12.07.2015 Views

Bringing-Them-Home-Report-Web

Bringing-Them-Home-Report-Web

Bringing-Them-Home-Report-Web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It is possible for Aboriginal people who were removed from their traditional families tobecome a participant in a collective claim by a group or clan of Aboriginals. However, inorder for this to happen it would first be necessary for them to be accepted as a member ofthe Aboriginal community which has collectively maintained the requisite use and spiritualand cultural ties to the land that have allowed the group’s native title to survive.As a matter of practicality, Aboriginal people who have been removed from their familiesmay be accepted back into Aboriginal communities. The issue is one for the Aboriginal clanor group to decide. However, there may be traditional laws and customs which govern theacceptance of people in the community and it is possible they may be refused permission torejoin a community, or refused recognition as a member of a community, because they havenot participated in the traditional and cultural activities of that community for a length oftime. If this is the case, the disentitlement to claim as a member of a group would be a directresult of the forced separation of that person from the community as a child (Corrs ChambersWestgarth submission 704 page 27).Including a person who has yet to be fully reintegrated into the traditional lawsrelating to the land in a claimant group may jeopardise the land claim under somelegislation, for example the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976(Cth), although the Inquiry received no evidence that this has occurred. However,once a claim is successful (for example under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)), oronce traditional lands have been granted (for example under the Pitjantjatjara LandRights Act 1981 (SA)), it is entirely up to the traditional owners to decide whetherthey will accept a person taken away in childhood and permit him or her to share inthe enjoyment of the land.Where collective land ownership is vested in an association, the rules of theassociation usually provide for the acceptance of new members (for exampleAboriginal Land Grant (Jervis Bay Territory) Act 1986 (Cth); Aboriginal Land RightsAct 1983 (NSW)).Under some legislation a requirement of a period of uninterrupted residence isimposed before the person can become a member of the land-owning group (forexample with respect to Framlingham Forest, Victoria, under the Aboriginal Land(Lake Condah and Framlingham Forest) Act 1987 (Cth)).We can’t even claim for that, because we’re not living on it. But that’s not our fault.The Government took us off our land, so how can we get land rights when this is whatthe Government has done to us?Confidential evidence 450, New South Wales: woman removed at 2 years in the 1940s, firstto Bomaderry Children’s <strong>Home</strong>, then to Cootamundra Girls’ <strong>Home</strong>; now working to assistformer Cootamundra inmates.I have no legal claim to come back here. I can’t speak on the board of management,I’m not a living member out here on this mission. What right have I got to speak outhere? And this is the way that a lot of the Aboriginals living on this mission see me – asa blow-in, a blow-through. Yet I’ve got family that are buried out here on the mission… and I have no rights. As an Aboriginal I don’t have any rights out here.Confidential evidence 207, Victoria: man whose mother was removed from Lake Tyers as achild; mother buried at Lake Tyers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!