How do they learn?Students who are appropriately recommended to participate in the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><strong>Checklist</strong> typically:• Have significant cognitive disabilities in the areas memory, transfer oflearning, attention, etc.;• Require extensive prioritization within grade level content;• Do not show grade level achievement even with appropriate and intensiveinstruction over significant period of time;• Are multiple years behind grade level;• Require supports that reduce complexity or breadth of instructional content;• Require ongoing systematic instruction to learn new skills;• Require ongoing systematic instruction to generalize skills and then may onlytransfer to similar of familiar content or contexts;• Require key words, pictures, and auditory cues embedded in adapted orcontrolled text and may require a text reader to use these cues;• Require extensive supports, such as simplified symbol system, peer models,frequent cues or prompts, repetitions, etc., to retrieve responses;In a classroom setting these are students who may use symbolic language tocommunicate including written words, signs, Braille or language based augmentativesystems to request, initiate, and respond to questions, describe things or events andexpress preferences, however they typically experience difficulty initiating and sustainingsocial interactions and communicating with others in real life situations.Many of these students do not communicate at a symbolic language level but insteadcommunicate by using gestures or signing, pointing, assistive technology or through theuse of simple facial expressions or changes in muscle tone.While they may be able to follow simple directions presented through words (e.g.,spoken, signed, printed or any combination), they often also require additional cues suchas gestures, pictures, models, etc. for understanding.It is common for these students to experience impaired vision, hearing or motor skillsindividually or in combination. They are also students who often experience difficultyestablishing and maintaining social interactions and experience frequent absences fromschool due to health or medical issues.The majority of the students assessed with the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>Checklist</strong> are not ableto read fluently with basic (literal) understanding from paragraphs or short passages inprint or Braille or to apply computational procedures or to solve real-life word problemsxii
from a variety of contexts or to complete computational procedures even with the use of acalculator.IEP – for students to participate in AA-AASThe IEP Team (Planning and Placement Team – PPT in Connecticut) determines howstudents with disabilities should participate in the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> testing program. Thedecision about the most appropriate assessment (e.g., <strong>CMT</strong>, <strong>CAPT</strong> or <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong><strong>Checklist</strong>) is not to be based on current placement, disability category or the setting inwhich the student receives instruction. As was noted previously, Connecticut iscommitted to the principle that every student has the right to access the general educationcurriculum.The student’s current educational needs are the most criteria utilized when selecting anassessment method. Connecticut has a mandated IEP form that is utilized for all publicschool students determined to be eligible for special education services under IDEA.Page 9 of this standard IEP form includes a description of all statewide assessmentoptions which must be considered by the PPT when determining whether a studentshould participate in the standard <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> testing program or in the <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong><strong>Skills</strong> <strong>Checklist</strong> alternate assessment. This section of the IEP form also provides a placefor the team to document the basis for the recommendation.WHAT IS THE CONTENT?IntroductionThe <strong>CMT</strong>/<strong>CAPT</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> <strong>Checklist</strong> consists of fourthree sections. Section I: Grade LevelAcademic <strong>Skills</strong>-Language Arts (Reading and Communication) and Section II: GradeLevel Academic <strong>Skills</strong>-Mathematics assess Language Arts and Mathematics skillsincluded in the Connecticut Curriculum Framework at the student’s assigned grade level.Section III: Access <strong>Skills</strong>, assesses those communication, quantitative and pre-academicskills that students without disabilities typically develop prior to school entry. SectionIV: Rater Certification provides a place for the student’s primary special educationteacher to certify her/his ratings of the student’s performance. Section II: Grade LevelAcademic <strong>Skills</strong>-Language Arts and Section III: Grade Level Academic <strong>Skills</strong>-Mathematics assess Language Arts and Mathematics skills included in the ConnecticutCurriculum Framework at the student’s grade levelFormatted: Font: 12 pt, Not Italic,UnderlineThe Connecticut Curriculum Frameworks includes grade level Content Standards for anumber of curriculum areas, including those of Mathematics, Language Arts, andScience. These are the curriculum areas that are assessed by the Connecticut MasteryTest (<strong>CMT</strong>) and the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (<strong>CAPT</strong>), Connecticut’sstandard statewide assessments of academic performance.xiii
- Page 1 and 2: DRAFT: October 19, 2006CONNECTICUT
- Page 3 and 4: CMT/CAPT SKILLS CHECKLISTTECHNICAL
- Page 5 and 6: SECTION I—OVERVIEW, BACKGROUND, A
- Page 7 and 8: In addition, the purpose of Connect
- Page 9 and 10: Thus, we - the public as well as ed
- Page 11 and 12: assessment should provide similar i
- Page 13 and 14: The Second Generation CMT/CAPT Skil
- Page 15: Description of students and alterna
- Page 19 and 20: illustrates how to link all of the
- Page 21 and 22: Table 2TOTAL DOWNWARD EXTENSIONS BY
- Page 23 and 24: 3. What contributes to understandin
- Page 25 and 26: Orientation meetingIn early June 20
- Page 27 and 28: Guided item development processIn t
- Page 29 and 30: Who administers the Checklist?The C
- Page 31 and 32: • Implications for the inclusion
- Page 33 and 34: • a CD with the materials utilize
- Page 35 and 36: Video recordings selected to serve
- Page 37 and 38: Completing the CMT Skills Checklist
- Page 39 and 40: Completing the CMT Skills Checklist
- Page 41 and 42: The specific attestation in Section
- Page 43 and 44: Database audit trackingAll student
- Page 45 and 46: (A&EC), along with its sister compa
- Page 47 and 48: Appendix C) approved the standard s
- Page 49 and 50: identifies the student’s performa
- Page 51 and 52: match between the test items for su
- Page 53 and 54: Table 4Internal consistency (alpha)
- Page 55 and 56: Table 6Internal consistency (alpha)
- Page 57 and 58: APPENDIX ACMT/CAPT Skills Checklist
- Page 59 and 60: Patricia MoranCharlene Tate Nichols
- Page 61 and 62: CMT/CAPT Alternate Assessment Skill
- Page 63 and 64: Bill WalkerBeth WenzelJoanne WhiteC
- Page 65 and 66: Technical Advisory CommitteePeter B
- Page 67 and 68:
Table 1ITEM BY STRAND (STANDARD): M
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 3TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: MATH
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 5TOTAL DOWNWARD EXTENSIONS: L
- Page 73 and 74:
APPENDIX EExamples of Downward Exte
- Page 75 and 76:
B. Students interpret, analyze and
- Page 77 and 78:
PARAMETERS OF ITEMS (I.E., DOWNWARD
- Page 79 and 80:
APPENDIX GStandard Terminology41
- Page 81 and 82:
APPENDIX HCMT/CAPT Skills Checklist
- Page 83 and 84:
APPENDIX JAlignment Analysis of Con
- Page 85 and 86:
TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction......
- Page 87 and 88:
• Pamela Brucker, Southern Connec
- Page 89 and 90:
Mathematics Framework were reformat
- Page 91 and 92:
corresponding to a standard had to
- Page 93 and 94:
• Use punctuation marks correctly
- Page 95 and 96:
Other Level 3 activities include dr
- Page 97 and 98:
Objective 2.1.a.Construct polygons
- Page 99 and 100:
The alignment analysis for grade fi
- Page 101 and 102:
The alignment analysis for grade te
- Page 103 and 104:
The alignment analysis for grade fo
- Page 105 and 106:
The alignment analysis for grade ei
- Page 107 and 108:
ReferencesValencia, S. W., & Wixson
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 1`Language Arts: Reading and
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 3Standards by Performance by
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 5Connecticut Alternate Assess
- Page 115 and 116:
APPENDIX MLearner Characteristics I
- Page 117 and 118:
APPENDIX ORelating Items from the C
- Page 119 and 120:
9/10-1 Activate prior knowledge, es
- Page 121 and 122:
APPENDIX PScope and Sequence Tables