12.07.2015 Views

6 Bases during the Cold War

6 Bases during the Cold War

6 Bases during the Cold War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This provided <strong>the</strong> U.S. access to a plethora of air and naval bases: Gibraltar,Malta, Cyprus, <strong>the</strong> Suez Canal Zone, Aden, Libya (Wheelus Air Force Base),Gan in <strong>the</strong> Maldives Islands, Mombasa, Simonstown in South Africa, Freetown,Singapore, Hong Kong, etc., added to by access to o<strong>the</strong>r facilities in Canada andAustralia. France’s remnant empire allowed for some U.S. access as well,particularly important in <strong>the</strong> 1950s, regarding bomber bases and communicationsfacilities in Morocco. During <strong>the</strong> period after 1945, of course, <strong>the</strong> U.S.occupied Germany and Japan, and had free access to bases all over occupiedEurope, in France, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, Belgium, Italy, Greece and Turkey. In <strong>the</strong>Central Pacific, <strong>the</strong> U.S. took over <strong>the</strong> former Japanese League of Nations mandatesin <strong>the</strong> Caroline, Mariana and Marshall Islands, with few restrictions on<strong>the</strong>ir use for bases.In <strong>the</strong> early 1950s <strong>the</strong>re was <strong>the</strong> full onset of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Korean <strong>War</strong>,and NSC-68 as <strong>the</strong> formalization of <strong>the</strong> containment policy. Importantly, <strong>the</strong>rewas also <strong>the</strong> construction by <strong>the</strong> U.S. of a network of formal alliances, both<strong>Bases</strong> <strong>during</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong> 95İ 2007 Robert E. Harkavymultilateral and bilateral, that formed a physical barrier around what had cometo be called <strong>the</strong> Sino-Soviet bloc after 1949, a barrier extending around Eurasiafrom Ireland and Norway around to Japan. There was NATO, CENTO (<strong>the</strong>Baghdad Pact) and SEATO, <strong>the</strong> first two hinged on Turkey, <strong>the</strong> latter two onPakistan, abetted by ANZUS and <strong>the</strong> bilateral defense pacts with Japan, SouthKorea (after 1950) and Taiwan (after 1950).3 Arms transfers and o<strong>the</strong>r forms ofsecurity and economic assistance underpinned all of <strong>the</strong>se alliances, and with<strong>the</strong>m went a very permissive and comprehensive basing structure for <strong>the</strong> U.S., ineffect in exchange for security against <strong>the</strong> perceived menace of Soviet andChinese expansionism, both in terms of possible military attack and internal subversion.The physical structure of this basing network was neatly reflective of arimland defense posture around Eurasia à la <strong>the</strong> geopolitical formulations ofMahan and Spykman.Functions of <strong>the</strong> U.S. <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong> basing systemAs <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong> evolved in <strong>the</strong> 1950s and 1960s, <strong>the</strong> functions of <strong>the</strong> U.S.global basing structure came to be divided along <strong>the</strong> lines of nuclear deterrenceand conventional deterrence and power projection. The latter category fur<strong>the</strong>rsubsumed <strong>the</strong> use of bases for direct military interventions, arms resupply <strong>during</strong>conflict, coercive diplomacy (“gunboat diplomacy”) and “presence” (showing<strong>the</strong> flag).4The initial use of forward bases came with <strong>the</strong> stationing of B-29 bombers in<strong>the</strong> U.K. in <strong>the</strong> late 1940s. Following that was <strong>the</strong> stationing, in <strong>the</strong> 1950s, of B-47 “Reflex Force” bombers in <strong>the</strong> U.K., Spain and Morocco.5 Shortly after that,<strong>the</strong> B-52 bombers were introduced as <strong>the</strong> backbone of SAC, and <strong>the</strong>y were allbased along <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn rim of <strong>the</strong> continental U.S., in Maine, New Hampshire,upstate New York and Michigan. But, <strong>the</strong>y required tanker refueling, bases forwhich were established in Greenland (Thule), Canada (Gander), Iceland(Keflavik) and in <strong>the</strong> U.K. Additionally, numerous bases in Europe and elsewherewere designated as recovery bases for <strong>the</strong> bombers should <strong>the</strong>y exit <strong>the</strong>USSR after a bombing raid.Later in <strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>War</strong>, forward based tactical aircraft (FBS) – F-4s, F-16s,and F-15s – were configured for nuclear weapons, based mostly in Germany, butable to mount missions from o<strong>the</strong>r bases in Europe, in Iceland, <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands,Italy and Turkey.6 Additionally, F-111E bombers based in <strong>the</strong> U.K. weredeployed as nuclear attack aircraft that could reach into <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union.Nuclear armed attack aircraft were also based in South Korea and <strong>the</strong> Philippines,capable of reaching <strong>the</strong> USSR and China. Tanker aircraft based on Guam,Okinawa, Japan and <strong>the</strong> Philippines could also serve in relation to nuclear-armedaircraft.In <strong>the</strong> late 1950s, in response to <strong>the</strong> “missile scare,” i.e., <strong>the</strong> looming threat ofSoviet ICBM deployments ahead of similar U.S. deployments, <strong>the</strong> U.S. basedmedium-range ballistic missiles, Thor and Jupiter, in <strong>the</strong> U.K., Italy and Turkey.In Asia, Matador and Mace land-based missiles were deployed in Okinawa and96 <strong>Bases</strong> <strong>during</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong>İ 2007 Robert E. HarkavyPage 3Page 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!