12.07.2015 Views

6 Bases during the Cold War

6 Bases during the Cold War

6 Bases during the Cold War

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

systems (an exception, of course was <strong>the</strong> VLF facilities used to communicate withsubmarines, perhaps too large to be placed aboard ships). As it is, however, relativeto what was known about <strong>the</strong> U.S., <strong>the</strong>re was scant information on how <strong>the</strong>USSR utilized <strong>the</strong> whole of <strong>the</strong> frequency spectrum for various purposes, how ittried to circumvent countermeasures by redundancy, and so forth.For <strong>the</strong> most part, Soviet use of overseas communications facilities focusedon <strong>the</strong> downlinks for <strong>the</strong> Molniya communications satellites, of which <strong>the</strong>rewere some 40 aloft at a given time.A U.S. government report provided some information (and a map) on <strong>the</strong>general locations of Soviet tracking ships and, hence, of <strong>the</strong> locales where <strong>the</strong>ymight have sought port access or at least mooring buoys. Among <strong>the</strong>m, off SableIsland, Nova Scotia; in <strong>the</strong> western Mediterranean near Gibraltar; <strong>the</strong> Gulf ofGuinea; off Mozambique and Madagascar; off Honduras, east of <strong>the</strong> Philippines;and north of New Zealand. Large tracking ships apparently moored at Havanaand/or Santiago while tracking some flights; Trinidad was also mentioned in thiscontext. Some of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r locations provided rationales for periodic access toConakry or Maputo, maybe also to Nicaragua, as well as providing fur<strong>the</strong>r indicationsof <strong>the</strong> Soviet need for access somewhere in <strong>the</strong> South Pacific. (The U.S.government report stated that three large Soviet ships took turns serving in <strong>the</strong>Caribbean area to extend Soviet deep-space coverage.)The USSR depended considerably less on land-based SIGINT collection stationsthan <strong>the</strong> U.S., though, it utilized a variety of means; satellites, surface shipsand submarines, aircraft, equipment based in embassies and so on. And again,similar to <strong>the</strong> situation with respect to space tracking and early warning, one hadto be aware of <strong>the</strong> sometimes only indirect importance of external access; forinstance, for fueling ships used in lieu of land facilities.The USSR was reported to have had major SIGINT facilities at Lourdes,Cuba; Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam; Ethiopia (two); South Yemen; Syria; and<strong>Bases</strong> <strong>during</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cold</strong> <strong>War</strong> 139İ 2007 Robert E. HarkavyAfghanistan. That at Lourdes was reported to be devoted to interpretation ofsatellite communications. There may have been additional ground stations inLibya and Iraq, though <strong>the</strong> fate of <strong>the</strong> latter might be questioned since Moscowhad given only modest support to Iraq in its war with Iran, particularly in <strong>the</strong>early stages, in part because of <strong>the</strong> cross-pressures from its relationship withLibya.The Lourdes facility was a large one, operated by some 2000 Soviet personnel;it became a prominent issue in 1979 at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> imbroglio in <strong>the</strong> U.S.over <strong>the</strong> Soviet “Cuban brigade” amid <strong>the</strong> SALT II confirmation hearings. Thefacility of 50 buildings housed an antenna field, satellite receiver and so on, andtargeted U.S. civilian and military communications, that is, B-52 communications,Fort Benning and Cape Canaveral, <strong>the</strong> naval headquarters at Norfolk, etc.According to Richelson, <strong>the</strong> Lourdes facility, complemented by a similar one in<strong>the</strong> USSR, “gave complete coverage of <strong>the</strong> global beams of all U.S. geosynchronouscommunications satellites.”At Cam Ranh Bay, <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union had an important facility from which tomonitor both land and ocean-based emissions – <strong>the</strong>re were two HF/DF sites usedto gain locational data on U.S. fleet units in <strong>the</strong> Pacific. The U.S. bases in <strong>the</strong>Philippines were obvious targets.The four sites in Afghanistan aided collection, variously, vis-à-vis China,Pakistan, Iran and <strong>the</strong> Persian Gulf area. And, of course, <strong>the</strong>se sitesmerely added to <strong>the</strong> capabilities of hundreds of SIGINT sites located within <strong>the</strong>USSR.The Soviet Union had some o<strong>the</strong>r land-based intelligence-interception facilitieslocated outside <strong>the</strong> USSR. In Laos, <strong>the</strong>re was an air-surveillance radar, obviouslydirected against China. According to <strong>the</strong> IISS, <strong>the</strong>re was a Sovietmonitoring station (elsewhere identified as a radar site) in Sao Tome andPrincipe. In Cuba, along with <strong>the</strong> Lourdes facility, <strong>the</strong>re were also air-defensesurveillance radars, <strong>the</strong> Tall King system, apparently operated by Soviet personnel.In East Germany, <strong>the</strong>re were HF-finding antennas used in connection withjamming operations, in Poland, a SIGINT station and HF direction-finder atSinajscie, and at Bierdzany a receiver site for a Soviet OTH radar transmitterlocated at Kiev. Throughout Eastern Europe, <strong>the</strong>re were large numbers of airsurveillanceradars equivalent to <strong>the</strong> NATO NADGE system – in Hungary, forinstance, some 130 sites manned by Soviet personnel were reported.Page 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!