CMT-CAPT Skills Checklist Technical Manual. - NAAC

ReferencesAmerican Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, &National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards foreducational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American EducationalResearch Association.Browder, D. Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., & Algozzine,R. (2005). How states implement alternative assessments for students withdisabilities: Recommendations for national policy. Journal of Disabilities PolicyStudies, 15, 209-220.Council of Chief State School Officers (2006). Handbook for developing alternateassessment technical adequacy (DAATA): producing documentation for states’alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities- finaldraft. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School OfficersCronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,16, 297-334Gong, B. & Marion, S. (2006). Dealing with flexibility in assessments for students withsignificant cognitive disabilities. Dover, NH: National Center for theImprovement of Educational Assessments, Inc. Available at:htttp://www.nciea.org/publications/AERA_BGSM06.pdfIndividuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Public Law 108-446.No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002)Quenemoen, R.F. & Thurlow, M.L. (2004, April). I say potato, you say potahto: AnAERA conference discussion paper. Paper presented at the 2004 annual meetingof the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Available at:http://education.umn.edu/nceo/Presentations/AERA2004QuenThur.pdfReeves, Douglas B. (2004). Making standards work. Englewood, CO. Center forPerformance Assessment.U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Standards and Assessments Peer ReviewGuidance: Information and Examples for Meeting Requirements of the No ChildLeft Behind Act of 2001.18