12.07.2015 Views

6 Bases during the Cold War

6 Bases during the Cold War

6 Bases during the Cold War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mock raids mounted by U.S. units in Turkey and elsewhere – resulted in someserious incidents in which U.S. ferret aircraft were shot down and <strong>the</strong>ir crewskilled or captured. Some flights originating at Brize Norton in <strong>the</strong> U.K. apparentlytraversed <strong>the</strong> entire Soviet Arctic coastline, emerging at <strong>the</strong> Barents Sea.The area between <strong>the</strong> Caspian Sea and <strong>the</strong> Sea of Azov was also apparently afocal point of U.S. surveillance missions utilizing Turkish and Iranian airspace,some staged originally from West Germany and Cyprus.U.S. use of ground-based SIGINT stations, obviously crucial to variousaspects of nuclear deterrence, dates well back into <strong>the</strong> postwar period. Onesource reported that this had earlier involved some 40 stations in at least 14countries, ranging from small, mobile field units to sprawling complexes such as<strong>the</strong> Air Force Security Headquarters in West Germany. These were said to haveinvolved some 30,000 personnel, with a minimum of 4000 radio-interceptionconsoles operated in such varied locales as nor<strong>the</strong>rn Japan, <strong>the</strong> Khyber Pass inPakistan and an island in <strong>the</strong> Yellow Sea off <strong>the</strong> coast of Korea.Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>se COMINT land stations had to be supplemented by numerousairborne and seaborne radio-interception facilities, particularly after Soviet andaligned nations’ military forces switched to VHF radios <strong>during</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1950s, afterwhich adequate coverage demanded getting closer to transmitters and overcomingterrain features such as mountains. At any time, several dozen airborne<strong>Bases</strong> <strong>during</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong> 107İ 2007 Robert E. Harkavylistening posts were said to have been in intermittent operation, flying out ofsuch bases as Kimpo Airfield in Korea, Clark Air Force Base in <strong>the</strong> Philippines,and many o<strong>the</strong>rs. Added to <strong>the</strong>se were some 12 to 15 spy ships, such as <strong>the</strong> illfatedPueblo and Liberty, which also presumably required access to foreignports for replenishment.Strategic nuclear forces: missile launchers and platforms15Generally speaking, <strong>the</strong> late <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong> period saw <strong>the</strong> U.S. and <strong>the</strong> USSR leftwith only minimal dependence on foreign facilities – Soviet dependence wasrelatively less for <strong>the</strong>ir strategic nuclear launchers, involving <strong>the</strong> familiar triad ofICBMs, SLBMs and long-range bombers. Of course, this is not to ignore <strong>the</strong>fact, particularly as it pertained to U.S. forces, that some launchers designated as<strong>the</strong>ater weapons could serve strategic purposes in that <strong>the</strong>ir warheads could havebeen delivered into <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union.All of <strong>the</strong> U.S. ICBMs (450 Minuteman IIs, 550 Minuteman IIIs and a fewremnant Titan IIs which were phased out as <strong>the</strong> new MX-Peacekeeper wasphased in) were housed in silos within <strong>the</strong> continental U.S. – <strong>the</strong>y representedover 2100 accurate warheads. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> Soviet ICBM forces (448 SS-11s,60 SS-13s, 150 SS-17s, 308 SS-18s, 360 SS-19s, 72 SS-25s), of some 1398ICBMs with some 6354 warheads, were sited entirely within <strong>the</strong> USSR.The Soviet SSBN forces (983 SLBMs in 77 submarines, of which 944SLBMs and 62 submarines were under <strong>the</strong> SALT Treaty; and 39 SLBMs on 15submarines were outside it) were based entirely at Soviet homeland bases, in <strong>the</strong>Kola Peninsula area at Polyarny and Severomorsk, and at Petropavlovsk andVladivostok in <strong>the</strong> Far East. No foreign bases were used for refueling, maintenanceor crew changes. By contrast to <strong>the</strong> U.S. only some 15–20 Soviet submarineswere normally away from <strong>the</strong>ir bases; perhaps 10–12 on station at anygiven time.The U.S. SSBN force, which earlier made extensive use of facilities at HolyLoch (Scotland), Rota (Spain) and at U.S.-owned Guam, utilized only <strong>the</strong> firstnamedof <strong>the</strong>se, with its o<strong>the</strong>r three main bases in <strong>the</strong> continental U.S. at KingsBay (Georgia), Bangor (Washington) and Charleston (South Carolina). Thedevelopment of <strong>the</strong> longer-range Poseidon and Trident missiles (with ranges of4000 miles) allowed for utilization of firing stations nearer U.S. bases andfur<strong>the</strong>r from <strong>the</strong> USSR, hence reducing requirements for firing stations in <strong>the</strong>western Pacific (Guam) and in <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean (Rota).Little was publicly known about where <strong>the</strong>se submarines patrolled, but <strong>the</strong>yare thought to have transited to firing stations in <strong>the</strong> Arctic, North Atlantic andNorth Pacific oceans and in <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean Sea, with about 30 percent of <strong>the</strong>force on station on day-to-day alert, and a roughly equal proportion in transit oron training missions. The use of Holy Loch as a forward base (for submarineshomeported at Groton, Connecticut) allowed more to be on station than o<strong>the</strong>rwisewould have been feasible, and it is also to be noted that 400 Poseidon warheadsdeployed on submarines operating out of Holy Loch were designated forPage 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!