• The student requires direct instruction in multiple settings to successfullygeneralize skills to natural settings, including home, school and community;and• 4. The student’s instructional program includes participation in the generaleducation curriculum to the extent appropriate and may also include afunctional and life skills component.The following factors MAY NOT serve as the sole basis for a determination that athestudent should participate in the <strong>CMT</strong><strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>Checklist</strong>:• • The student’s disability category (e.g., intellectual disability, autism, etc.);• • The student’s placement (e.g., self-contained classroom, regional program,etc);• • The amount of time spent with non-disabled peers (e.g., 20% of the time,10% of the time, etc.);• • An expectation that, even with accommodations, the student will not scorewell on the standard version of the <strong>CAPT</strong>.Formatted: Indent: Left: 0",Hanging: 0.25"Formatted: Bulleted + Level: 1 +Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 0.75"+ Indent at: 0.75"While there are no specific IQ requirements for participation in the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>Checklist</strong>,students who are assessed with the <strong>Checklist</strong> typically score two or more standard deviationsbelow the mean in terms of overall cognitive ability and have significant limitations both inintellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social and practicaladaptive skills. Frequently these students have been identified as having an IntellectualDisability (ID); however, students with other types of disabilities (e.g., Autism, MultipleDisabilities, Traumatic Brain Injury, etc.) who have evidence in their files of a significantcognitive disability may also satisfy the criteria for participation in the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><strong>Checklist</strong>.Beginning with the 2006-2007 test administration, teachers will be required to complete theLearner Characteristics Inventory (see Appendix M) developed by the National AlternateAssessment Center at the University of Kentucky.On advice of Connecticut’s <strong>Technical</strong> Advisory Committee this inventory of learnercharacteristics will be completed 3 or more months prior to administration of the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong><strong>Skills</strong> <strong>Checklist</strong> to minimize the possibility of a “halo” affect from completing the inventory, i.e.,rating the student on the <strong>Checklist</strong> to ensure agreement with the learner characteristics outlinedin the inventory.This collection of information about each student recommended for the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><strong>Checklist</strong> will permit the Connecticut State Department of Education to monitor the Planningand Placement Team identification procedures described earlier and will also permit theDepartment to match each student with demographic and achievement data contained in theDepartment’s Public School Information System (PSIS) data base.Formatted: Right: -0.5"x
Description of students and alternate assessment participation rateAs Table 1 indicates, approximately 0.7 percent of the students participating in the<strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> testing program have been assessed with the <strong>Checklist</strong> during each of the sixyears that the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> checklist has been Connecticut’s alternate assessmentoption. This figure is consistent with Federal guidance which limits the number ofstudents who may be counted as “proficient” on an alternate assessment to 1.0 percent ofthe total population of students who participate in a statewide assessment.Table 1<strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> SKILLS CHECKLISTParticipation Rates2000 – 20062000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006TotalStudents inGradesTested*169,585 173,996 175,732 176,571 176,054 306,821StudentsAssessedwith <strong>Skills</strong><strong>Checklist</strong>1,187 1,118 1,144 1,204 1,291 2,480Percent ofStudentsAssessedwith <strong>Skills</strong><strong>Checklist</strong>.71 .64 .65 .68 .73 .81*From the 2000-2001 school year to the 2005-2006 school year <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> testing occurred in grades 4, 6, 8 and 10.Beginning in the 2005-2006 school year <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> testing was expanded to include Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10.xi
- Page 1 and 2: DRAFT: October 19, 2006CONNECTICUT
- Page 3 and 4: CMT/CAPT SKILLS CHECKLISTTECHNICAL
- Page 5 and 6: SECTION I—OVERVIEW, BACKGROUND, A
- Page 7 and 8: In addition, the purpose of Connect
- Page 9 and 10: Thus, we - the public as well as ed
- Page 11 and 12: assessment should provide similar i
- Page 13: The Second Generation CMT/CAPT Skil
- Page 17 and 18: from a variety of contexts or to co
- Page 19 and 20: illustrates how to link all of the
- Page 21 and 22: Table 2TOTAL DOWNWARD EXTENSIONS BY
- Page 23 and 24: 3. What contributes to understandin
- Page 25 and 26: Orientation meetingIn early June 20
- Page 27 and 28: Guided item development processIn t
- Page 29 and 30: Who administers the Checklist?The C
- Page 31 and 32: • Implications for the inclusion
- Page 33 and 34: • a CD with the materials utilize
- Page 35 and 36: Video recordings selected to serve
- Page 37 and 38: Completing the CMT Skills Checklist
- Page 39 and 40: Completing the CMT Skills Checklist
- Page 41 and 42: The specific attestation in Section
- Page 43 and 44: Database audit trackingAll student
- Page 45 and 46: (A&EC), along with its sister compa
- Page 47 and 48: Appendix C) approved the standard s
- Page 49 and 50: identifies the student’s performa
- Page 51 and 52: match between the test items for su
- Page 53 and 54: Table 4Internal consistency (alpha)
- Page 55 and 56: Table 6Internal consistency (alpha)
- Page 57 and 58: APPENDIX ACMT/CAPT Skills Checklist
- Page 59 and 60: Patricia MoranCharlene Tate Nichols
- Page 61 and 62: CMT/CAPT Alternate Assessment Skill
- Page 63 and 64: Bill WalkerBeth WenzelJoanne WhiteC
- Page 65 and 66:
Technical Advisory CommitteePeter B
- Page 67 and 68:
Table 1ITEM BY STRAND (STANDARD): M
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 3TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: MATH
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 5TOTAL DOWNWARD EXTENSIONS: L
- Page 73 and 74:
APPENDIX EExamples of Downward Exte
- Page 75 and 76:
B. Students interpret, analyze and
- Page 77 and 78:
PARAMETERS OF ITEMS (I.E., DOWNWARD
- Page 79 and 80:
APPENDIX GStandard Terminology41
- Page 81 and 82:
APPENDIX HCMT/CAPT Skills Checklist
- Page 83 and 84:
APPENDIX JAlignment Analysis of Con
- Page 85 and 86:
TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction......
- Page 87 and 88:
• Pamela Brucker, Southern Connec
- Page 89 and 90:
Mathematics Framework were reformat
- Page 91 and 92:
corresponding to a standard had to
- Page 93 and 94:
• Use punctuation marks correctly
- Page 95 and 96:
Other Level 3 activities include dr
- Page 97 and 98:
Objective 2.1.a.Construct polygons
- Page 99 and 100:
The alignment analysis for grade fi
- Page 101 and 102:
The alignment analysis for grade te
- Page 103 and 104:
The alignment analysis for grade fo
- Page 105 and 106:
The alignment analysis for grade ei
- Page 107 and 108:
ReferencesValencia, S. W., & Wixson
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 1`Language Arts: Reading and
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 3Standards by Performance by
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 5Connecticut Alternate Assess
- Page 115 and 116:
APPENDIX MLearner Characteristics I
- Page 117 and 118:
APPENDIX ORelating Items from the C
- Page 119 and 120:
9/10-1 Activate prior knowledge, es
- Page 121 and 122:
APPENDIX PScope and Sequence Tables