12.07.2015 Views

Bringing-Them-Home-Report-Web

Bringing-Them-Home-Report-Web

Bringing-Them-Home-Report-Web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

government policy until at least 1965: Indigenous people, including children, were to beisolated on missions and government settlements well away from non-Indigenous society.The protectionist policy proposed by Meston was put into effect by the AboriginalProtection and Restriction of the Sale of Opium Act 1897, replaced in 1939 by theAboriginals Preservation and Protection Act and the Torres Strait Islanders Act. TheseActs allowed government officials under the control of the Chief Protector and, after1939, the Director of Native Affairs to ‘remove’ Indigenous people to and betweenreserves and to separate children from their families. All that was required under the Actof 1897 was an administrative decision authorised by the Minister. There was no courthearing.Although families were generally removed together this did not always happen.Children of mixed descent were targeted for removal from their communities. The 1897Act also provided that ‘orphaned’ and ‘deserted’ ‘half caste’ children could be removedto an orphanage.In the case of half-caste children, especially girls, already living in camps, it is desirable thatthese, where old enough, should be removed at once to the mission station or reformatory: on noaccount should they be allowed to be given into private hands. The State takes upon itself theresponsibility – a serious one to my mind – of taking such children from their aboriginalenvironments, but at the same time hands them over to the various mission stations, which arenow under direct Government supervision and control (1902 Annual <strong>Report</strong> of the NorthernProtector of Aboriginals page 10).After 1939 use of the removal power was even easier and more unchecked becausethe Director of Native Affairs was made the guardian of all Indigenous children under 21.The power of removal was vested in him rather than the Minister. He had virtually totalcontrol of the lives of Indigenous children.The influence of Chief Protector BleakleyJ W Bleakley, Chief Protector and Director of Native Affairs from 1913 to 1942,exercised a major influence over Queensland policy and the practices of officials and themissions. He believed firmly in the segregation of Indigenous people from non-Indigenous people.It is only by complete separation of the two races that we can save him (‘the Aborigine’) fromhopeless contamination and eventual extinction, as well as safeguard the purity of our own blood(Chief Protector <strong>Report</strong> 1919 page 7 quoted by Long 1970 on page 97).Bleakley was a strong supporter of the missions.Few realise the value of work done by missions. Not only do they protect the child races from theunscrupulous white, but they help to preserve the purity of the white race from the grave socialdangers that always threaten where there is a degraded race living in loose condition at its backdoor (Bleakley 1961 on page 124).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!