
- Page 43 and 44:
R & RTABLE OF CONTENTSSectionExcept
- Page 45 and 46:
R & RTABLE OF CONTENTSSectionSubpar
- Page 47 and 48:
R & RTABLE OF CONTENTSSection102.13
- Page 49 and 50:
R & R 102.1-102.8NATIONAL LABOR REL
- Page 51 and 52:
R & R 102.9-102.13Subpart B—Proce
- Page 53 and 54:
R & R 102.15-102.19COMPLAINTSec. 10
- Page 55 and 56:
R & R 102.20-102.23ANSWERSec. 102.2
- Page 57 and 58:
R & R 102.25-102.28Sec. 102.25 Ruli
- Page 59 and 60:
R & R 102.30WITNESSES, DEPOSITIONS,
- Page 61 and 62:
R & R 102.32information from such i
- Page 63 and 64:
R & R 102.34-102.35HEARINGSSec. 102
- Page 65 and 66:
R & R 102.38-102.43chief judge in N
- Page 67 and 68:
R & R 102.45ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDG
- Page 69 and 70:
R & R 102.46(3) Requests for extens
- Page 71 and 72:
R & R 102.48-12050PROCEDURE BEFORE
- Page 73 and 74:
R & R 102.52-102.54COMPLIANCE PROCE
- Page 75 and 76:
R & R 102.57-102.59without taking e
- Page 77 and 78:
R & R 102.61(4) A description of th
- Page 79 and 80:
R & R 102.63by the Board, provided
- Page 81 and 82:
R & R 102.65and upon such terms as
- Page 83 and 84:
R & R 102.67of the record except up
- Page 85 and 86:
R & R 102.68-102.69(j) Upon transfe
- Page 87 and 88:
R & R 102.69election pursuant to pa
- Page 89 and 90:
R & R 102.69Director, or to append
- Page 91 and 92:
R & R 102.71(1) That a substantial
- Page 93 and 94:
R & R 102.77-102.80warranted, and t
- Page 95 and 96:
R & R 102.83-102.85Subpart E—Proc
- Page 97 and 98:
R & R 102.89-102.91Subpart F—Proc
- Page 99 and 100:
R & R 102.94-102.97Subpart G—Proc
- Page 101 and 102:
R & R 102.104-102.110determine whet
- Page 103 and 104:
R & R 102.111Subpart I—Service an
- Page 105 and 106:
Service of documents by a party on
- Page 107 and 108:
R & R 102.115-102.116Subpart J—Ce
- Page 109 and 110: R & R 102.117(3) Copies of forms pr
- Page 111 and 112: R & R 102.117of estimation (this es
- Page 113 and 114: R & R 102.117adverse determination
- Page 115 and 116: R & R 102.117not be limited to: Cer
- Page 117 and 118: R & R 102.117writing or in person d
- Page 119 and 120: R & R 102.117Agency. Proof of autho
- Page 121 and 122: R & R 102.117enforcement personnel,
- Page 123 and 124: R & R 102.117restrictions of this p
- Page 125 and 126: 102.118 R & RPrivacy Act of 1974, 5
- Page 127 and 128: 102.121 R & RSubpart M—Constructi
- Page 129 and 130: 102.123-102.125 R & RSubpart O—Am
- Page 131 and 132: 102.128-102.130 R & R(c) In a poste
- Page 133 and 134: 102.133 R & Ror knowingly causes a
- Page 135 and 136: 102.136 R & RSubpart R—Advisory C
- Page 137 and 138: 102.141 R & Rtaken with respect to
- Page 139 and 140: 102.143 R & RSubpart T—Awards of
- Page 141 and 142: 102.147 R & R(b) The application sh
- Page 143 and 144: 102.150-102.152 R & Rdocument. Noti
- Page 145 and 146: 102.156-102.158 R & RSubpart U--Deb
- Page 147 and 148: R & R 102.161Sec. 102.161 Notificat
- Page 149 and 150: 102.168-102.170 R & RSubpart V--Deb
- Page 151 and 152: 102.175-102.177 R & Rwill consider
- Page 153 and 154: 102.177 R & Rmitigation; and an exp
- Page 155 and 156: R & R27—Denver...................
- Page 157 and 158: 103.1 ORNATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BO
- Page 159: 103.1-103.2 ORconsidering all the v
- Page 163 and 164: 103.20 ORSubpart B—Election Proce
- Page 165 and 166: 103.20 ORholidays. As noted above,
- Page 167 and 168: 103.30 ORSubpart C—Appropriate Ba
- Page 169 and 170: 103.100 ORSubpart F—Remedial Orde
- Page 171 and 172: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageWho may fil
- Page 173 and 174: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageFees and ex
- Page 175 and 176: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageFiling of .
- Page 177 and 178: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageWhere to fi
- Page 179 and 180: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageDetermined
- Page 181 and 182: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageDisposition
- Page 183 and 184: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageDeterminati
- Page 185 and 186: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageClarificati
- Page 187 and 188: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPagePriority of
- Page 189 and 190: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageWithdrawal
- Page 191 and 192: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageCertificati
- Page 193 and 194: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageDocuments e
- Page 195 and 196: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPagerefusal to
- Page 197 and 198: TOPICAL INDEXSectionPageReview by G
- Page 199 and 200: 189
- Page 201 and 202: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDthan
- Page 203 and 204: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDfull
- Page 205 and 206: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDVIII.
- Page 207 and 208: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDon be
- Page 209 and 210: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD3. Th
- Page 211 and 212:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDto Bo
- Page 213 and 214:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDOrgan
- Page 215 and 216:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 201.
- Page 217 and 218:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 203-
- Page 219 and 220:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDAppen
- Page 221 and 222:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDand i
- Page 223 and 224:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDWythe
- Page 225 and 226:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDDougl
- Page 227 and 228:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDAlger
- Page 229 and 230:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDCommo
- Page 231 and 232:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDNew Y
- Page 233 and 234:
226
- Page 235 and 236:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACTAlso ci
- Page 237 and 238:
(6) The term “commerce” means t
- Page 239 and 240:
to exercise all of the powers of th
- Page 241 and 242:
(2) to dominate or interfere with t
- Page 243 and 244:
Provided, That nothing contained in
- Page 245 and 246:
(3) notifies the Federal Mediation
- Page 247 and 248:
such labor organization of opportun
- Page 249 and 250:
(3) No election shall be directed i
- Page 251 and 252:
state its findings of fact and shal
- Page 253 and 254:
as in the case of an application by
- Page 255 and 256:
INVESTIGATORY POWERSSec. 11. [§ 16
- Page 257 and 258:
(c) [Power of Board to decline juri
- Page 259 and 260:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACTLABOR
- Page 261 and 262:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACT(c) [
- Page 263 and 264:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACTis cr
- Page 265 and 266:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACT(c) [
- Page 267 and 268:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACTConci
- Page 269 and 270:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACTdeliv
- Page 271 and 272:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACTto su
- Page 273:
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS ACTTITLE